are affirmed in the inevitable court challenges.
What stops a chief executive from stacking a government agency, say Homeland Security with operators whose primary mission was to destroy anyone daring to oppose that executive?
Short of 'violence', any act of lawfare, intimidation, false arrest, anything you might think of, for years, could just go away with the stroke of the pen.
Is this what we want?
Think carefully.
What stops a chief executive from stacking a government agency, say Homeland Security with operators whose primary mission was to destroy anyone daring to oppose that executive?
Short of 'violence', any act of lawfare, intimidation, false arrest, anything you might think of, for years, could just go away with the stroke of the pen.
Is this what we want?
Think carefully.