so, the team with the best talent wins? why do they play the games?Laughable. Thanks for clearing up your NBA knowledge if you think the Pacers were the better team.
The only player that could start on a healthy Boston team is maybe Haliburton.
so, the team with the best talent wins? why do they play the games?Laughable. Thanks for clearing up your NBA knowledge if you think the Pacers were the better team.
The only player that could start on a healthy Boston team is maybe Haliburton.
“….maybe Haliburton”. Now you sound laughable.
so, the team with the best talent wins? why do they play the games?
“….maybe Haliburton”. Now you sound laughable.
they were better in this series, try watching the gamesUpsets happen. But best of 7 series are meant to limit those.
The Pacers just got swept and your take is they are the better team…. Sure.
they were better in this series, try watching the games
so is officiating, I guess next you will tell me the Pacers got a fair whistle. Boston overall probably is the better team, but for the 1st 4 games of the series they were outplayed.I did thanks. I also saw the Pacers fold in the last 2 minutes of 3 of the 4 games.
Guess you may have missed that part.
Boston was light years better in crunch time, which is part of the game too.
so is officiating, I guess next you will tell me the Pacers got a fair whistle. Boston overall probably is the better team, but for the 1st 4 games of the series they were outplayed.
Lol. God, I bet you're such a a Boston homer that you believe their bench is also superior. White? Horford? An aging Holliday? Yeah, no way Siakim, Turner, and even Nembhard (who outshone all three Celtics starters I just listed) could start for Boston? Just even dumber than your original post I replied to. Just stop. They won the series because of Brown and Tatum and Haliburton being out. Period.Laughable. Thanks for clearing up your NBA knowledge if you think the Pacers were the better team.
The only player that could start on a healthy Boston team is maybe Haliburton.
Lol. God, I bet you're such a a Boston homer that you believe their bench is also superior. White? Horford? An aging Holliday? Yeah, no way Siakim, Turner, and even Nembhard (who outshone all three Celtics starters I just listed) could start for Boston? Just even dumber than your original post I replied to. Just stop. They won the series because of Brown and Tatum and Haliburton being out. Period.
Though you're probably correct, your posts on the Celtics are about as boring as watching the Celtics play basketball. Not your fault it's just that Boston bores the ELS out of me.. iso iso iso ... zzzzzzzzzzzzzzBoston Homer? I guarantee if you asked every GM and coach in the league if nembhard would start over Holiday or White, you would be laughed out of the room.
Again, a healthy Celtics team I said. Porzingis is better than Turner. If you disagree with that you are the Homer.
Tatum was 1st team All NBA so yes, better than Siakam.
Brown has been routinely listed as the biggest snub from the All-NBA teams.
White and Holiday are the best defensive backcourt in the league.
If you think Nembhard is better than those two, then that’s why your team was 26th in D this year.
But sure, I am the Homer. You are the one who thinks Holiday is “aging” and not one of the most versatile guards in the league.
Though you're probably correct, your posts on the Celtics are about as boring as watching the Celtics play basketball. Not your fault it's just that Boston bores the ELS out of me.. iso iso iso ... zzzzzzzzzzzzzz