ADVERTISEMENT

MTG and others and the push to Impeach Biden.

cosmickid

Hall of Famer
Oct 23, 2009
13,616
8,537
113
Changed the thread title, to reflect the fact that MTG's wacky push is now not confined to her, but increasingly being adopted by some of her more zealous fellow GOP House members. I'm enjoying this...



So just today MTG has reintroduced her bill to impeach Biden. Apparently the GOP Trump apologists (like Marge) don't consider SWORN testimony in front of an acual Grand Jury (or to be more accurate 4 separate Grand Jurys) EVIDENCE of Trump's guilt in any of four seperate cases. But those same folks want to pretend that an UNVERIFIED account drawn up on an obscure FBI form in front of one of Rudy G's "investiagtors" is somehow the smoking gun to impeach Biden.

Anyone care to explain the difference, because MTG got it completely backwards as she embarrassed herself on the House floor.

Here is MTG, completely lying about what a DF-1023 is and is not. The person providing this "info" has to be a Ukrainian oligarch, because he claims to have had multiple phone conversations with Zlochevsky and oligarchs don't routinely converse and share secrets with peasants.

The timeline and various other factors point to Viktor Medvedchuk a pro-Russian relic of the Yanukovych regime (like Victor Shokin). An article from Time discussing Rudy's trips to Ukraine points out that Medvedchuk was the leader of a pro-Russian party that bent over backwards to assist Rudy's investigation team. They even offered to provide a back channel for the investigators to be able to get info from the Rusians to help them uncover Biden's alleged corruption.

Of course the Ukrainian Govt investigated the charges that Biden got Shokin fired for nefarious reasons, but they determined that Shokin was fired because he was CORRUPT. Btw, that is also the conclusion that Lev Parnas who was a key member of Rudy's team reached as well.

Of course if the Pubs try to impeach Biden, that will allow someone like Parnas to testify. By contrast Medvedchuk wouldn't be able to testify, because he's in Russia, with his buddy Putin. He was originally arrested as a traitor by Ukraine, but was repatriated to Russia when Putin insisted he be included among the 55 or so Russian soldiers that were returned home in exchange for 200 or so Ukrainian defenders of Mauriopol. So another stalwart GOP witness- only the best!

So here's Marge's speech, and all she needs are clown shoes and a bowtie that spins. She completely mischaracterizes what a DF-1023 and how aluable the FBI considered the CHS. Remember this DF dates back to the Trump days, so if the FBI and DOJ "ignored" it, those were Trump appointees. I mean why would they be suspicious of a DF that Rudy delivered, he's only being disbarred in two seperate jurisdictions?

So DANC went back and forth on what the DF claims, but right here in this video Marge claims that it says Zlochevsky paid Biden $10 Million to get Shokin fired. Because apparently Shokin was "investigating" his old buddy Zlochevsky.? Considering the last thing any of the oligarchs who were bribing Shokin wanted was to see him fired and replaced with someone who might actually go after them (and the $$Millions in funds they had stolen and were concealing from the Ukrainian Govt). Zlochevsky would have to be pretty stupid to want Shokin fired, since Shokin had done him a solid and actively prevented the Brits from being able to confiscate $$ Millions in funds Zlochevsky had tried to transfer to Cyprus...

Now if this is too many facts or your interest in reading posts is just to hear uninformed opinion, then I apologize for wasting your time. But if you want to know what really happened, that's why I'm posting background so you can see for yourself how ignorant most of what Marge said is. Marge claims that Zlochevsky wanted Shokin fired, but the reality is that Shokin was very instrumental in assisting Zlochevsky to get illegal funds out of the country. It's true Biden wanted Shokin fired, as did the entire US Admin. This is what the US Ambassador said in Sept 2015, 3 months before Biden urged Poroshenko to fire Shokin...

"We have learned that there have been times that the PGO (ie Shokin) not only did not support investigations into corruption, but rather undermined prosecutors working on legitimate corruption cases.

Now look at which case Pyatt specifically references as an example where the US was extremely upset with Shokin's actions

"For example, in the case of former Ecology Minister Mykola Zlochevsky, the U.K. authorities had seized 23 million dollars in illicit assets that belonged to the Ukrainian people. Officials at the PGO’s office were asked by the U.K to send documents supporting the seizure. Instead they sent letters to Zlochevsky’s attorneys attesting that there was no case against him. As a result the money was freed by the U.K. court and shortly thereafter the money was moved to Cyprus. The misconduct by the PGO officials who wrote those letters should be investigated, and those responsible for subverting the case by authorizing those letters should – at a minimum – be summarily terminated."


So according to Marge, Zlochevsky was so upset with Shokin and his prosecutors aiding and abetting him (Zlochevsky) to transfer $$ 23 Million to Cyprus (where Zlochevsky was in exile) that he,Zlochevsky wanted to pay Biden $$ 10 Million to get Shokin fired? See when you know facts and go beyond the political talking points, you're left with the ludicrous claim that not only did Zlochevsky want Biden to slit his throat (firing his inside guy), but he (Z) paid him (Biden) $$ 10 Million dollars to do it?

Watch the video,that's exactly what she says. Of course she doesn't know the actual facts about Zlochevsky's relationship with Shokin. Because she's never bothered to do a modicum of research. In fact IIRC she refers to Shokin as a "good" prosecutor...

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Bill4411
So just today MTG has reintroduced her bill to impeach Biden. Apparently the GOP Trump apologists (like Marge) don't consider SWORN testimony in front of an acual Grand Jury (or to be more accurate 4 separate Grand Jurys) EVIDENCE of Trump's guilt in any of four seperate cases. But those same folks want to pretend that an UNVERIFIED account drawn up on an obscure FBI form in front of one of Rudy G's "investiagtors" is somehow the smoking gun to impeach Biden. Anyone care to explain the difference, because MTG got it completely backwards as she embarrassed herself on the House floor.

Here is MTG, completely lying about what a DF-1023 is and is not. The person providing this "info" has to be a Ukrainian oligarch, because he claims to have had multiple phone conversations with Zlochevsky and oligarchs don't routinely converse and share secrets with peasants. The timeline and various other factors point to Viktor Medvedchuk a pro-Russian relic of the Yanukovych regime (like Victor Shokin). An article from Time discussing Rudy's trips to Ukraine points out that Medvedchuk was the leader of a pro-Russian party that bent over backwards to assist Rudy's investigation team. They even offered to provide a back channel for the investigators to be able to get info from the Rusians to help them uncover Biden's alleged corruption. Of course the Ukrainian Govt investigated the charges that Biden got Shokin fired for nefarious reasons, but they determined that Shokin was fired because he was CORRUPT. Btw, that is also the conclusion that Lev Parnas who was a key member of Rudy's team reached as well.

Of course if the Pubs try to impeach Biden, that will allow someone like Parnas to testify. By contrast Medvedchuk wouldn't be able to testify, because he's in Russia, with his buddy Putin. He was originally arrested as a traitor by Ukraine, but was repatriated to Russia when Putin insisted he be included among the 55 or so Russian soldiers that were returned home in exchange for 200 or so Ukrainian defenders of Mauriopol. So another stalwart GOP witness- only the best!

So here's Marge's speech, and all she needs are clown shoes and a bowtie that spins. She completely mischaracterizes what a DF-1023 and how aluable the FBI considered the CHS. Remember this DF dates back to the Trump days, so if the FBI and DOJ "ignored" it, those were Trump appointees. I mean why would they be suspicious of a DF that Rudy delivered, he's only being disbarred in two seperate jurisdictions...

So DANC went back and forth on what the DF claims, but right here in this video Marge claims that it says Zlochevsky paid Biden $10 Million to get Shokin fired. Because apparently Shokin was "investigating" his old buddy Zlochevsky.? Considering the last thing any of the oligarchs who were bribing Shokin wanted was to see him fired and replaced with someone who might actually go after them (and the $$Millions in funds they had stolen and were concealing from the Ukrainian Govt). Zlochevsky would have to be pretty stupid to want Shokin fired, since Shokin had done him a solid and actively prevented the Brits from being able to confiscate $$ Millions in funds Zlochevsky had tried to transfer to Cyprus...

Now if this is too many facts or your interest in reading posts is just to hear uninformed opinion, then I apologize for wasting your time. But if you want to know what really happened, that's why I'm posting background so you can see for yourself how ignorant most of what Maarge claims is. Marge claims that Zlochevsky wanted Shokin fired, but the reality is that Shokin was very instrumental in assisting Zlochevsky to get illegal funds out of the country. It's true Biden wanted Shokin fired, as did the entire US Admin. This is what the US Ambassador said in Sept 2015, 3 months before Biden urged Poroshenko to fire Shokin...

"We have learned that there have been times that the PGO (ie Shokin) not only did not support investigations into corruption, but rather undermined prosecutors working on legitimate corruption cases.

Now look at which case Pyatt specifically references as an example where the US was extremely upset with Shokin's actions

"For example, in the case of former Ecology Minister Mykola Zlochevsky, the U.K. authorities had seized 23 million dollars in illicit assets that belonged to the Ukrainian people. Officials at the PGO’s office were asked by the U.K to send documents supporting the seizure. Instead they sent letters to Zlochevsky’s attorneys attesting that there was no case against him. As a result the money was freed by the U.K. court and shortly thereafter the money was moved to Cyprus. The misconduct by the PGO officials who wrote those letters should be investigated, and those responsible for subverting the case by authorizing those letters should – at a minimum – be summarily terminated."


So according to Marge, Zlochevsky was so upset with Shokin and his prosecutors aiding and abetting him (Zlochevsky) to transfer $$ 23 Million to Cyprus (where Zlochevsky was in exile) that he,Zlochevsky wanted to pay Biden $$ 10 Million to get Shokin fired? See when you know facts and go beyond the political talking points, you're left with the ludicrous claim that not only did Zlochevsky want Biden to slit his throat (firing his inside guy), but he (Z) paid him (Biden) $$ 10 Million dollars to do it?

Watch the video,that's exactly what she says. Of course she doesn't know the actual facts about Zlochevsky's relationship with Shokin. Because she's never bothered to do a modicum of research. In fact IIRC she refers to Shokin as a "good" prosecutor...

THE BIDEN CRIME FAMILY
 
So just today MTG has reintroduced her bill to impeach Biden. Apparently the GOP Trump apologists (like Marge) don't consider SWORN testimony in front of an acual Grand Jury (or to be more accurate 4 separate Grand Jurys) EVIDENCE of Trump's guilt in any of four seperate cases. But those same folks want to pretend that an UNVERIFIED account drawn up on an obscure FBI form in front of one of Rudy G's "investiagtors" is somehow the smoking gun to impeach Biden.

Anyone care to explain the difference, because MTG got it completely backwards as she embarrassed herself on the House floor.

Here is MTG, completely lying about what a DF-1023 is and is not. The person providing this "info" has to be a Ukrainian oligarch, because he claims to have had multiple phone conversations with Zlochevsky and oligarchs don't routinely converse and share secrets with peasants.

The timeline and various other factors point to Viktor Medvedchuk a pro-Russian relic of the Yanukovych regime (like Victor Shokin). An article from Time discussing Rudy's trips to Ukraine points out that Medvedchuk was the leader of a pro-Russian party that bent over backwards to assist Rudy's investigation team. They even offered to provide a back channel for the investigators to be able to get info from the Rusians to help them uncover Biden's alleged corruption.

Of course the Ukrainian Govt investigated the charges that Biden got Shokin fired for nefarious reasons, but they determined that Shokin was fired because he was CORRUPT. Btw, that is also the conclusion that Lev Parnas who was a key member of Rudy's team reached as well.

Of course if the Pubs try to impeach Biden, that will allow someone like Parnas to testify. By contrast Medvedchuk wouldn't be able to testify, because he's in Russia, with his buddy Putin. He was originally arrested as a traitor by Ukraine, but was repatriated to Russia when Putin insisted he be included among the 55 or so Russian soldiers that were returned home in exchange for 200 or so Ukrainian defenders of Mauriopol. So another stalwart GOP witness- only the best!

So here's Marge's speech, and all she needs are clown shoes and a bowtie that spins. She completely mischaracterizes what a DF-1023 and how aluable the FBI considered the CHS. Remember this DF dates back to the Trump days, so if the FBI and DOJ "ignored" it, those were Trump appointees. I mean why would they be suspicious of a DF that Rudy delivered, he's only being disbarred in two seperate jurisdictions?

So DANC went back and forth on what the DF claims, but right here in this video Marge claims that it says Zlochevsky paid Biden $10 Million to get Shokin fired. Because apparently Shokin was "investigating" his old buddy Zlochevsky.? Considering the last thing any of the oligarchs who were bribing Shokin wanted was to see him fired and replaced with someone who might actually go after them (and the $$Millions in funds they had stolen and were concealing from the Ukrainian Govt). Zlochevsky would have to be pretty stupid to want Shokin fired, since Shokin had done him a solid and actively prevented the Brits from being able to confiscate $$ Millions in funds Zlochevsky had tried to transfer to Cyprus...

Now if this is too many facts or your interest in reading posts is just to hear uninformed opinion, then I apologize for wasting your time. But if you want to know what really happened, that's why I'm posting background so you can see for yourself how ignorant most of what Marge said is. Marge claims that Zlochevsky wanted Shokin fired, but the reality is that Shokin was very instrumental in assisting Zlochevsky to get illegal funds out of the country. It's true Biden wanted Shokin fired, as did the entire US Admin. This is what the US Ambassador said in Sept 2015, 3 months before Biden urged Poroshenko to fire Shokin...

"We have learned that there have been times that the PGO (ie Shokin) not only did not support investigations into corruption, but rather undermined prosecutors working on legitimate corruption cases.

Now look at which case Pyatt specifically references as an example where the US was extremely upset with Shokin's actions

"For example, in the case of former Ecology Minister Mykola Zlochevsky, the U.K. authorities had seized 23 million dollars in illicit assets that belonged to the Ukrainian people. Officials at the PGO’s office were asked by the U.K to send documents supporting the seizure. Instead they sent letters to Zlochevsky’s attorneys attesting that there was no case against him. As a result the money was freed by the U.K. court and shortly thereafter the money was moved to Cyprus. The misconduct by the PGO officials who wrote those letters should be investigated, and those responsible for subverting the case by authorizing those letters should – at a minimum – be summarily terminated."


So according to Marge, Zlochevsky was so upset with Shokin and his prosecutors aiding and abetting him (Zlochevsky) to transfer $$ 23 Million to Cyprus (where Zlochevsky was in exile) that he,Zlochevsky wanted to pay Biden $$ 10 Million to get Shokin fired? See when you know facts and go beyond the political talking points, you're left with the ludicrous claim that not only did Zlochevsky want Biden to slit his throat (firing his inside guy), but he (Z) paid him (Biden) $$ 10 Million dollars to do it?

Watch the video,that's exactly what she says. Of course she doesn't know the actual facts about Zlochevsky's relationship with Shokin. Because she's never bothered to do a modicum of research. In fact IIRC she refers to Shokin as a "good" prosecutor...

So for anyone (views on this thread are 47 people) interested in more details, Lev Parnas has released a video in which he reads the 10 page letter he sent to Comer/Oversight. He details in great detail the actions he took during 2018-19 when both Rudy and Trump first approached him and asked him to be part of their investigation to attempt to link the Bidens to corruption in Ukraine...

This is pretty juicy, including names like Vitoria Toensg, fellow Fox contributor Sean Hannity, John Solomon, and a host of others working with Trump and Rudy. As far as people in Ukraine he discusses there is Shokin, Lutsenko, Fitash and other oligarchs, and both Poroshenko and later Zelensky...

He details several actions by both Trump and Rudy that border on illegality, and it's easy to see why Comer does not want Parnas to testify. Lev was a hardcore Trumper, who basically changed his allegiance after he and Igor Fruman were arrested at Dulles in 2019, as they were waiting on a flight to Vienna where they were to meet up with Rudy and engage in more "investigations". But Lev has an uncanny ability to recall details, and much of what he recounts is info he has already provided previously to the GOP Senate committee who originally investigated claims of Biden corruption in 2020.

I haven't been able to find printed copies of the letter that I could copy and paste specific incidents and not have to summarize. One such incident that I found mindblowing is his recounting of a story told by a man named Vitaly Pruss, a Russian businessman who claimed to have ties to Burisma. At a lunch meeting in NYC in June 2019, Parnas,Rudy, the BLT Team (Rudy's assembled investigators) and others met Pruss and at that meeting he told them a pretty amazing story. Remember this is 2019...

Anyway, Pruss recounted that as a close friend of Devin Archer, he (Pruss) had earlier that year taken Hunter Biden to meet Kazakhstan's minister of Foreign Affairs. He told them that while on the trip Hunter had gotten blitzed on alcohol and drugs, and that while he was incapacitated, his LAPTOP had been compromised and copied by an FSB agent and members of Zlochevsky's team...

The trip to Kazakhstan was independently verified, and Parnas states that it was true that Hunter's hard drives were taken and duplicated. However Pruss told them that while the contents of the laptop were personally embarrassing (drug use and surrounded by girls) there was no evidence of financial crimes or other illegal activity in the data. Remember this is in June 2019, where both Rudy and Lev heard a story about Hunter's laptop being compromised in earlier 2019...

Now I don't recall exactly how long after that meeting that Rudy found himself in possession of the laptop. But just to know that an FSB agent had accessed it AND Rudy had been advised of that fact in June 2019, kind of illuminates the chain of custody questions surrounding the laptop. At the very least, in any sort of proceedings related to the laptop, Rudy will be forced to either confirm or deny what Lev is clearly prepared to swear to. And remember Pruss was aware of the contents of the laptop and told BOTH of them in June 2019 that there were pics of Hunter doing drugs and racy photos as well.

Anyway this video is pretty long (30 mins) but it's pretty fascinating to hear what Lev wrote to Comer and the details he provided, along with reiterating his desire to testify before Comer's committee. I doubt this is a road the Pubs want to travel down...

Politico published excerpts and made this analysis...

"In a new firsthand account, described in a detailed, ten-page, July 18, 2023, letter to Chairman Comer, Lev Parnas explained that the Form FD-1023 reiterated false allegations peddled as part of a “campaign orchestrated by Giuliani and Trump to dig up dirt on the Bidens, and to spread misinformation about them through various networks including government officials, journalists, and FOX News personnel.” In the letter, Mr. Parnas recounted his key role in Mr. Giuliani’s attempts to pressure Ukrainian individuals, including government officials, to provide false evidence that President Biden’s 2016 call for Mr. Shokin’s ouster was part of a corrupt deal. This campaign included offers to exchange political or legal support from the Trump Administration for false statements regarding President Biden"


 
Last edited:
So for anyone (views on this thread are 47 people) interested in more details, Lev Parnas has released a video in which he reads the 10 page letter he sent to Comer/Oversight. He details in great detail the actions he took during 2018-19 when both Rudy and Trump first approached him and asked him to be part of their investigation to attempt to link the Bidens to corruption in Ukraine...

This is pretty juicy, including names like Vitoria Toensg, fellow Fox contributor Sean Hannity, John Solomon, and a host of others working with Trump and Rudy. As far as people in Ukraine he discusses there is Shokin, Lutsenko, Fitash and other oligarchs, and both Poroshenko and later Zelensky...

He details several actions by both Trump and Rudy that border on illegality, and it's easy to see why Comer does not want Parnas to testify. Lev was a hardcore Trumper, who basically changed his allegiance after he and Igor Fruman were arrested at Dulles in 2019, as they were waiting on a flight to Vienna where they were to meet up with Rudy and engage in more "investigations". But Lev has an uncanny ability to recall details, and much of what he recounts is info he has already provided previously to the GOP Senate committee who originally investigated claims of Biden corruption in 2020.

I haven't been able to find printed copies of the letter that I could copy and paste specific incidents and not have to summarize. One such incident that I found mindblowing is his recounting of a story told by a man named Vitaly Pruss, a Russian businessman who claimed to have ties to Burisma. At a lunch meeting in NYC in June 2019, Parnas,Rudy, the BLT Team (Rudy's assembled investigators) and others met Prussand he told them a pretty amazing story. Remember this is 2019...

Anyway, Pruss recounted that as a close friend of Devin Archer, he (Pruss) had earlier that year taken Hunter Biden to meet Kazakhstan's minister of Foreign Affairs. He told them that while on the trip Hunter had gotten blitzed on alcohol and drugs, and that while he was incapacitated, his LAPTOP had been compromised and copied by an FSB agent and members of Zlochevsky's team...

The trip to Kazakhstan was independently verified, and Parnas states that it was true that Hunter's hard drives were taken and duplicated. However Pruss told them that while the contents of the laptop were personally embarrassing (drug use and surrounded by girls) there was no evidence of financial crimes or other illegal activity in the data. Remember this is in June 2019, where both Rudy and Lev heard a story about Hunter's laptop being compromised in earlier 2019...

Now I don't recall exactly how long after that meeting that Rudy found himself in possession of the laptop. But just to know that an FSB agent had accessed it AND Rudy had been advised of that fact in June 2019, kind of illuminates the chain of custody questions surrounding the laptop. At the very least, in any sort of proceedings related to the laptop, Rudy will be forced to either confirm or deny what Lev is clearly prepared to swear to. And remember Pruss was aware of the contents of the laptop and told BOTH of them in June 2019 that there were pics of Hunter doing drugs and racy photos as well.

Anyway this video is pretty long (30 mins) but it's pretty fascinating to hear what Lev wrote to Comer and the details he provided, along with reiterating his desire to testify before Comer's committee. I doubt this is a road the Pubs want to travel down...

Politico published excerpts and made this analysis...

"In a new firsthand account, described in a detailed, ten-page, July 18, 2023, letter to Chairman Comer, Lev Parnas explained that the Form FD-1023 reiterated false allegations peddled as part of a “campaign orchestrated by Giuliani and Trump to dig up dirt on the Bidens, and to spread misinformation about them through various networks including government officials, journalists, and FOX News personnel.” In the letter, Mr. Parnas recounted his key role in Mr. Giuliani’s attempts to pressure Ukrainian individuals, including government officials, to provide false evidence that President Biden’s 2016 call for Mr. Shokin’s ouster was part of a corrupt deal. This campaign included offers to exchange political or legal support from the Trump Administration for false statements regarding President Biden"


So I'm just keeping ahead of the Impeachment Saga.

Keep in mind, that everything in this thread (up until this point) has been told from the pro-GOP perspective. All of the events Lev documented in his letter ocurred while he was deeply invested into the PRO-TRUMP camp. As a Ukrainian American he had a ringside seat, and in many instances served as the translator/intermediary between Rudy and Trump and the folks that they desperately wanted to utilize to get a smoking gun on Biden...

Here's the latest BOMBSHELL- Maria Bartiromo and some knob Congressman from TN (Tim Burchett) discussing his predictions regarding Biden's impeachment. Since Burchett is a member of the Oversight Committee I'd advise him to at least give equal weight to the letter (that he apparently hasn't seen ) as he does to the DF-1023 from some anonymous "informer" who he continues to refer to as "credible"...

Maybe it's just me... But you'd think that before spouting off about things he obviously knows nothing about, he might want to at least read (and carefully consider) what the man who spent 2 YEARS INVESTIGATING the claims made in the DF 1023 (and elsewhere) and was (at that time) HEAVILY INVESTED in wanting the claims to be true, actually has to say. Especially as it relates to the lengths Rudy and Trump were willing to go to in their desperation to tie the Bidens to corruption in Ukraine. Just sayin...

My prediction is that some of these committee members are being hung out to dry by Comer, who obviously hasn't shared the contents of the letter that he received from Parnas with his more gullible colleagues. Strange how Comer (apparently) places more credence in an anonymous 1023 that the FBI was already suspicious of, rather than the sworn, previously submitted testimony of the person who was integrally involved in invesstigating the situation and already submitted his details to Congress previously...

Will we have the battle of the dueling witnesses? Guessing Maria and Rep Burchett don't know about the Parnas letter and/or his expressed willingness and desre to testify? Stay tuned...

 
Looks to me like cosmo is in Love with MTG. She is obviously providing great theatre for you and you're in heaven rambling about it like only you can do. Hmmmm
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ty Webb iu
Looks to me like cosmo is in Love with MTG. She is obviously providing great theatre for you and you're in heaven rambling about it like only you can do. Hmmmm
Actually I'm in love with how racing down the road is going to lead to the GOP losing the House, and returning idiots like MTG, Gym Jordan and others to minority status...

I especially love her insane idea to "expunge Trump" (she meant expunge Trump's impeachment) and I think that by all means Blowing in the wind McCrathy should bring that idea to the House floor for a vote. Nothing better than having multiple GOP Congressmen who were elected in Biden disticts (because they convinced consituents they were normal) having to go on public record voting to expunge Trump.

Roll on Marge!!
 
Actually I'm in love with how racing down the road is going to lead to the GOP losing the House, and returning idiots like MTG, Gym Jordan and others to minority status...

I especially love her insane idea to "expunge Trump" (she meant expunge Trump's impeachment) and I think that by all means Blowing in the wind McCrathy should bring that idea to the House floor for a vote. Nothing better than having multiple GOP Congressmen who were elected in Biden disticts (because they convinced consituents they were normal) having to go on public record voting to expunge Trump.

Roll on Marge!!
Interesting article on the behind the scenes tension in GOP over Impeachment...

 
Actually I'm in love with how racing down the road is going to lead to the GOP losing the House, and returning idiots like MTG, Gym Jordan and others to minority status...

I especially love her insane idea to "expunge Trump" (she meant expunge Trump's impeachment) and I think that by all means Blowing in the wind McCrathy should bring that idea to the House floor for a vote. Nothing better than having multiple GOP Congressmen who were elected in Biden disticts (because they convinced consituents they were normal) having to go on public record voting to expunge Trump.

Roll on Marge!!
Hahaha a new catch phrase. ROLL ON MARGE. LOLOL
 
Changed the thread title, to reflect the fact that MTG's wacky push is now not confined to her, but increasingly being adopted by some of her more zealous fellow GOP House members. I'm enjoying this...



