Whether libs or pubs I have the same distain for lazy asses sitting home collecting unemployment and welfare when there’s plenty of jobs.so only dems collect unemployment? check the actual stats
Whiny ass libs are ones pushing the free stuff.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Whether libs or pubs I have the same distain for lazy asses sitting home collecting unemployment and welfare when there’s plenty of jobs.so only dems collect unemployment? check the actual stats
Bwahahahahaha. The English.... You wouldn’t make it a week in an Amish community.I guarantee I have worked just as hard and just as long (if not harder and longer) as you, Stoll, so climb off that cross you seem fit to hang around on, and lighten the fvck up.
(BTW, my wife has worked just as hard and long as you, as well...and somehow we have managed to stay happily married for over 33 years and still going, to boot...so stick that in your corncob pipe and smoke it.)
I think mosf of the anger at that point should be directed at those who are borrowing trillions of dollars in the credit of our children and grandchildren so that people can sit at home when there is clearly work available literally everywhere. That being said, yeah, we should be angry at people who are capable of working but won't.
Bunch of entitled assholes, "well that job does not pay enough", well, in a just world it would pay more than the zero that your lazy ass should be receiving to sit at home. There is a time and place for welfare, this ain't it.
Twenty's original post says that BW3 is offering above what all the lefties have been saying is a "fair" minimum wage by a few dollars an hour. And people are turning it down...not because the wage is not good at that point, but because the extra $80 a week is not worth it to get off their lazy ass. Why go to all that trouble to go earn your money when a little scrimping here and there can let you be at home all day?
It would be one thing if we were in the middle of a depression and work was hard to come by, but you cannot go out these days without tripping on a help wanted sign. And last I checked we had 11 million people collecting unemployment. That is not hard times, it is lazy, mooching, dickheads.
Best line of the week!Not to start a fight here
Bwahahahahaha. The English.... You wouldn’t make it a week in an Amish community.
I'll put my work ethic up against any Amish poster on here!Bwahahahahaha. The English.... You wouldn’t make it a week in an Amish community.
Your last paragraph is where I would step in and force the issue as the government by ending all expanded unemployment benefits so that the pay went back to what it was before COVID and instead of people losing out on $40 to $80 a week by being picky, they would be losing out on several hundred dollars. It should not be more lucrative to stay home when the economy is begging for labor and we have 11 million laborers sitting on the sidelines because of government benefits. That is the whole point.I agree that there are lazy people that take full advantage of the system, but there are also people that have worked their entire lives that should be able to take advantage of unemployment when needed.
I've got a theory that the pandemic started a trend of boomers retiring early. I know at my work, we had two retire early, and we only have about 40 employees. They were guys that had been kicking around the idea but the pandemic just pushed them over the edge. I could be totally wrong, but I'm guessing that's where a portion of our workforce went.
My father always said, "know your worth." I've worked a long time and if I lost my job know, I wouldn't rush into the first thing just because it was a paying job unless I really wanted it and it fit what I wanted to do. He's also always taught me basic math. If staying at home makes me more than job A does, and job A isn't a place that I want to work and would stay at, why would I take take that job?
Only the English would have the hubris to make such an outlandish remarkI'll put my work ethic up against any Amish poster on here!
Your last paragraph is where I would step in and force the issue as the government by ending all expanded unemployment benefits so that the pay went back to what it was before COVID and instead of people losing out on $40 to $80 a week by being picky, they would be losing out on several hundred dollars. It should not be more lucrative to stay home when the economy is begging for labor and we have 11 million laborers sitting on the sidelines because of government benefits. That is the whole point.
And yes, if a better paying job is available to you or a similar paying job and you continue to collect money from the taxpayers, I do judge you harshly.
Your last paragraph is where I would step in and force the issue as the government by ending all expanded unemployment benefits so that the pay went back to what it was before COVID and instead of people losing out on $40 to $80 a week by being picky, they would be losing out on several hundred dollars. It should not be more lucrative to stay home when the economy is begging for labor and we have 11 million laborers sitting on the sidelines because of government benefits. That is the whole point.
And yes, if a better paying job is available to you or a similar paying job and you continue to collect money from the taxpayers, I do judge you harshly.
Actually, it was a pretty safe remark.Only the English would have the hubris to make such an outlandish remark
Thankfully. It was a perverse, economy killing incentive. We don't have things if people don't work.Well it seems many states are pulling the plug on the UEI boost. Even the People's Republic of California is reinstating the requirement to actively look for work next month. Indiana ended the boost June 19th
Thankfully. It was a perverse, economy killing incentive. We don't have things if people don't work.
Nutty times, indeed. Did everyone just decide they are done working?
Well it seems many states are pulling the plug on the UEI boost. Even the People's Republic of California is reinstating the requirement to actively look for work next month. Indiana ended the boost June 19th.
Ends nationally in Sept so I anticipate this only being a transitory issue.
I think as cited in mark’s article some people saved money by a year of not going out etc. no rush to go backI'm not convinced that it is the UIE alone, however. Particularly for these service level jobs in travel and leisure. Certainly a part of it, but that alone isn't enough to fill the some 9m job openings.
It may not be the only thing, but it is at least a start. Even if it only fills 60% of the jobs, it is better than what is currently happening.I'm not convinced that it is the UIE alone, however. Particularly for these service level jobs in travel and leisure. Certainly a part of it, but that alone isn't enough to fill the some 9m job openings.
I won’t argue with your math. If my golf buddy followed your math he wouldn’t be a multi millionaire with multiple franchise locations and retired playing golf every day ending in Y before age 60.I agree that there are lazy people that take full advantage of the system, but there are also people that have worked their entire lives that should be able to take advantage of unemployment when needed.
