I thought Luke Goode was a decent 3 point shooter at Illinois. He guns and he guns but none go in. He rebounds okay but that is about all he adds.
- Thread starter Tru2Irish
- Start date
He'll get going........he's doing more in terms of moving the ball and rebounding than I expected. He's also working hard on D. I like him more than Kopp.
His Minutes should go down he can't defend and Tucker is better.
The thread title you so brilliantly created and your premise are both dumb.
As in D.U.M.B.
Yeah, but he doesn't make shots, I hope that part kicks in soon. This team could play smaller and play less of Goode. I hope he hits a big one next week and gets going.
Like most I think Mgbako is a 4. The more games I watch the more certain I am of that. I also believe that line-ups, rotations and minutes should be a "what have you done for me lately" situation. Including Goose, we have an 8 player rotation.
The rotation might be as you say "what have you done for me lately", but bear in mind that includes practices for the coaching staff.
Until Humrichous has to guard faster and more athletic wings. Trade offs with everything. But sure, Humrichous is probably a more effective outside shooter.
If he is asked to do that..he is starting at the 4 for Illinois. 9/20 from 3 so far.
Might not ever come to light...but Underwood's normal higher pressure defense could end up exposing Humrichous a little bit more than it would have Goode. The trade off of better shooting may also be worth the dip in perimeter defense as well.
