Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pretty surprised Hillman was the biggest Woodson guy ever before.
100% Hillman was his biggest fan. Hillman said we had to hire an IU guy to win again.Yep. Woody needs to turn things around pretty quickly. If he's losing guys like Hillman, that's not good.
He has a track record of making three sweet sixeteens which has been the IU ceiling for over 20 years. I think Woodson's ceiling was last year in the round of 32. I most certainly think he would have been better than Woodson but I also do not think we would be making any final fours with him either.Alford would have been a better hire if the absolute plan was to get an IU guy. His tournament success is lackluster, yet he’s won nearly 700 games. The Alford name resonates with high school coaches across the state. Not saying he would have been a homerun hire, yet if the plan was to pacify former players, then this would have been a much better hire than Woodson.
Alford has already been handed the keys to basketball power and blew it. And UCLA has had more success than IU over the past 30 years. IU has been shitty since before RMK was fired.Alford would have been a better hire if the absolute plan was to get an IU guy. His tournament success is lackluster, yet he’s won nearly 700 games. The Alford name resonates with high school coaches across the state. Not saying he would have been a homerun hire, yet if the plan was to pacify former players, then this would have been a much better hire than Woodson.
Evans was spot on in every thing he said, moreso than Hillman . And Coyle talks too much.
New Jersey, the hotbed of high school basketball.Rutgers also leads the all time series against IU. Let that sink in for a minute.
Agree about Coyle. He's got Hillman and Evans there. Two Hoosier legends. No one watched that video to listen to Coyle.Evans was spot on in every thing he said, moreso than Hillman . And Coyle talks too much.
Listening now. They are 100% right whent they say there is no shooting and NO accountability. Woodson is the furthest thing from the old IU if you ask me. If I did not know he went to IU I would just guess he is any old coach from somewhere else. No culture. No pride. Sloppy play, etc.Evans was spot on in every thing he said, moreso than Hillman . And Coyle talks too much.
Coyle said it was now 8-8, but our frustration is still understandable.Rutgers also leads the all time series against IU. Let that sink in for a minute.
I’ll never understand the mindset of “we have to hire an IU guy.”Alford would have been a better hire if the absolute plan was to get an IU guy. His tournament success is lackluster, yet he’s won nearly 700 games. The Alford name resonates with high school coaches across the state. Not saying he would have been a homerun hire, yet if the plan was to pacify former players, then this would have been a much better hire than Woodson.
Thank God IU didn't hire Alford.Alford would have been a better hire if the absolute plan was to get an IU guy. His tournament success is lackluster, yet he’s won nearly 700 games. The Alford name resonates with high school coaches across the state. Not saying he would have been a homerun hire, yet if the plan was to pacify former players, then this would have been a much better hire than Woodson.
You have no clue what he demands or doesn't so quit acting like you do. Everything in your post is assumption based on watching the team a few hours a week, and more so a winning or losing record. We lost, except it and move on and quit trying to find blame in every nook and cranny. The fault lies in the L on the record, not your paranoid ignorant assumptions....What’s surprising to me is that here our coach came up through the BK School of Hard Knocks, yet he doesn’t demand that same toughness from his players. Does he not understand what worked, like Painter apparently does? Has the NBA game soured his thought process? Does he not realize how difficult the college game is to teach to more inexperienced youth?
That podcast was tough to listen to with the simultaneously competing other banter. What was that production snafu all about? Are these podcasts frequently like that?
Dumb. As in “except it” dumb.You have no clue what he demands or doesn't so quit acting like you do. Everything in your post is assumption based on watching the team a few hours a week, and more so a winning or losing record. We lost, except it and move on and quit trying to find blame in every nook and cranny. The fault lies in the L on the record, not your paranoid ignorant assumptions....
I see enough to know Woodson doesn't demand a poorly performing player sit his ass on the bench as a motivational tool. That is the toughness of a coach I speak of. Did you even listen to the podcast to know what Evans and Hillman kept saying, that Woodson doesn't hold players accountable out of fear they'll transfer if pissed off? Do you have a permanent bur lodged up your butt or just what? Have you ever considered tweezers?You have no clue what he demands or doesn't so quit acting like you do. Everything in your post is assumption based on watching the team a few hours a week, and more so a winning or losing record. We lost, except it and move on and quit trying to find blame in every nook and cranny. The fault lies in the L on the record, not your paranoid ignorant assumptions....
Head coaches tune this stuff out. They have to. They are always being criticized and second-guessed. Head coaches are confident that they know what they are doing.Agree, this is a bad sign. I wonder how much Woody lives in a vacuum. Think this type of stuff gets back to him given it is coming from 2 former players?
It's been so long the times have changed. Knight's coaching methodology would no longer be accepted. It's a new paradigm in the way of thinking. Demanding coaches are dying dinosaurs stuck in today's changing climate of correctness. I'll say it again, IU missed the boat with Alford and now his ship has sailed. Woodson was already coasting on Easy St. when IU pulled him over for a quick fix. He's been too many years pampered by the NBA good life.I think we're so far removed from RMK at this point that people no longer care about an "IU Guy" anymore. They just want a good program.
RMK wasn't even an IU guy. IU is supposed to be in a position where they can get a proven head coach. If the coach isn't cutting it after 3-4 years, go find a proven commodity and pay him: if we have learned anything since RMK, it is this.Agree. That's why the Dusty May talk is premature. When the time comes to get the next coach after Woody, don't get the best "IU Guy." Just get the best guy, period!
Woody has shown that getting a former IU guy means nothing. Even if he was having greater success, what he's doing resembles nothing like the old IU program.
I think we're so far removed from RMK at this point that people no longer care about an "IU Guy" anymore. They just want a good program.
I think alot of these former IU guys like Hillman who were screaming to have an IU guy hired were expecting a hard nosed tough coach. I think they are now realizing they did not get what they thought they were going to get. That is why they are now kind of turning on WoodsonAgree. That's why the Dusty May talk is premature. When the time comes to get the next coach after Woody, don't get the best "IU Guy." Just get the best guy, period!
Woody has shown that getting a former IU guy means nothing. Even if he was having greater success, what he's doing resembles nothing like the old IU program.
I think we're so far removed from RMK at this point that people no longer care about an "IU Guy" anymore. They just want a good program.
Hind site on coaching hires always leads to opinions that cannot be proven.Alford would have been a better hire if the absolute plan was to get an IU guy. His tournament success is lackluster, yet he’s won nearly 700 games. The Alford name resonates with high school coaches across the state. Not saying he would have been a homerun hire, yet if the plan was to pacify former players, then this would have been a much better hire than Woodson.
That just doesn't make sense. If a player threatens to transfer, let him transfer. Good luck. Who is going to take any of IUs players if the reason they are leaving is that Woodson is too demanding?I see enough to know Woodson doesn't demand a poorly performing player sit his ass on the bench as a motivational tool. That is the toughness of a coach I speak of. Did you even listen to the podcast to know what Evans and Hillman kept saying, that Woodson doesn't hold players accountable out of fear they'll transfer if pissed off? Do you have a permanent bur lodged up your butt or just what? Have you ever considered tweezers?
I really disagree with your response. I saw nothing suggesting paranoia. And this was much more than a loss. This was embarrassment on a national level. The quality of our play in one game will be forgotten, but the actions of X will be remembered and episodically referred to for a life time.You have no clue what he demands or doesn't so quit acting like you do. Everything in your post is assumption based on watching the team a few hours a week, and more so a winning or losing record. We lost, except it and move on and quit trying to find blame in every nook and cranny. The fault lies in the L on the record, not your paranoid ignorant assumptions....
Every opposing coach is also going to have trash-talking and harrassing X and getting inside his head as part of their game plan, if they didn't already. I expect we'll see him with several more ejections if he continues to play.I really disagree with your response. I saw nothing suggesting paranoia. And this was much more than a loss. This was embarrassment on a national level. The quality of our play in one game will be forgotten, but the actions of X will be remembered and episodically referred to for a life time.
I thought the same thing. But then I considered the except sometimes means to exclude something. So, in that context, at least to me, his comment makes sense.Dumb. As in “except it” dumb.
you don't need to hire an IU guy. If he does things the right way and wins, he becomes an IU guy.I’ll never understand the mindset of “we have to hire an IU guy.”
Knight was an OSU guy.
Smith was a Kansas guy.
Wooden was a Purdue guy.
K was a West Point guy.
I have nothing against hiring an IU guy. But that seems like a tiebreaker kind of qualification.
You hire the right guy - and if you only consider alums, you’ve unnecessarily limited yourself from getting him.
That's what the two former IU players said, coaches are afraid to upset players out of fear they'll transfer. They said, let 'em transfer then, is what coaches like Woodson should do. The trouble is he doesn't, out of fear losing them.That just doesn't make sense. If a player threatens to transfer, let him transfer. Good luck. Who is going to take any of IUs players if the reason they are leaving is that Woodson is too demanding?
I doubt he knows who Evans and Hillman are..Agree, this is a bad sign. I wonder how much Woody lives in a vacuum. Think this type of stuff gets back to him given it is coming from 2 former players?
Johnson will be starting next game. Book itThat's what the two former IU players said, coaches are afraid to upset players out of fear they'll transfer. They said, let 'em transfer then, is what coaches like Woodson should do. The trouble is he doesn't, out of fear losing them.
He shouild. Hillman has a ring - Woody doesn't.I doubt he knows who Evans and Hillman are..
Let them go. What we'd have left are guys who want to be here and are willing to be coached.I don’t disagree with what Hillman and Evan said. But it shouldn’t be forgotten that players now can take their ball and go home because they’re unhappy or go somewhere else because they can be paid more money.