He's also a good shot.
But he is a dumb kid. Naive, but kinda dumb.
Which describes 90% of the country.
But he is a dumb kid. Naive, but kinda dumb.
Which describes 90% of the country.
While it’s true that Rittenhouse is no hero, he probably did the world a favor by killing the people he did.
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
If a kid decided to protect dc on Jan 6 and then shot up trump's mob, then would you buy that kid a beer?
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
Who called them heroes?
Also, Kyle is not a police officer, nor was he hired to protect any property there. But I guess that point is lost on you.
Oh God, Dumber has showed up.
If he shot anyone who was attacking him, sure I would.
So the police officer who shot and killed the women breaking into the house chamber. Hes a hero and you'd buy him a beer. That's great! Me too!
Were you sleeping during the Rittenhouse trial?
I don't know their exact quote, but it was something like "Hey, I'm a child molester".
Idiot.
She wasn't attacking anything except a door. She was unarmed.
She was killed in cold blood by someone who has never been investigated because the shooting was instantly declared justified.
According to your standards, the Kent State victims had it coming.
Yeah, perhaps he needs to go on CNN/MSNBC and have those Marxists treat him with the love, respect, compassion and enlightenment that they all claim to possess.... and let Kyle sue them again... and win... again! That would be awesome!
Amber, you stole my not guilty doesn't mean innocent take from last week in the Sussman debate. Get your own material!
* This take cannot be used without the expressed written consent of Eurclydon, Inc.
In other news - crazed liberal armed gunman arrested near Kavanaugh's house.
Last edited:
Can't we all just agree Rittenhouse is a dumb ass whose 15 minutes should be over?
They are both child molesters now? One was a sex offender (Rosenbaum, sex with a minor), the other was not (Huber). Another guy had his bicep blown off (Gauge). Huber and Gauge were basically the "good guys with guns" trying to stop an active shooter fleeing the scene: they should be the 2A heroes.
In my eyes, Rittenhouse committed involuntary manslaughter or reckless homicide: certainly not a saint, and murder is the worst crime a person can commit.
That's kinda the point. If the kid had simply gratefully accepted his not guilty verdict, put his head down, and got on with his life, he would have been generally forgotten about within a couple of years.
Instead, he is appearing at rallies, making controversial tweets, and making television appearances.
It's the price of fame. You either accept it with the spotlight constantly on you examining everything you say and do, or you walk away and live your life. You don't get both.
There's a reason that some actors just walk away. The constant scrutiny can absolutely affect you.
That would be a strawman, and I would expect nothing less than at least one logical fallacy from you.
My point was the 2A folks have deemed Rittenhouse a 2A hero, yet they always talk about the "good guys with guns" that never fail to stop the "bad guys with guns." According to the 2A folks, wouldn't Huber and Gauge be considered the "good guys with guns," and wouldn't it be fair for them to perceive Rittenhouse as a "bad guy with a gun" and try to stop him?
That is some Hickory-style logic. Congratulations, I thought he was one of a kind.
He is dumb but not as dumb as the fools who tried to approach him and were acting violently against him. If they were playing chicken with him I guess he won?
First it was dumb to be protesting in a violent manner that caused Rittenhouse for whatever reason go to that situation. Rittenhouse probably shouldn't have taken an assault riffle, but then again it would be better than pistols that were hidden. Third if you were there to "peacefully protest" why approach an individual with an assault riffle? They obviously thought he wouldn't act, wrong. I would have more sympathy for those killed if he wasn't branding his weapon and gave them the opportunity to turn and go the other way those idiots openly walked up to him challenged him and lost.
I just hope he doesn't spend all his money before he turns 30.
Get a life that consists of something other than going after your "enemies." Once again, there is no way you behave like this in real life, or you'd be hurting. If I tell you I'm a conservative, will you f*** off?
With all due respect. You can't say this and then follow it up with a string of posts about how you think the verdict was wrong. There is no legal basis for what you said and until people like you get that through your skulls some on the right will continue to Champion Rittenhouse.
There is absolutely a legal basis and good argument for involuntary manslaughter or reckless homicide: the State charged Rittenhouse with higher murder counts, and the judge found probable cause existed for all charges. Whether deadly force was necessary regarding Rosenbaum (an ankle biter) and even Huber, Rittenhouse was fleeing an unjustified murder, or Huber and Gauge were trying to stop somebody who committed a felony are all issues that could have gone against Rittenhouse: the trial occurred for a reason.
I don't see how calling Rittenhouse a dumb ass who needs to fade away prevents me from commenting on Rittenhouse and his trial.
Last edited:
Correct. The only thing he is is a future Republican member of Congress.
I don't even know that guy. However I think your comprehension is a little off. That poster is essentially asking a question.
He posted his gun video on Twitter and did an interview on FoxNews.
Twitter is a major part of "the media."
Fox News is a major part of "the media."
Your posts on this board are part of "the media."
If you or your church has a web site, you and/or your church are also part of "the media."
Why do you try to treat "the media" a disparaging euphemism when you personally are clearly part of it?
... or a future Republican governor of Texas.
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
Do you have trouble reading?
he said "they should be heroes to the 2nd amendment folks." He didn't say he thought they were heroes.
You really have trouble with basic concepts.
Here's what the link in the original post says is his complaint:why is he going on any network if he wants to be left alone?
why is he posting challenges to the President of the United States on a very controversial topic if he wants to be left alone?
I think he secretly enjoys the attentionbut also wants a pity party at the same time.
"We're going to make the media pay for what they did to me. They made it hard for me to live a normal life. I can't go out into public. I can't go to the store. It's hard for me to go anywhere without security," Rittenhouse said. "It made it really difficult to be normal."
If he does file suit against Zuckerberg etc. as he threatened, I hope he files a defamation-type lawsuit (instead of some other theory) so that every square-inch of his life (including any moneymaking or profiteering that he may have received) is exposed. Who is paying for his "security" that he mentioned?
Oh, I also hope his lawyer team includes Rudy Giuliani and Sydney Powell. I've heard they are outstanding.
Doesn't matter how I would do it.
Again, as I've said before, a person can't prove a point just by asking a question and assuming all the listeners/readers agree with, well, with some part of what was posted supposedly as a "question" (as you just did).
You've claimed in prior posts that you're not merely an untrained storefront minister and that you've actually been trained in how to counsel people. OK, fine.
Don't you see (as a minister and trained counselor) how Rittenhouse is marching himself down the same tragic path as George Zimmerman as first an acquitted defendant and then a perpetual "media" victim?
Rittenhouse is in need right now.
Apparently you don't see it, or maybe your politics is blocking your ability to apply your religious training to suggest how he could help himself.
LOL. I couldn't find a prison emoji but did find this one (which has somehow been suppressed almost as much as Mrs. Trump's modeling photos):
Oh isn’t open carry legal there? Already voted to get a guard. Wonder if he has more than one door? Interesting Mitch wants action TODAY because of a threat but 19 dead children, there’s no hurry to taking care of that. The hypocrisy is vomit inducing.
Lol how about he and his mother were dumb for heading across state lines with guns? That’s kind of the issue. Stay home. No problem. Oh he will spend his money and quite likely not have a very happy life. Kind of like another hero of the right, Mr Stand Your Ground guy in Florida.
Sounds like the old saying that the right to write history belongs to the victors, and the Rittenhouse supporters think they are the only victors and so can say anything they want to.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
Why The Democrats Lost/Why The Democrats Think They Lost
- Latest: MyTeamIsOnTheFloor
-
