Have to say I’m surprised at your take. “Tanking Tesla stock is a pretty effective way to neuter him.” Fine, as far as that goes. Think you might have a different take if you were looking at your Minnesota employee retirement fund losing value as your state, as of the last known numbers, holds 1.6 million shares of Tesla stock? The term collateral damage applies here. Tesla is also a pretty large employer. Those employees can be at risk if some loon does something really stupid and futile.I don't agree with all of the vandalism, just don't buy them.
Now I will say this about Walz's position, if you believe Elon is a malignant influence on the government and that malignant influence is born out of his wealth, tanking Tesla stock is a pretty effective way to neuter him. From what I have read, his position in things like Twitter/X is directly related to leveraging the value of Tesla's stock.
I think that is a valid protest. Boycotts are sometimes counterproductive on the short term. If I were a Tesla stock holder I would want Elon bounced from his position. He is the one dragging the value down.
The arsonist is just adding more fuel to his fire . . . . And others suffer.
And somebody is going to die in one of these attacks. Won’t happen from some dipshit degenerate fat fvck lib reaching into his butt and then wiping his shit on someone’s Tesla. It will happen when someone firebombs a dealership and some people are caught in the aftermath.
So, Tim Walz gets no pass from me about “oh, we’ll just boycott his products and hurt him in his wallet; that’ll teach him.”
The problem is that others will inevitably suffer, financially and, more importantly, physically.
Tim Walz is supposedly a responsible public servant. Bullshit on that.
Don’t buy a Tesla. That’s cool. I know I won’t. No plans ever to buy one before this; no plans now to buy one. I never have and never will watch The View but I’m not going to firebomb their studio some night.
You’ve minimized and completely missed the point.