The devil is always in the details and the four column listing provided by USA Today is hardly detailed enough to draw the conclusion some have that we are both flush with cash and operating at high margins. Even a cursory glance at the information leads one to that conclusion.The arguments you make are compelling, you're right it's definitely not as simple as Dolson having an extra $30 million to put into any sport he wants, and we've still yet to see where all this money ends up. I stand by the principle of what I wrote which is that this USA Today report only furthers my question marks around the athletic department's commitment to football, but it is hard to judge fully without letting time pass a little and gaining more context as to where that money is intended to go.
The smug arrogance from the people on this thread who agree with you adds essentially no value other than showing some people feel an innate sense of superiority because they're willing to $10 a month for a few extra articles, which is pretty laughable to say the least.