ADVERTISEMENT

Do you want X dismissed from the team?

We’ve had guys booted for much less than X has done during his 3 years in Bloomington. But that was during the Knight era. For better or worse, it’s a different day in college athletics. I am totally ambivalent on this question.
 
We’ve had guys booted for much less than X has done during his 3 years in Bloomington. But that was during the Knight era. For better or worse, it’s a different day in college athletics. I am totally ambivalent on this question.
It is a different day in sports but I also think society. Far fewer manners, less common decency, less discipline response.
 
No. That being said, I'm not going to shed any tears when he's gone next year. He is not consistent and literally took himself out of the game yesterday. I would settle for a Patrick Ewing getting into John Starks' face and chewing his ass out for getting thrown out of the game response from somebody.
 
At this point I’d be ok with it. I know that if he starts Friday night, I’m done with Woody.
I bet you he does. Woodson is soft
It is a different day in sports but I also think society. Far fewer manners, less common decency, less discipline response.
It might be but as long as you let the kids control things with zero consequenses expect it to keep happening over and over again.
 
I guarantee you that Woodson knows how things were handled by RMK and we have opinion but the internal workings of the program are speculated about but don''t always get openly communicated although in this day of social media there are a lot of so called experts about what goes on behind closed doors.

Old timers know the real story about Woodson, Tommy Baker and Roberson. Two of the three were kicked off the team after the Alaska trip. RMK gave them all chances.
 
We’ve had guys booted for much less than X has done during his 3 years in Bloomington. But that was during the Knight era. For better or worse, it’s a different day in college athletics. I am totally ambivalent on this question.
Like who? I recall threats of guys getting booted, but it seems like he often gave them another chance and I think I recall that at times he took a vote of the team to see if they wanted someone back. That whole Alaska affair that involved Woody, I don't think anyone got booted for and I think he considered it for both Coverdale and Pat Knight, but ultimately kept both. Funderburke left on his own. How did Sherron leave? But, who did he actually boot? I'm sure some of the guys that left, he encouraged them, but I don't recall guys that he actually booted?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bsmitty08
I guarantee you that Woodson knows how things were handled by RMK and we have opinion but the internal workings of the program are speculated about but don''t always get openly communicated although in this day of social media there are a lot of so called experts about what goes on behind closed doors.

Old timers know the real story about Woodson, Tommy Baker and Roberson. Two of the three were kicked off the team after the Alaska trip. RMK gave them all chances.
Tommy Baker......fast as hell and could jump through the roof. My buddy and I called him "Passin' Tommy". It was a sad day when he got booted.
 
Like who? I recall threats of guys getting booted, but it seems like he often gave them another chance and I think I recall that at times he took a vote of the team to see if they wanted someone back. That whole Alaska affair that involved Woody, I don't think anyone got booted for and I think he considered it for both Coverdale and Pat Knight, but ultimately kept both. Funderburke left on his own. How did Sherron leave? But, who did he actually boot? I'm sure some of the guys that left, he encouraged them, but I don't recall guys that he actually booted?
Google help from The NY Times.

My memory isn’t a sharp as it used to be, but I was pretty confident Roberson, Baker, and Cox got the boot. Several others indefinitely suspended, including our current leader of men.

The article says Trent Smock got booted at some other time. I’m sure I’d forgotten that one.
 
Last edited:
Immaturity in a senior leader is the ultimate cancer on a team.

I actually do think it is time to cut bait on X. He clearly has his own agenda, and I have to assume that what we see on the court and hear about from his off the court behavior extends all the way down with him. I'd rather see this team do its best finishing out with Cupps, Gallo, and Gunn handling the ball, lean heavily on the posts, and then dive deep for guards in the portal.
 
This has already been discussed ad nauseam. The biggest problem with X's behavior is that he's a 6th year senior and supposed team leader. He should have a different standard applied to him than an 18 year old Freshman who is away from home for the first time in his life.

They're both officially "adults," but we know that both cases aren't the same. The fact that X is doing this stuff at his age is highly problematic. I don't know if it indicates a complete lack of leadership on this team or not, but it is troubling.
 
Last edited:
Tommy Baker......fast as hell and could jump through the roof. My buddy and I called him "Passin' Tommy". It was a sad day when he got booted.
I remember that him and somebody else got in trouble on that Alaskan trip and they got booted. I can't remember who the other person was? Jim Roberson?
 
I remember that him and somebody else got in trouble on that Alaskan trip and they got booted. I can't remember who the other person was? Jim Roberson?
I think one other person that i forgot about was a guy named cox. I also remember that RMK let the team vote on whether Pat got to stay or go. Wilkerson of course. I can vouch that Isiah as a freshman was no choir boy. Momma would not have been happy with him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ekk
In today's culture, seems like most everything is excused if you're delivering...