I've got a theory that the pandemic started a trend of boomers retiring early. I know at my work, we had two retire early, and we only have about 40 employees. They were guys that had been kicking around the idea but the pandemic just pushed them over the edge. I could be totally wrong, but I'm guessing that's where a portion of our workforce went.
My father always said, "know your worth." I've worked a long time and if I lost my job know, I wouldn't rush into the first thing just because it was a paying job unless I really wanted it and it fit what I wanted to do. He's also always taught me basic math. If staying at home makes me more than job A does, and job A isn't a place that I want to work and would stay at, why would I take take that job?
How many hours you work a week?I'll put my work ethic up against any Amish poster on here!
I won’t argue with your math. If my golf buddy followed your math he wouldn’t be a multi millionaire with multiple franchise locations and retired playing golf every day ending in Y before age 60.
There’s some chicken and egg stuff too. Today, many downtown Indianapolis restaurants are still closed. When they closed in March 2020, many lost their jobs and relied on the UI benefits. Fast forward to today, many jobs never came back. So are the restaurants closed because they can’t get workers or are many unemployed because the restaurants are closed?It may not be the only thing, but it is at least a start. Even if it only fills 60% of the jobs, it is better than what is currently happening.
Maybe the baby boomers finally up and left the labor force...who knows, but we will get a clearer picture of the issue when we get rid of the artificial bump to unemployment caused by these additional payments.
I have numerous examples in my practice and other friends. I also have myself as an example.Thats great for him. How many others has that worked out for?
I’ve done all those but churn butter 😂I can churn butter, hand-milk a cow, pluck a chicken, help build a barn, and clean a squirrel.
Mad Amish skills
I have numerous examples in my practice and other friends. I also have myself as an example.
Operating a butter churn is like using a hand crank ice cream maker, but even SLOWER.I’ve done all those but churn butter 😂
Maybe they’re waiting it out. My buddy owns a half a dozen restaurants and he related between the “price of protein” and shortage of staff he was better off during the shutdown. Hyperbole a bit but who knows. I bet people saved money not going out, got stimulus, unemployment and aren’t desperate yet. I bet this fall we see a return to normalcyThere’s some chicken and egg stuff too. Today, many downtown Indianapolis restaurants are still closed. When they closed in March 2020, many lost their jobs and relied on the UI benefits. Fast forward to today, many jobs never came back. So are the restaurants closed because they can’t get workers or are many unemployed because the restaurants are closed?
DingdingdingdingdingdingdingdingI suspect that has something to do with it. Or the hiring people are reluctant to hire someone older and more experienced than they are.
Or perhaps they're closed because of overzealous policies and that's also why there are unemployed people.So are the restaurants closed because they can’t get workers or are many unemployed because the restaurants are closed?
Networking is always good, but particularly at this point in your careeer.As someone just shy of 50 who will be in the job hunt soon, this terrifies me. I think it’s a real thing and it is part of the reason I’m being proactive and moving before I hit the big 50.
I am not downtown as much anymore but I can tell you my area (Noblesville/Fishers) is hiring everywhere. The restaurants are open and they almost all want employees. That goes from fast food to the higher end establishments.There’s some chicken and egg stuff too. Today, many downtown Indianapolis restaurants are still closed. When they closed in March 2020, many lost their jobs and relied on the UI benefits. Fast forward to today, many jobs never came back. So are the restaurants closed because they can’t get workers or are many unemployed because the restaurants are closed?
Maybe we should start our own "cancelling" of people. Those lazy asses that game the system and MORE importantly, those lazy asses that create policy that entice it! ... AT OUR (kids) EXPENSE.I think most of the anger at that point should be directed at those who are borrowing trillions of dollars in the credit of our children and grandchildren so that people can sit at home when there is clearly work available literally everywhere. That being said, yeah, we should be angry at people who are capable of working but won't.
Bunch of entitled assholes, "well that job does not pay enough", well, in a just world it would pay more than the zero that your lazy ass should be receiving to sit at home. There is a time and place for welfare, this ain't it.
Twenty's original post says that BW3 is offering above what all the lefties have been saying is a "fair" minimum wage by a few dollars an hour. And people are turning it down...not because the wage is not good at that point, but because the extra $80 a week is not worth it to get off their lazy ass. Why go to all that trouble to go earn your money when a little scrimping here and there can let you be at home all day?
It would be one thing if we were in the middle of a depression and work was hard to come by, but you cannot go out these days without tripping on a help wanted sign. And last I checked we had 11 million people collecting unemployment. That is not hard times, it is lazy, mooching, dickheads.
I'm not blaming the individual - people act in their best interests. If it pays more to sit on their ass than work a crappy job, I'm sure I'd do the same. Actually, I've worked plenty of crappy jobs in my life, but if I didn't, I didn't eat. That's the difference between then and now.Not to start a fight here, but you would be mad at someone for getting paid more if they made more money sitting at home then working a dead end job like at a restraint? Shouldn't the job pay more to entice the unemployed to want to work there?
How is that smart thinking money wise for the individual at home?
I am not downtown as much anymore but I can tell you my area (Noblesville/Fishers) is hiring everywhere. The restaurants are open and they almost all want employees. That goes from fast food to the higher end establishments.
Marion County is a different animal though because Hogsett is taking longer to open Indy back up. So I cannot speak for Indy.
You forgot your specialty - collecting bull semen.I can churn butter, hand-milk a cow, pluck a chicken, help build a barn, and clean a squirrel.
Mad Amish skills
Just went to lunch at a little town outside Charlotte.Maybe they’re waiting it out. My buddy owns a half a dozen restaurants and he related between the “price of protein” and shortage of staff he was better off during the shutdown. Hyperbole a bit but who knows. I bet people saved money not going out, got stimulus, unemployment and aren’t desperate yet. I bet this fall we see a return to normalcy