Isn’t that what we did?I don’t get this reasoning.
It’s like saying “Hey, let’s hire Mike Woodson. He’s not as bad as Archie Miller. “
Isn’t that what we did?I don’t get this reasoning.
It’s like saying “Hey, let’s hire Mike Woodson. He’s not as bad as Archie Miller. “
You don't find it ironic that someone is claiming Gaetz is a 'dangerous' hire after what's happened the last 4 years?I don’t get this reasoning.
It’s like saying “Hey, let’s hire Mike Woodson. He’s not as bad as Archie Miller. “
If the dims had anything at all on Gaetz, why has he been allowed to continually shit in their mess kits for years?You don't find it ironic that someone is claiming Gaetz is a 'dangerous' hire after what's happened the last 4 years?
I've already said I am against the Gaetz pick. But when you don't recognize the 'danger' that's been going on the last 4 years, I'm going to point it out. Gaetz wouldn't be any more 'dangerous' than Garland has been.
I'll take Woody over Archie any day.
Trey Gowdy.
Remove the earnings cap would do wonders.Are they going to cut SS/Medicare benefits and/or increase FICA taxes?
If not, then they need to quit now. Posers.
Gaetz resigned so that an ethics report that was about to be released doesn't get released. It's not the Democrats, ethics investigations are bipartisan. According to some members of the House Gaetz not only messed around with a 17-year-old girl he bragged about it.If the dims had anything at all on Gaetz, who has he been allowed to continually shit in their mess kits for years?
Nothingburger.....
Sycophants get extra credit.Good pick.
IMO Trump puts loyalty to himself as an absolute must for any AG.
On the loyalty scoresheet Trey Gowdy gets only a B as Trump probably recalls Gowdy once supportef Marco Rubio for president over himself.
In contrast Matt Gaetz gets a resounding A+ for loyalty to Trump along with a willingness to go after those nasty enemy wokes as part of the political ideology/cultural wars.
As far as Democratic nominees go, he was obviously acceptable.And look at how many RINOs voted for Garland. They will not be able to justify a no vote to their constituents.
Thank you for this post. I actually do value your opinion when it comes to all things Democrats.As far as Democratic nominees go, he was obviously acceptable.
Well that's a low barAnd look at how many RINOs voted for Garland. They will not be able to justify a no vote to their constituents.
Well that explains it. Birds of a feather...House leaking information about Gaetz.
Woman testified to House Ethics Committee that Gaetz had sex with her when she was 17: Sources
The woman at the center of the DOJ's probe of Matt Gaetz testified to the House Ethics Committee that he had sex with her when she was 17 years old, sources say.abcnews.go.com
*Sigh* find a post where I say I'm against something like this. I don't have faith in Musk and Vivek to accomplish much and believe they have ulterior motives. I hope I'm wrong.You are changing the goalposts again. Your original question was you wonder how much Musk is getting paid. Now it’s something different. Musk isn’t getting paid. Either is Vivek. They will cut an enormous amount fat from government expenditures. It’s insane that people are arguing against this. Stupid actually.
Withdraw his nomination? For what? I fail to see how any of that is disqualifying in today's Republican party. Gaetz will be AG and Kash Patel in at FBI to go after the deep state. That's what their voters want and Trump will deliver. You think a few cowardly senators will stand up and say no? No chance!Gaetz likely abruptly resigned so the Ethics Committee wouldn’t release its report as planned. Because he’s been nominated Democratic and Republican Senators are wanting to see the report. That could prompt Gaetz to withdraw his nomination.