I hope he gets himself righted or I could see his minutes wane. Leal can provide more than that. Once they play better teams, IU can ill afford to have him launching zeros.
Illinois upgraded that shooter spot by getting HumrichousI hope he gets himself righted or I could see his minutes wane. Leal can provide more than that. Once they play better teams, IU can ill afford to have him launching zeros.
His Minutes should go down he can't defend and Tucker is better.I hope he gets himself righted or I could see his minutes wane. Leal can provide more than that. Once they play better teams, IU can ill afford to have him launching zeros.
The thread title you so brilliantly created and your premise are both dumb.I hope he gets himself righted or I could see his minutes wane. Leal can provide more than that. Once they play better teams, IU can ill afford to have him launching zeros.
Yeah, but he doesn't make shots, I hope that part kicks in soon. This team could play smaller and play less of Goode. I hope he hits a big one next week and gets going.He'll get going........he's doing more in terms of moving the ball and rebounding than I expected. He's also working hard on D. I like him more than Kopp.
The rotation might be as you say "what have you done for me lately", but bear in mind that includes practices for the coaching staff.Like most I think Mgbako is a 4. The more games I watch the more certain I am of that. I also believe that line-ups, rotations and minutes should be a "what have you done for me lately" situation. Including Goose, we have an 8 player rotation.
We upgraded your posting by getting a dweeby nerd who has never been to a game.Illinois upgraded that shooter spot by getting Humrichous
Until Humrichous has to guard faster and more athletic wings. Trade offs with everything. But sure, Humrichous is probably a more effective outside shooter.Illinois upgraded that shooter spot by getting Humrichous
If he is asked to do that..he is starting at the 4 for Illinois. 9/20 from 3 so far.Until Humrichous has to guard faster and more athletic wings. Trade offs with everything. But sure, Humrichous is probably a more effective outside shooter.
Cool storyWe upgraded your posting by getting a dweeby nerd who has never been to a game.
Might not ever come to light...but Underwood's normal higher pressure defense could end up exposing Humrichous a little bit more than it would have Goode. The trade off of better shooting may also be worth the dip in perimeter defense as well.If he is asked to do that..he is starting at the 4 for Illinois. 9/20 from 3 so far.
Possibly…scoring vs defense…opposing 4’s have to guard him on the perimeter also. IU will need to go small with maybe MM guarding him instead of MalikMight not ever come to light...but Underwood's normal higher pressure defense could end up exposing Humrichous a little bit more than it would have Goode. The trade off of better shooting may also be worth the dip in perimeter defense as well.
Not much difference in career 3 point shooting. Goode actually made more last year with a slightly lower %. He’s a Hoosier so give me him.Might not ever come to light...but Underwood's normal higher pressure defense could end up exposing Humrichous a little bit more than it would have Goode. The trade off of better shooting may also be worth the dip in perimeter defense as well.
MM isn't that much smaller than MR. Same height 10 lbs. Not sure he's quicker either.Possibly…scoring vs defense…opposing 4’s have to guard him on the perimeter also. IU will need to go small with maybe MM guarding him instead of Malik
But he does space the floor regardless if he shoots or not, unless the opposing team wants to gamble on him consistently missing.Goode was not some kind of crazy sharpshooter at Illinois. He'll make one or two per game on average. He won't go for 17 or something like that. He's a nice rotation piece that will help keep a lead when he comes in. But he's not some kind of instant offense or someone that will stretch leads or make up deficits.
He made 61 3’s last year in his 20 mpg. He will draw attention. Next step is knocking them down.But he does space the floor regardless if he shoots or not, unless the opposing team wants to gamble on him consistently missing.
He's a decent athlete. He takes care of the ball reasonably well. He can rebound pretty well for a wing. And he's a shooting threat. He'll have a game here and there where he makes 2-3 of them...but even when he doesn't, other teams likely won't play off him too much. And that should leave some space for others to attack. As you said, he's a nice depth rotation piece. Galloway and Tucker are the guys that are capable of impacting games off the bench scoring wise. Goode helps keep the rotation solid.Goode was not some kind of crazy sharpshooter at Illinois. He'll make one or two per game on average. He won't go for 17 or something like that. He's a nice rotation piece that will help keep a lead when he comes in. But he's not some kind of instant offense or someone that will stretch leads or make up deficits.
But he does space the floor regardless if he shoots or not, unless the opposing team wants to gamble on him consistently missing.
He's a decent athlete. He takes care of the ball reasonably well. He can rebound pretty well for a wing. And he's a shooting threat. He'll have a game here and there where he makes 2-3 of them...but even when he doesn't, other teams likely won't play off him too much. And that should leave some space for others to attack. As you said, he's a nice depth rotation piece. Galloway and Tucker are the guys that are capable of impacting games off the bench scoring wise. Goode helps keep the rotation solid.
Yea I agree with you he's a role player, and that role is shooting 3s and spacing the floor. Perfect for the 8th man in the rotation.Right. He's a nice player, but I don't think some of the expectations for him I read here are in line with what he's done in his career. Someone in another thread hoped for maybe one three per half from him. That's more realistic I think.
and in situations where they double from wing spots, a perfect counter to pair him with Mack on one side, and him on the other. Either gamble or double from somewhere else.He's a decent athlete. He takes care of the ball reasonably well. He can rebound pretty well for a wing. And he's a shooting threat. He'll have a game here and there where he makes 2-3 of them...but even when he doesn't, other teams likely won't play off him too much. And that should leave some space for others to attack. As you said, he's a nice depth rotation piece. Galloway and Tucker are the guys that are capable of impacting games off the bench scoring wise. Goode helps keep the rotation solid.
MM plays on the perimeter and guards perimeter guys..Malik doesn’t usuallyMM isn't that much smaller than MR. Same height 10 lbs. Not sure he's quicker either.
I like Mack’s feet on D this year. Sliding much better. Better than Malik I’d say at guarding wings on the perimeter.MM isn't that much smaller than MR. Same height 10 lbs. Not sure he's quicker either.
He also understands where to position much better than last year. You can always tell when they aren't so sure when they have happy feet and dancing. He doesn't do that anymore, he understands where he needs to be and how far he can cover.I like Mack’s feet on D this year. Sliding much better. Better than Malik I’d say at guarding wings on the perimeter.
Really like what he has become.He also understands where to position much better than last year. You can always tell when they aren't so sure when they have happy feet and dancing. He doesn't do that anymore, he understands where he needs to be and how far he can cover.