So just today MTG has reintroduced her bill to impeach Biden. Apparently the GOP Trump apologists (like Marge) don't consider SWORN testimony in front of an acual Grand Jury (or to be more accurate 4 separate Grand Jurys) EVIDENCE of Trump's guilt in any of four seperate cases. But those same folks want to pretend that an UNVERIFIED account drawn up on an obscure FBI form in front of one of Rudy G's "investiagtors" is somehow the smoking gun to impeach Biden.

Anyone care to explain the difference, because MTG got it completely backwards as she embarrassed herself on the House floor.

Here is MTG, completely lying about what a DF-1023 is and is not. The person providing this "info" has to be a Ukrainian oligarch, because he claims to have had multiple phone conversations with Zlochevsky and oligarchs don't routinely converse and share secrets with peasants.

The timeline and various other factors point to Viktor Medvedchuk a pro-Russian relic of the Yanukovych regime (like Victor Shokin). An article from Time discussing Rudy's trips to Ukraine points out that Medvedchuk was the leader of a pro-Russian party that bent over backwards to assist Rudy's investigation team. They even offered to provide a back channel for the investigators to be able to get info from the Rusians to help them uncover Biden's alleged corruption.

Of course the Ukrainian Govt investigated the charges that Biden got Shokin fired for nefarious reasons, but they determined that Shokin was fired because he was CORRUPT. Btw, that is also the conclusion that Lev Parnas who was a key member of Rudy's team reached as well.

Of course if the Pubs try to impeach Biden, that will allow someone like Parnas to testify. By contrast Medvedchuk wouldn't be able to testify, because he's in Russia, with his buddy Putin. He was originally arrested as a traitor by Ukraine, but was repatriated to Russia when Putin insisted he be included among the 55 or so Russian soldiers that were returned home in exchange for 200 or so Ukrainian defenders of Mauriopol. So another stalwart GOP witness- only the best!

So here's Marge's speech, and all she needs are clown shoes and a bowtie that spins. She completely mischaracterizes what a DF-1023 and how aluable the FBI considered the CHS. Remember this DF dates back to the Trump days, so if the FBI and DOJ "ignored" it, those were Trump appointees. I mean why would they be suspicious of a DF that Rudy delivered, he's only being disbarred in two seperate jurisdictions?

So DANC went back and forth on what the DF claims, but right here in this video Marge claims that it says Zlochevsky paid Biden $10 Million to get Shokin fired. Because apparently Shokin was "investigating" his old buddy Zlochevsky.? Considering the last thing any of the oligarchs who were bribing Shokin wanted was to see him fired and replaced with someone who might actually go after them (and the $$Millions in funds they had stolen and were concealing from the Ukrainian Govt). Zlochevsky would have to be pretty stupid to want Shokin fired, since Shokin had done him a solid and actively prevented the Brits from being able to confiscate $$ Millions in funds Zlochevsky had tried to transfer to Cyprus...

Now if this is too many facts or your interest in reading posts is just to hear uninformed opinion, then I apologize for wasting your time. But if you want to know what really happened, that's why I'm posting background so you can see for yourself how ignorant most of what Marge said is. Marge claims that Zlochevsky wanted Shokin fired, but the reality is that Shokin was very instrumental in assisting Zlochevsky to get illegal funds out of the country. It's true Biden wanted Shokin fired, as did the entire US Admin. This is what the US Ambassador said in Sept 2015, 3 months before Biden urged Poroshenko to fire Shokin...

"We have learned that there have been times that the PGO (ie Shokin) not only did not support investigations into corruption, but rather undermined prosecutors working on legitimate corruption cases.

Now look at which case Pyatt specifically references as an example where the US was extremely upset with Shokin's actions

"For example, in the case of former Ecology Minister Mykola Zlochevsky, the U.K. authorities had seized 23 million dollars in illicit assets that belonged to the Ukrainian people. Officials at the PGO’s office were asked by the U.K to send documents supporting the seizure. Instead they sent letters to Zlochevsky’s attorneys attesting that there was no case against him. As a result the money was freed by the U.K. court and shortly thereafter the money was moved to Cyprus. The misconduct by the PGO officials who wrote those letters should be investigated, and those responsible for subverting the case by authorizing those letters should – at a minimum – be summarily terminated."


So according to Marge, Zlochevsky was so upset with Shokin and his prosecutors aiding and abetting him (Zlochevsky) to transfer $$ 23 Million to Cyprus (where Zlochevsky was in exile) that he,Zlochevsky wanted to pay Biden $$ 10 Million to get Shokin fired? See when you know facts and go beyond the political talking points, you're left with the ludicrous claim that not only did Zlochevsky want Biden to slit his throat (firing his inside guy), but he (Z) paid him (Biden) $$ 10 Million dollars to do it?

Watch the video,that's exactly what she says. Of course she doesn't know the actual facts about Zlochevsky's relationship with Shokin. Because she's never bothered to do a modicum of research. In fact IIRC she refers to Shokin as a "good" prosecutor...

You say thank you funny.
 
You say thank you funny.
I'm not even sure what that means. But Fox trying to divert on Trump news with this nonsense does 2 things I like...

First off it exposes some of this MAGA kookiness to voters who aren't particularly receptive to their ideas, which will result in backlash (like 2022) and two it provides me with a great deal of entertainment listening to morons make fools of themselves...

Speaking of which,Newt has decided to weigh in...

 
I'm not even sure what that means. But Fox trying to divert on Trump news with this nonsense does 2 things I like...

First off it exposes some of this MAGA kookiness to voters who aren't particularly receptive to their ideas, which will result in backlash (like 2022) and two it provides me with a great deal of entertainment listening to morons make fools of themselves...

Speaking of which,Newt has decided to weigh in...

The push to impeach Biden deserves a thank you from every American citizen. He's a disaster. Your words were a funny way of saying thank you. That's all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joe_Hoopsier
I especially love her insane idea to "expunge Trump" (she meant expunge Trump's impeachment)
Which would, of course, have no legal or practical effect.

What are her (and her caucus's) legislative initiatives these days? I'm assuming they're non-existent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cosmickid
The push to impeach Biden deserves a thank you from every American citizen. He's a disaster. Your words were a funny way of saying thank you. That's all.
It’s a waste of time because so far there is zero evidence .
 
The push to impeach Biden deserves a thank you from every American citizen. He's a disaster. Your words were a funny way of saying thank you.
Yeah I can't wait to hear Parnas repeat what he already said to Comer in his 10 page letter in front of a National TV audience...

"By reading the information below, you will understand the full extent of the campaign orchestrated by Giuliani and Trump to dig up dirt on the Bidens, and to SPREAD MISINFORMATION about them thru various networks including government officials, journalists and Fox News personnel. You will also see clearly that there is no evidence of Joe or Hunter Biden interfering with Ukrainian politics and there never has been. Statements suggesting otherwise have been DEBUNKED again and again. I hope the breadth of my experiences, which are all BACKED UP BY THE MATERIAL I HAVE PREVIOUSLY SHARED WITH CONGRESS, will prove that no stone has been unturned in this investigation"...

Just an FYI, when Parnas mentions sharing his info with Congress in 2020, he's referring to an investigating committee within the GOP-controlled Senate. And yes, they were aware of the DF -1023 and the allegtions it claimed...

This coming from a long time Republican with verifiable links to Rudy,Trump and DeSantis will be explosive testimony. Especially when he recounts how Comer ignored both his letter and his expressed desire to testify, and people ask Comer why that happened?

What's Comer gonna say? A man who has previously testified before Congress and has thoroughly debunked the whole DF 1023 that the GOP is relying on as some sort of "smoking gun" should not be heard by the general public as part of this ongoing "investigation"? That instead we should rely on the claims made by an anonymous CHS, who is likely a Russian agent and never going to testify. Over the word of an actual Ukrainian American who thoroughly investigated those claims (and others) on behalf of and in conjunction with Trump/Rudy?

Yeah, that will be entertaining. And just imagine, if in the midst of impeachment proceedings Gym Jordan is forced to testify in the OSU wrestlers' lawsuit vs OSU, which a judge recently ruled can go forward. Now that will be some high level entertainment...
 
Yeah I can't wait to hear Parnas repeat what he already said to Comer in his 10 page letter in front of a National TV audience...

"By reading the information below, you will understand the full extent of the campaign orchestrated by Giuliani and Trump to dig up dirt on the Bidens, and to SPREAD MISINFORMATION about them thru various networks including government officials, journalists and Fox News personnel. You will also see clearly that there is no evidence of Joe or Hunter Biden interfering with Ukrainian politics and there never has been. Statements suggesting otherwise have been DEBUNKED again and again. I hope the breadth of my experiences, which are all BACKED UP BY THE MATERIAL I HAVE PREVIOUSLY SHARED WITH CONGRESS, will prove that no stone has been unturned in this investigation"...

Just an FYI, when Parnas mentions sharing his info with Congress in 2020, he's referring to an investigating committee within the GOP-controlled Senate. And yes, they were aware of the DF -1023 and the allegtions it claimed...

This coming from a long time Republican with verifiable links to Rudy,Trump and DeSantis will be explosive testimony. Especially when he recounts how Comer ignored both his letter and his expressed desire to testify, and people ask Comer why that happened?

What's Comer gonna say? A man who has previously testified before Congress and has thoroughly debunked the whole DF 1023 that the GOP is relying on as some sort of "smoking gun" should not be heard by the general public as part of this ongoing "investigation"? That instead we should rely on the claims made by an anonymous CHS, who is likely a Russian agent and never going to testify. Over the word of an actual Ukrainian American who thoroughly investigated those claims (and others) on behalf of and in conjunction with Trump/Rudy?

Yeah, that will be entertaining. And just imagine, if in the midst of impeachment proceedings Gym Jordan is forced to testify in the OSU wrestlers' lawsuit vs OSU, which a judge recently ruled can go forward. Now that will be some high level entertainment...
So Nancy Mace made the Fox circuit today, and while she sounded cautionary and said they need to hear from EVERYONE, she still seemed blissfully unaware of the fact that Lev Parnas has not been allowed to testify And I'm not sure she actually answered the other burning question as well, which is what exactly are you going to impeach Joe Biden for?

I thought the Fox host did a pretty good job of trying to pin her down, and I didn't really catch how Mace answered some of her questions. Like the WSJ reporting that Archer is likely going to say that Joe wasn't involved in Hunter's business deals. So where do they go from here (assuming that's true)- the DF 1023?

Since Mace is apparently unaware of Lev Parnas's previous testimony to the Senate in 2020 and his expressed willingness to testify again to the Comer Circus, she may not realize that all of that has basically been debunked. Except of course in the eyes of certain ...GOP house members who somehow think they've discovered something new...

 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
So Nancy Mace made the Fox circuit today, and while she sounded cautionary and said they need to hear from EVERYONE, she still seemed blissfully unaware of the fact that Lev Parnas has not been allowed to testify And I'm not sure she actually answered the other burning question as well, which is what exactly are you going to impeach Joe Biden for?

I thought the Fox host did a pretty good job of trying to pin her down, and I didn't really catch how Mace answered some of her questions. Like the WSJ reporting that Archer is likely going to say that Joe wasn't involved in Hunter's business deals. So where do they go from here (assuming that's true)- the DF 1023?

Since Mace is apparently unaware of Lev Parnas's previous testimony to the Senate in 2020 and his expressed willingness to testify again to the Comer Circus, she may not realize that all of that has basically been debunked. Except of course in the eyes of certain ...GOP house members who somehow think they've discovered something new...

So the Foxbots are desperate to drive the Impeachment machine and change the subject from Trump. Started with "interpid investigative reporter" Brian Kilmeade "interviewing" the one and only Viktor Shokin. Actually it's more correct to say that ol' Bri listened to Shokin lie and is so ignorant of the topic that he couldn't even delve into a single lie...Either this is a master liar at work, or the interpretor is playing a twisted game, with regards to what Shokin actually says here...

I went thru this and counted numerous blatant lies. Apparently Brian found zero...



Viktor lies from the jump. Brian asks why he was fired, and he says pressure from Biden,and there were no complaints with how he was doing his job...

No complaints?...

Let's look at the timeline of eventss leaading up to Shokin being fired (by Parliament) on March 29, 2016...

Sept 4, 2015-US ambassador Pyatt speaking at the Odessa Eco forum lashes out at corruption within the PGO (Prosecutor General's ofc). He is particularly incensed by one particular incident...

"We have learned that there have been times that the PGO not only did not support investigations into corruption, but rather undermined prosecutors working on legitimate corruption cases. For example, in the case of former Ecology Minister Mykola Zlochevsky, the U.K. authorities had seized 23 million dollars in illicit assets that belonged to the Ukrainian people.


Officials at the PGO’s office were asked by the U.K to send documents supporting the seizure. Instead they sent letters to Zlochevsky’s attorneys attesting that there was no case against him. As a result the money was freed by the U.K. court and shortly thereafter the money was moved to Cyprus.The misconduct by the PGO officials who wrote those letters should be investigated, and those responsible for subverting the case by authorizing those letters should – at a minimum – be summarily terminated.

