Let's face it, FG was hired to leverage his many relationships for fund-raising purposes. Period. The guy is connected -- especially in Central Indiana. And he's not disappointed with his fund-raising at all. McRobbie must be pleased with his job performance in that realm.
Now, with that being said, with money pouring in from the Big Ten network and IU being the named state university, fund-raising should be no problem for a competent AD. Giving FG enormous kudos for recent athletic dept building projects is similar to giving CTC huge credit for his first three years at IU -- all of the pieces were in place that any number of individuals would be able to achieve the same level of success.
The public face of an AD at a large university is the performance of the flagship athletic program. At Alabama, the football program better achieve success; otherwise, the AD will be on the hot seat regardless of other job achievements. Does anybody know if Alabama has a great wrestling program? How about swim team? Soccer team? Bowling team? You get my point.
The same should be true at IU regarding men's basketball. I think it's great that other sports are successful (although I DO question how he handled the football situation and former women's basketball coach, but that's a different discussion entirely). For posters to claim that FG's other "successes" outweigh his failures regarding the basketball program is odd. Again, basketball is the flagship ATHLETIC program and he's the ATHLETIC director. How long do you think the AD would last at Duke or NC or Kentucky, if they achieved the same level of inconsistent success and relative failure in the NCAA tournament and kept the same coach. In fact, he not only kept the same coach, but had signed the coach to an outrageous extension that was so one-sided and in favor of the coach. That extension removed any flexibility on the part of the university to require greater success from the coach in the near -- they simply couldn't fire him for financial purposes. A very poor business decision, to say the least.
At Alabama, USC, Ohio State, Duke, etc... athletic programs not only add greatly to the school's revenue, but also greatly impact branding, they add to the number of students who apply to the school and can greatly raise academic standards. Heck, just look at what Butler's recent national basketball success has done for its academics. They are able to be a much more selective university and receive far more applications after their elevation to the national basketball stage. The bottom line is that from a business perspective, having an elite athletic program is good for the business of recruiting elite students.
FG has no excuse for continuing to have an inconsistent and underachieving basketball program. Like so many others, I fail to understand why FG has seemingly hitched his proverbial wagon to CTC.