If your point is that most women are generally less aggressive than most men, I agree. It’s. genetic. There are physical differences in male and female brains. I’m arrogant enough to believe that others could not have lived my life and made as much of it as I did. But that’s not to say that if I was a woman with the same intellectual ability, that I wouldn’t have been as successful in a different way. And by success, I don’t mean money, I’m talking about the degree of satisfaction.I should have clarified the sports comment.
Point being, most good paying jobs and positions of leadership doesn't require a physicality advantage.
Being a woman comes with perceived disadvantages, roles that yesterday's society squeezed people into.
I don't doubt you are a brilliant lawyer that has had great success. I also don't doubt that if you had tits and a vagina you wouldn't of had the same career path even though your intellectual skills would be exactly the same.
If you did, then you did it while being accused of blowing your way to the success you had. You'd also would have been paid less.
Which is the rub.
Women can't compete with men when it comes to certain physically. So yeah, there probably won't be any female NFL players or too many ditch diggers.
Most high demand positions these days are driven by intellect and drive. Doesn't matter if you have a dick or a vag, but yet there is a social difference. We've talked about it before how women get put in positions of nurturing and men get put in positions of power.
I believe these kids are saying that's dumb and antiquated thinking. Eliminate it altogether or let me pick the pronoun.