(Since Shokin is the Prosecutor General he either approved the letters (corrupt) or is unaware of what his subordinates did aka incompetent.) Either way, the US clearly indicates that the US blames him. And for anyone who doesn't know, Zlochevsky is the head of BURISMA, who was living in exile in Cyprus...



Then on Oct 31, the Kyiv Post reported on Ukrainians driving to Poroshenko's house to deman the firing of Shokin.

Less than a week later, the Atlantic Council posted an article on why Poroshenko's continued support for Shokin was DANGEROUS. Nov 4, 2015...

So three distinct callings for Shokin's dismissal for corruption two months BEFORE Biden in Dec 2015 threatened to withold loan guarantees if Poroshenk didn't fire Shokin (the infamous video)... Btw as I mentioned earlier, Shokin wasn't fired till March 29 2016, more than 3 months later... Events in 2016 that put more pressure on Poroshenko to fire Shokin...

Feb 12, 2016 The bipartisan US Senate Committee on Ukraine (headed by GOP-OH Rob Portman) sends a letter to Ukraine basically calling for reform within the PGO...

Feb 16, 2016 Vitali Kasko a pro-US minister within the PGO, resigns and goes on National tv to call out Shokin's corruption as a "hindrance to reform"...

On March 28, 2016 protestors again demand Shokin to be fired. From RFE...

And a day later Parliament dismisses him...
Now if ol'Bri really was a truth seeker he could easily google exactly what I did. And notice how all of these references are from 2015-2016, not some revisionist account of events being written 8 or 9 yrs later...

Not sure why Biden would need to be bribed for joining in on worldwide calls for Shokin's dismissal coming from everyone. Maybe they were all trying to protect Hunter? DWS

But here's the really crazy part... The claim is Burisma "bribed" Biden to get Shokin fired. But ALL of these folks who demanded Shokin be fired, were angry at Shokin for NOT investigating Burisma, Zlochevsky and all of the other oligarchs who were basically protected from Prosecution due to Shokin's corruption.

So why did Burisma want Shokin fired? And pay $10 Million to have Biden do it?
I'm actually eager to see Fox try and explain this. Check out how the Five are reduced to changing the subject when Jessica Tarlov points out the inconvenient holes and false claims in their narrative...

Drunk Jeanine is hilarious here, as she can't present actual evidence to refute, and pivots to talking about that mainstay talking point of the stupid, the "Soros prosecutors"


Btw all of the Foxbots claiming that "no one ever interviewed Shokin", are seemingly unaware of the fact that Lev Parnas (when he was in charge of Trump/Rudy's investigations digging for corruption involving Biden), interviewed Shokin in Ukraine in 2019.
 
Last edited:
Kamala will be in charge? SMH OMG
Why are so many Christians so completely enamored with arguably the most Un-Christlike politician in American history? I mean, loving him to the level of a religious icon and cult figure. Comparing him to Jesus, even.

Explain it to me as if I were a 5th grader. I'd honestly like to know.
 
So the Foxbots are desperate to drive the Impeachment machine and change the subject from Trump. Started with "interpid investigative reporter" Brian Kilmeade "interviewing" the one and only Viktor Shokin. Actually it's more correct to say that ol' Bri listened to Shokin lie and is so ignorant of the topic that he couldn't even delve into a single lie...Either this is a master liar at work, or the interpretor is playing a twisted game, with regards to what Shokin actually says here...

I went thru this and counted numerous blatant lies. Apparently Brian found zero...



Viktor lies from the jump. Brian asks why he was fired, and he says pressure from Biden,and there were no complaints with how he was doing his job...

No complaints?...

Let's look at the timeline of eventss leaading up to Shokin being fired (by Parliament) on March 29, 2016...

Sept 4, 2015-US ambassador Pyatt speaking at the Odessa Eco forum lashes out at corruption within the PGO (Prosecutor General's ofc). He is particularly incensed by one particular incident...

"We have learned that there have been times that the PGO not only did not support investigations into corruption, but rather undermined prosecutors working on legitimate corruption cases. For example, in the case of former Ecology Minister Mykola Zlochevsky, the U.K. authorities had seized 23 million dollars in illicit assets that belonged to the Ukrainian people.


Officials at the PGO’s office were asked by the U.K to send documents supporting the seizure. Instead they sent letters to Zlochevsky’s attorneys attesting that there was no case against him. As a result the money was freed by the U.K. court and shortly thereafter the money was moved to Cyprus.The misconduct by the PGO officials who wrote those letters should be investigated, and those responsible for subverting the case by authorizing those letters should – at a minimum – be summarily terminated.

(Since Shokin is the Prosecutor General he either approved the letters (corrupt) or is unaware of what his subordinates did aka incompetent.) Either way, the US clearly indicates that the US blames him. And for anyone who doesn't know, Zlochevsky is the head of BURISMA, who was living in exile in Cyprus...



Then on Oct 31, the Kyiv Post reported on Ukrainians driving to Poroshenko's house to deman the firing of Shokin.

Less than a week later, the Atlantic Council posted an article on why Poroshenko's continued support for Shokin was DANGEROUS. Nov 4, 2015...

So three distinct callings for Shokin's dismissal for corruption two months BEFORE Biden in Dec 2015 threatened to withold loan guarantees if Poroshenk didn't fire Shokin (the infamous video)... Btw as I mentioned earlier, Shokin wasn't fired till March 29 2016, more than 3 months later... Events in 2016 that put more pressure on Poroshenko to fire Shokin...

Feb 12, 2016 The bipartisan US Senate Committee on Ukraine (headed by GOP-OH Rob Portman) sends a letter to Ukraine basically calling for reform within the PGO...

Feb 16, 2016 Vitali Kasko a pro-US minister within the PGO, resigns and goes on National tv to call out Shokin's corruption as a "hindrance to reform"...

On March 28, 2016 protestors again demand Shokin to be fired. From RFE...

And a day later Parliament dismisses him...
Now if ol'Bri really was a truth seeker he could easily google exactly what I did. And notice how all of these references are from 2015-2016, not some revisionist account of events being written 8 or 9 yrs later...

Not sure why Biden would need to be bribed for joining in on worldwide calls for Shokin's dismissal coming from everyone. Maybe they were all trying to protect Hunter? DWS

But here's the really crazy part... The claim is Burisma "bribed" Biden to get Shokin fired. But ALL of these folks who demanded Shokin be fired, were angry at Shokin for NOT investigating Burisma, Zlochevsky and all of the other oligarchs who were basically protected from Prosecution due to Shokin's corruption.

So why did Burisma want Shokin fired? And pay $10 Million to have Biden do it?
I'm actually eager to see Fox try and explain this. Check out how the Five are reduced to changing the subject when Jessica Tarlov points out the inconvenient holes and false claims in their narrative...

Drunk Jeanine is hilarious here, as she can't present actual evidence to refute, and pivots to talking about that mainstay talking point of the stupid, the "Soros prosecutors"


Btw all of the Foxbots claiming that "no one ever interviewed Shokin", are seemingly unaware of the fact that Lev Parnas (when he was in charge of Trump/Rudy's investigations digging for corruption involving Biden), interviewed Shokin in Ukraine in 2019.

 
Just like Pence was in charge? No, House impeachment still has to go to the Senate.
Thank you I worded that wrong, BUT if he is convicted does it automatically go the vice president? I know Ford took over for Nixon when he "resigned", but what happens in case he does get convicted?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Bowlmania
Thank you I worded that wrong, BUT if he is convicted does it automatically go the vice president? I know Ford took over for Nixon when he "resigned", but what happens in case he does get convicted?
Seriously? Yes the VP takes over. But never fear. Thanks to Trump the Dems have the Senate and they aren’t voting to convict.
 
Seriously? Yes the VP takes over. But never fear. Thanks to Trump the Dems have the Senate and they aren’t voting to convict.
Yes, Trump is the reason the Dems have a majority in the Senate but geniuses like the "common sense" poster can't grasp that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ohio Guy
AND therein lies the problem. A fixed bunch of crap. If a side presents their case, political parties should step aside and do whats right based on the evidence. DC needs to go! All of them.
Exactly. Like both of Trump’s impeachments. My favorite part was when Republicans wouldn’t let there be anyone called to testify and then afterwards said they didn’t vote to convict because they didn’t get to hear the testimony, That was good. As of now, the Republicans have nothing to impeach Joe Biden for. Now if it was Hunter, they might have a case….
 
I'm not sure if you're aware of it or not, but those were contributions he arranged for DeSantis? He also testified to the GOP controlled Senate Committee in 2020, which is why you don't see a bunch of GOP Senators joining in with all of Comey/Jordan's nonsense...

Again when he was in Ukraine in 2019 it was specifically on instructions from Rudy/Trump who sent him there to find dirt on Biden. In fact when he was arrested at Dulles in Oct 2019, he had a 1 way ticket to Vienna to meet up with Rudy and conduct another investigation.


He's currently under house arrest after being released from prison, which is why all of his interviews are conducted by remote media. But again, when he conducted all of the investigations in Ukraine in 2019 he was on Rudy's team and he was hoping to find dirt on Biden.

He wasn't happy to discover there was no corruption, but he conducted very thorough interviews (he's Ukrainian American) and found out that Trump/Rudy were barking up the wrong tree. And what's worse, when he reported that to them they ignored what he told them. That's when he realized they weren't after the truth, but just wanted to destroy Biden...

I believe he discussed his prior interview with Shokin in this 10 page letter he wrote to Comey saying that the GOP was involveed in an embarrassing nonsensical witchunt. Not only that but he offered to testify under oath before the Comey committee, which is of course the last thing Comey wants...

Now I'm not afraid to watch the Fox videos with and praising Shokin, or call out the lies he told. Are you brave enough to watch Parnas read the exact letter he already sent to Comey? Because if you do you'll understand exactly why the GOP would not let Archer testify on tv, and why they will do their damndest to keep Parnas from testifying under oath on national tv.

Which is why I doubt the GOP will ever actually launch an "Impeachment Inquiry", because that would result in them no longer being able to control the narrative. At this stage, only the GOP is allowed to call witnesses, but if they launch an official "Impeachment probe" then the Dems can call witnesses and a bulldog like (former US attny) Goldman will be able to cross-examine. Neither Comey nor Jordan are even lawyers, and going up against Goldman and Raskin will mean getting their asses handed to them. Hell Lev even resurrects Devin Nunes and the roll he played in the conspiracy...

 
  • Like
Reactions: Ohio Guy
AND therein lies the problem. A fixed bunch of crap. If a side presents their case, political parties should step aside and do whats right based on the evidence. DC needs to go! All of them.
Unless the Pubs have something real, not the BS they are trying to sell on Ukraine/Shokin, there is no way in hell they even get enough GOP votes to provide an Impeachment. Many of those moderate GOP members came from districts Biden won by 8-10 points or more, and no way they are going to sacrifice their careers by voting to impeach Biden without a lot more evidence than what the Pubs have provided to date...

I told you guys before- none of this is new. The GOP Senate conducted their own investigation in 2020, prior to the elction in order to try and help Trump. From the Sept 23,2020 NYT...

" An election-year investigation by Senate Republicans into corruption allegations against Joseph R. Biden Jr. and his son, Hunter, involving Ukraine found no evidence of improper influence or wrongdoing by the former vice president, closing out an inquiry its leaders had hoped would tarnish the Democratic presidential nominee."

The summary...

"But an 87-page report summing up the findings, released jointly on Wednesday by the Senate Homeland Security and Finance Committees, contained no evidence that the elder Mr. Biden improperly manipulated American policy toward Ukraine or committed any other misdeed. In fact, investigators heard witness testimony that rebutted those charges." (like Lev Parnas)

 
  • Like
Reactions: Ohio Guy
If you believe shiff ive got some oceanfront in kansas for sale.

Bottom line the pubs are dragging their heels for the reasons above. All of DC needs to go. We don't need them but they need us.
Uh it wasn’t Schiff we needed to believe. It was mostly Republicans.
 
Uh it wasn’t Schiff we needed to believe. It was mostly Republicans.
Yea right...all is well in DC. Wonder what was in the envelopes? Always wondered. The Bushes are evil evil people and that group that day...Bushes, Clintons, Obama's, Biden all got notes. Trump, they were nervous around him. Like scared nervous it was weird. Carry On. The Bushes looked like ghosts after the envelope was passed around and so did the rest.

 
Why are so many Christians so completely enamored with arguably the most Un-Christlike politician in American history? I mean, loving him to the level of a religious icon and cult figure. Comparing him to Jesus, even.

Explain it to me as if I were a 5th grader. I'd honestly like to know.
CINO
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ohio Guy
Yea right...all is well in DC. Wonder what was in the envelopes? Always wondered. The Bushes are evil evil people and that group that day...Bushes, Clintons, Obama's, Biden all got notes. Trump, they were nervous around him. Like scared nervous it was weird. Carry On. The Bushes looked like ghosts after the envelope was passed around and so did the rest.

Wut.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT