In the midst of ALL of these various accomplices "flipping" on Trump, I got to wondering how do Trump defenders maintain belief in his innocence?
What do people who continue to defend Trump think that all of these folks who have agreed to cooperate and testify against him are seeking immunity from? Pretty remarkable coincidence if they are all ganging up on an innocent man, especially since perjury would invalidate their plea deals...
Is the belief that only these folks taking plea deals are guilty of the crimes they're accused of and Trump is a completely innocent man who is being railroaded? That he tried (and Failed) to prevent a number of his associates from engaging in criminal activity, and in exchange they are making false accusations against him in retaliation?
When someone like Jenna Ellis tearfully confesses and blames her actions on her misguided belief that Trump was being truthful with her, do Trump defenders grasp that she is admitting guilt? And going a step further when the respective Judge asks any of these folks copping a plea if they are entering into this agreement with the knowledge that if the case went to trial that the Prosecution would be able to prove their guilt and the accused answers yes is the typical Trump defender grasping what is being said?
If Jenna Ellis (and numerous others) admits that she is guilty,that the Prosecution would be able to prove her guilt, and then proceeds to give testimony that implicates/ties Trump to the crime she's already admitted to what degree of delusion is involved in maintaining that Trump is innocent? Again these folks aren't defiantly maintaining their innocence, but rather have admitted to committing crimes and are making a plea for a lighter punishment. If they subsequently testify and implicate Trump for the same crimes they've admitted to engaging in, how does even the most staunch Trump defender continue to ignore reality?
Even if you make the claim that his actions were not criminal, the reality is that other folks who were charged with those activities have admitted that they were crimes and that their guilt would be proven in a court of law. So do innocent people flip and implicate another innocent person? And if so how often does that occur?
What do people who continue to defend Trump think that all of these folks who have agreed to cooperate and testify against him are seeking immunity from? Pretty remarkable coincidence if they are all ganging up on an innocent man, especially since perjury would invalidate their plea deals...
Is the belief that only these folks taking plea deals are guilty of the crimes they're accused of and Trump is a completely innocent man who is being railroaded? That he tried (and Failed) to prevent a number of his associates from engaging in criminal activity, and in exchange they are making false accusations against him in retaliation?
When someone like Jenna Ellis tearfully confesses and blames her actions on her misguided belief that Trump was being truthful with her, do Trump defenders grasp that she is admitting guilt? And going a step further when the respective Judge asks any of these folks copping a plea if they are entering into this agreement with the knowledge that if the case went to trial that the Prosecution would be able to prove their guilt and the accused answers yes is the typical Trump defender grasping what is being said?
If Jenna Ellis (and numerous others) admits that she is guilty,that the Prosecution would be able to prove her guilt, and then proceeds to give testimony that implicates/ties Trump to the crime she's already admitted to what degree of delusion is involved in maintaining that Trump is innocent? Again these folks aren't defiantly maintaining their innocence, but rather have admitted to committing crimes and are making a plea for a lighter punishment. If they subsequently testify and implicate Trump for the same crimes they've admitted to engaging in, how does even the most staunch Trump defender continue to ignore reality?
Even if you make the claim that his actions were not criminal, the reality is that other folks who were charged with those activities have admitted that they were crimes and that their guilt would be proven in a court of law. So do innocent people flip and implicate another innocent person? And if so how often does that occur?