ADVERTISEMENT

IU bought a team per Sen Tuber ille

Jssanto

All-American
Feb 15, 2019
5,344
5,129
113
New Orleans

I understand the dislike of the way NIL has gone. But his phrasing, to me, makes it seem as if we did something wrong. I completely agree there should be changes. Tuberville blames Chuck Shummer for blocking his efforts at reform.
My guess is both sides of the isle are crooks. But the rules are the rules.
 

I understand the dislike of the way NIL has gone. But his phrasing, to me, makes it seem as if we did something wrong. I completely agree there should be changes. Tuberville blames Chuck Shummer for blocking his efforts at reform.
My guess is both sides of the isle are crooks. But the rules are the rules.
Dude, can you correct the spelling of the asshole's name in the thread title? This thread should be getting more attention.

This makes me livid. What an outrageous accusation. Fvck Tuberville and the other SEC crybabies.
 
Dude, can you correct the spelling of the asshole's name in the thread title? This thread should be getting more attention.

This makes me livid. What an outrageous accusation. Fvck Tuberville and the other SEC crybabies.
If he wants consequences for breaking a contract, then there must be guarantees from the other side that contracts won't be rescinded.
 
They literally are throwing the kitchen sink at IU.
It's unbelievable. The SEC, with several two-loss teams (and some of those teams will ultimately be three-loss teams), is publicly campaigning for inclusion in the first field of 12 CFP. Now they've got a low-IQ United States senator involved who, in an apparent effort to bolster the conference's position, is denigrating IU. Screw this guy and all the whiny SEC idiots.
 
If he wants consequences for breaking a contract, then there must be guarantees from the other side that contracts won't be rescinded.
I have no problem with NIL money being tied to contracts (which would, among things, prevent players from opting out of bowl games), but what Tuberville is doing is something very different. He's made a false and outrageous claim that we've "bought" our success this season, suggesting wrongdoing. Fvck him. I'm furious.
 

I understand the dislike of the way NIL has gone. But his phrasing, to me, makes it seem as if we did something wrong. I completely agree there should be changes. Tuberville blames Chuck Shummer for blocking his efforts at reform.
My guess is both sides of the isle are crooks. But the rules are the rules.
I bet IU got the best value for its dollars. Most of the portal guys we got were not ranked very high out of high school and nobody was going to pay top dollar for them. And certainly our freshmen recruits weren’t 4-5 star kids who could demand top dollar.

It was Cignetti and his coaching staff’s keen eye for talent, then great coaching, that put IU where they are, not 5 star talent and big bucks.
 
I have no problem with NIL money being tied to contracts (which would, among things, prevent players from opting out of bowl games), but what Tuberville is doing is something very different. He's made a false and outrageous claim that we've "bought" our success this season, suggesting wrongdoing. Fvck him. I'm furious.
Yeah. It amuses me how uncomfortable everyone else is with our success. What we really bought was a coach. Yes, our talent level has increased, but I've always felt the talent we had in the past should have brought better results.
 
Yeah. It amuses me how uncomfortable everyone else is with our success. What we really bought was a coach. Yes, our talent level has increased, but I've always felt the talent we had in the past should have brought better results.
Allen was 3-9 last year, I've often wondered what Cignetti would've done with that team. That team lost a bunch of close games that better coaching would've pulled out the W.

Kevin Wilson lost a bunch of games that a better coach would've won. Thank goodness Cignetti is our head coach!!!
 
I’d love it if Cig was asked about this comment. His response would be short and sweet like “Coaching is about developing and motivating your players. You can’t buy that.”
The thing is he's got a bunch of guys nobody else was seriously interested in. Oh sure, we had to pay top dollar for all those JMU guys. Tuberville's comment is such bullshit.

As someone suggested above, Cignetti is a master at identifying and recruiting talent that others can't see.
 
Saturday’s game will be about who believes in themselves more, who wants it more,

than hs recruiting stars. It IS more about what is the between the ears.

The winners will get 1st all big 10 team nods; the losers will get 2nd and 3rd.

Our All Big Contenders include Fisher, Kamara, Ponds, West, Rourke, Sarrat, Price, Ellison, Horton …

It’s not a one player show … and everyone has improved … FPI won’t win or lose the game.

IU will score more points on OSU than OSU has given up in a single game so far.
 
Yes, IU and its ‘moneyball’ picks are playing for championships.

Some SEC teams with NIL all stars are on the outside looking in …

The SEC doesn’t get to stack the deck this year …

Hard to get past an Auburn coach is complaining about the SEC not getting six in.
 
Last edited:
Allen was 3-9 last year, I've often wondered what Cignetti would've done with that team. That team lost a bunch of close games that better coaching would've pulled out the W.

Kevin Wilson lost a bunch of games that a better coach would've won. Thank goodness Cignetti is our head coach!!!
Cignetti hasn't had to deal with many close games yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vesuvius13
"That was a little bit forbidden when I was in coaching, but now it's legal." No Tommy, you $EC cheating f---, that was completely illegal when you were coaching. The whole issue that you and all the other 2 loss cheating f---- in the $EC have is that now everyone can openly do what that dirty ass conference has been doing for decades.
 
Saturday’s game will be about who believes in themselves more, who wants it more,

than hs recruiting stars. It IS more about what is the between the ears.

The winners will get 1st all big 10 team nods; the losers will get 2nd and 3rd.

Our All Big Contenders include Fisher, Kamara, Ponds, West, Rourke, Sarrat, Price, Ellison, Horton …

It’s not a one player show … and everyone has improved … FPI won’t win or lose the game.

IU will score more points on OSU than OSU has given up in a single game so far.
I think IU's offense is good enough to score 13 points on OSU, and I think our defense may be able to hold OSU to around 25.

But we can't forecast the breaks (bad penalty calls, missed field goals, fumbles, interceptions, long returns etc.) and that'll be where the game is decided.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IU73
Maybe a bit counter intuitive, but I kind of feel like NIL and transfer portal are actually creating more parity and not less. While yes, big name schools are going to poach good players from lesser programs, on the whole, there’s a net drain from the from the big name schools which are experiencing more transfers out than in. They are losing quality depth and experience among the 2nd/3rd string which has probably been a larger contributor to their historical advantage than NFL draft pick starters
 
Here's an article that speaks to the topic:

Oh God. Hickory again.

A fictional high school (not a college) in the 1950's ( 70+ years ago). What a cliche. What? No reference to Branch McCracken?? Breaking Away??

OSU has about 50,000 students at its main campus. IU has about 38,000 at its main campus.

Those are big mega-university numbers. What a silly, foolish comparison to "Hickory."
 
  • Like
Reactions: midwolfe
Oh God. Hickory again.

A fictional high school (not a college) in the 1950's ( 70+ years ago). What a cliche. What? No reference to Branch McCracken?? Breaking Away??

OSU has about 50,000 students at its main campus. IU has about 38,000 at its main campus.

Those are big mega-university numbers. What a silly, foolish comparison to "Hickory."
Surprisingly IUB had record enrollment this fall. 48,424 per the IDS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vesuvius13
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT