Hunter Biden is going to skate with his sweetheart deal.Hunter Biden is literally on trial right now.
Hunter Biden is going to skate with his sweetheart deal.Hunter Biden is literally on trial right now.
Well, it's really easy for you to always be right when you know the future.Hunter Biden is going to skate with his sweetheart deal.
Since when don’t politicians know what they’re saying is bullshit?The indictment makes a very strong case (starting at paragraph 11) that he knew everything he was saying was BS.
The gun charge and the future immunity both gave prosecution indigestion. Let me ask though how do you loyalists not see anything wrong with the Green Bay Sweep and January 6- if it was Biden or donkey doing that I can only imagine the outcryHow much you want to bet they will bring same deal back except he’s gets no immunity from all future prosecutions? BUT the DOJ will wink and tell Hunter not to worry because they won’t bring charges in the future.
Want to make a bet on what posted a couple posts above?Well, it's really easy for you to always be right when you know the future.
I am not a loyalist.The gun charge and the future immunity both gave prosecution indigestion. Let me ask though how do you loyalists not see anything wrong with the Green Bay Sweep and January 6- if it was Biden or donkey doing that I can only imagine the outcry
It will be interesting to see if he admits he knew his claims were wrongThe indictment claims he knew they were wrong. Check out pgs. 6-9.
What gives you any indication the DOJ has been weaponized? Garland was getting killed by Dems for NOT doing anything. As for the FBI? They are traditionally white, male, middle aged and often with a military background. Doesn’t seem to be the demographics for a left, partisan group as you imply.So we disagree.
Now that the Dems have weaponized the DOJ and FBI, the Republicans will do the same when they get a chance. Too bad for all of us.
I answered your first questionLet me try this again. Maybe I wasn’t clear.
Has Trump admitted his claims were wrong?
Can it be proven that he made public claims he knew were wrong?
As I’ve said earlier…he has a problem admitting when he has made an error. He also has a problem admitting when he’s lost.
I’m trying to align my previous statements with these questions.
You said “daily”.
We don't always have a voice in who the candidates are. We do have a choice who we vote for in November. Voting for Trump in 2016 seems reasonable, despite his lack of qualifications. Voting for Trump in 2020 was laughable. Voting for him in 2024 is borderline dangerous and irresponsible.Ye, pretty pathetic Biden and Trump might be the choices.
So what? Trump's knowledge of his dishonesty is an important part of the charges against him. Schiff's honesty or dishonesty is irrelevant.Since when don’t politicians know what they’re saying is bullshit?
Schiff did it day after day during the Russian Collusion Hearing.
Except the BidensNope, democracy got a shot in the arm last evening. Nobody is above the law.
But what about Hunter? A. He’s not running for public office. B. He’s been charged on two counts. So how do you figure that’s above the law?Nobody above the law? So far Hunter Biden is above the law.
I answered his question on this withThe indictment makes a very strong case (starting at paragraph 11) that he knew everything he was saying was BS.
Garland responded after getting killed. I have no idea what race has to do with this.What gives you any indication the DOJ has been weaponized? Garland was getting killed by Dems for NOT doing anything. As for the FBI? They are traditionally white, male, middle aged and often with a military background. Doesn’t seem to be the demographics for a left, partisan group as you imply.
And how exactly is that supposed to work? When no one announces the existence of any secret wink-wink agreement between DOJ and Hunter, do I win because it doesn't exist, or do you win because obviously they are just keeping it from the public?Want to make a bet on what posted a couple posts above?
Evidently you missed the part about the judge throwing out the sweetheart deal he and his defense made with the prosecution.But what about Hunter? A. He’s not running for public office. B. He’s been charged on two counts. So how do you figure that’s above the law?