Personally, I think he's had his second chances (offcourt stuff). I'm more disappointed with CMW in the presser. CMW was terse, defensive and called the incident a "fiasco" How about referencing the action and stating that it was bush league bullshit and we're not going to tolerate it at IU?? CMW had better of had a 1:1 meeting with X today.

Just because you can't use the same tactics as RMK in today's world, you can still have the same values.

I'm honestly done and will not like this team with X at the helm. He's a shitty leader, poor mechanics, made of glass and I'd rather lose 3-5 more games without him than with him in this shitshow of a season.
 
In today's culture, seems like most everything is excused if you're delivering...

Personally, I think he's had his second chances (offcourt stuff). I'm more disappointed with CMW in the presser. CMW was terse, defensive and called the incident a "fiasco" How about referencing the action and stating that it was bush league bullshit and we're not going to tolerate it at IU?? CMW had better of had a 1:1 meeting with X today.

Just because you can't use the same tactics as RMK in today's world, you can still have the same values.

I'm honestly done and will not like this team with X at the helm. He's a shitty leader, poor mechanics, made of glass and I'd rather lose 3-5 more games without him than with him in this shitshow of a season.
Might just be people's perception of words. I didn't watch the presser. But to call something a "fiasco" is pretty damning at least the way I've seen the word used and by its dictionary definition: "a complete failure, esp one that is ignominious or humiliating"
 
Because we’re doing so great with him?
Nope. But it’s similar to the “this team is better without X” crowd. X might not be a great player or leader, but to say this team is better without him is complete nonsense. Did you see what we looked like last night after he was ejected?

Let’s also not act like X is the first player in college basketball to cheap shot someone below the belt. Grayson Allen made a career out of doing shit like this on a basketball court.
 
IMHO, the "C" should have been ripped off of him last night, starts the next game on the bench, and has zero tolerance from this point on. And since I'm being totally honest, if this team had a legitimate replacement for him now, I would have made him fly back home commercial and his locker would have been emptied out.
 
I hate to say it, but this team is so desperate for effective guard play that there will be no repercussions. Woodson understands that the season is on the line (and ultimately, his job) so he is unlikely to drop X or even reduce minutes. Woodson can look at the X Ohio State game and understand that he can’t get that game from anyone else.
I would guess there would be some behind the scenes minor punishment of some sort. But no suspension or reduced minutes.
 
Might just be people's perception of words. I didn't watch the presser. But to call something a "fiasco" is pretty damning at least the way I've seen the word used and by its dictionary definition: "a complete failure, esp one that is ignominious or humiliating"
I guess I interpreted it as a major downplay and individually focused. I wanted him to condemn it as insulting the history of the program, current program and team brand. I never heard him say one thing about it being absolutely unacceptable..just seemed as if it was regarded as an individual gaffe.
 
Last edited:
I hate to say it, but this team is so desperate for effective guard play that there will be no repercussions. Woodson understands that the season is on the line (and ultimately, his job) so he is unlikely to drop X or even reduce minutes. Woodson can look at the X Ohio State game and understand that he can’t get that game from anyone else.
I would guess there would be some behind the scenes minor punishment of some sort. But no suspension or reduced minutes.
I mean if that's where we are, we don't have a program worthy of the name on the shirt. I'd rather we miss the tournament than condone (even tacitly) that sort of conduct by a player.

And I'm not sure that dismissal is appropriate here, but neither is doing nothing.

In hockey if you get ejected from a game you sit the next one as well. That's the minimum that should happen.
 
Nope. But it’s similar to the “this team is better without X” crowd. X might not be a great player or leader, but to say this team is better without him is complete nonsense. Did you see what we looked like last night after he was ejected?

Let’s also not act like X is the first player in college basketball to cheap shot someone below the belt. Grayson Allen made a career out of doing shit like this on a basketball court.
Zeller did it. But he also didnt have the backround X has brought either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: choptalk
X is a head case, always has been. The team comes first. I don't care if you have zero other guards that cannot affect your decision on suspending/dismissing this guy. Woodson is not the guy a lot of people think he is from a coaching standpoint - weak with no discipline.
 
No. If we dismiss him from the team, we may not win another game in the conference.
Dude I hate to break this to you, but however many wins we get in the conference ain't gonna be enough to get us into the Big Dance.

Just ain't happening this year and if getting boat raced by Nebraska and Rutgers didn't show you this, with X on the floor while we were getting our asses kicked (and Johnson was AWFUL for 95% of yesterday's game while he was on the floor) then I'm not sure what to tell you.

This team isn't good and our guards suck. With X or without X, our guards suck.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT