Yesterday, the living survivor testified that Rittenhouse only shot him after he pointed his weapon at Rittenhouse.
Today the prosecutor apparently commented on Rittenhouse’s execution of his right to remain silent after arrest IN FRONT OF THE JURY. It was such a plain violation the judge yelled at the prosecutor.
The defense has moved for a mistrial (Not sure they should after yesterday), but my question s - do you think the prosecutor did it on purpose? To force a mistrial after yesterday’s case-damning testimony?
PS - if you’ve never been yelled at by a judge, explain yourself!
Today the prosecutor apparently commented on Rittenhouse’s execution of his right to remain silent after arrest IN FRONT OF THE JURY. It was such a plain violation the judge yelled at the prosecutor.
The defense has moved for a mistrial (Not sure they should after yesterday), but my question s - do you think the prosecutor did it on purpose? To force a mistrial after yesterday’s case-damning testimony?
PS - if you’ve never been yelled at by a judge, explain yourself!