You think they'll allow him to testify?It will be interesting to see if he admits he knew his claims were wrong
I’d assume his attorneys will try that, since some of them were at least pretending to him that they think he won. Too many people telling him what he wanted to hear.It will be interesting to see if he admits he knew his claims were wrong
No, what makes you think I missed that?Evidently you missed the part about the judge throwing out the sweetheart deal he and his defense made with the prosecution.
Do you ever think the DOJ has more information and a better understanding of the law than you do? Maybe they're building a stronger case. Maybe there is no 'there' there.How much you want to bet they will bring same deal back except he’s gets no immunity from all future prosecutions? BUT the DOJ will wink and tell Hunter not to worry because they won’t bring charges in the future.
Forget wink wink. Hunter will get the same slap on hands as first agreement. No jail time.And how exactly is that supposed to work? When no one announces the existence of any secret wink-wink agreement between DOJ and Hunter, do I win because it doesn't exist, or do you win because obviously they are just keeping it from the public?
lol If lying or spreading lies is a crime, encircle DC and indict every person in it.Since when don’t politicians know what they’re saying is bullshit?
Schiff did it day after day during the Russian Collusion Hearing.
Because you'd know that was Hunter being above the law.No, what makes you think I missed that?
Maybe, but that doesn't prove he's above the law. It just proves he's got the right to the same due process as the rest of us.Forget wink wink. Hunter will get the same slap on hands as first agreement. No jail time.
No "there" there, as in they don't have him dead to rights on the charges? We know enough to know that is certainly not true.Do you ever think the DOJ has more information and a better understanding of the law than you do? Maybe they're building a stronger case. Maybe there is no 'there' there.
Demographics is about more than race, as I listed. As for race, surely you know how race plays a part in politics traditionally.Garland responded after getting killed. I have no idea what race has to do with this.
Yep, perfect example of a two-tier system of justice.So what? Trump's knowledge of his dishonesty is an important part of the charges against him. Schiff's honesty or dishonesty is irrelevant.
IT's not a deal, its just that we won't investigate.How much you want to bet they will bring same deal back except he’s gets no immunity from all future prosecutions? BUT the DOJ will wink and tell Hunter not to worry because they won’t bring charges in the future.
Has Trump admitted he’s made an error?I answered your first question
I will answer the second...again Obviously.
Move along.
Note the filing date: August 1, 2023 (yesterday). Obviously, the indictment was made public the same day it was filed (yesterday).
Yeah, the same guy everyone says can't admit he's wrong is going around telling people he lost?Has Trump admitted he’s made an error?
Has Trump admitted he lost…publicly?
If the answer is no and no then how is the answer to the other questions yes and yes.
I’m just looking for those citations.
I think we would agree that he has a problem saying he’s ever wrong or that he’s ever lost.
I think Bloom was referring to Hunter Biden's legal woes.No, we don't know that.
Yeah, I screwed up and misunderstood. Sorry.I think Bloom was referring to Hunter Biden's legal woes.
I doubt that he ever has publicly but in small groups he has. Pence and others took notes when they net with him. Possibly because they knew something like this was likely down the road.Has Trump admitted he’s made an error?
Has Trump admitted he lost…publicly?
If the answer is no and no then how is the answer to the other questions yes and yes.
I’m just looking for those citations.
I think we would agree that he has a problem saying he’s ever wrong or that he’s ever lost.
We’re just not going to agree about Hunter’s preferential treatment. I guess you believe the whistleblowers lied.Maybe, but that doesn't prove he's above the law. It just proves he's got the right to the same due process as the rest of us.
Nobody wants him to testify. He’s a loose cannonYou think they'll allow him to testify?
They must not feel they have the proof to proceed. I'm sure y'all know more than the DOJ though. Just like when Trump was President and Hillary was indicted.No "there" there, as in they don't have him dead to rights on the charges? We know enough to know that is certainly not true.
As I've said for two years, Trump knew he was lying about election fraud, but also knew his loyal Trumpsters would believe it.The indictment makes a very strong case (starting at paragraph 11) that he knew everything he was saying was BS.