Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, Westeros wasn’t/isn’t a city, but you know that. Nevertheless, the thought of dragons in the solution might have promise . . .From Westeros to San Fransicso to Paris to Johannesburg....large cities all have similar problems across cultures, etc. I tend to think a massive number of humans living in large urban centers generally have the same problems they've always had.
Used to be people just died. Now there are programs which keep them alive and thriving. Do I think Progressive policies are harmful? Probably. Do I also believe that, based upon the entirety of human history, we will continue to look for ways to take care of disadvantaged or just straight trash humans? Yes, we'll continue to do that as well.
So, pray tell, what to the conservative have on offer other than near Darwinism?
Well, when asked how he'd have handled the Iran Hostage Crisis he advised he would have taken a bunch of Shia up in a helicoptor and just started dropping them out until somebody gave up.Your Dad sounds like a really interesting guy.
I think some live that life by choice. Others have mental health. Shitty luck. We should definitely fund support at whatever levels are required imo.Everything is going to be LA? I think still the largest city in the world by actual land area (maybe Berlin or Tokyo or some unknown place in China with 40 million people).
My dad always thought if you dropped homeless people in the woods they'd figure it out. At some point. Many are highly resourceful but just stuck in a doom loop they can't crawl out of.
Of course, the ohter 70% are worthless and won't ever account for much.
. . . .And then you’re presented with the bill. Several trillions?I think some live that life by choice. Others have mental health. Shitty luck. We should definitely fund support at whatever levels are required imo.
It's either that or pitchforks at your door in 20 years.. . . .And then you’re presented with the bill. Several trillions?
Your door maybe. I’ll have Drogon.It's either that or pitchforks at your door in 20 years.
No conspiracies, they’re incompetent and their policies don’t work. It’s simple.I do think there is a very real issue with homelessness and crime in a lot of US cities, but I also think your post wades into far-right conspiracy theory territory. I don't think there is a Democratic platform to keep people dependent on the government. I'm honestly not sure why some of our cities are dealing with these issues, but my guess is that has to do with decades-long neglect of mental health services, affordable housing and yes, cracking down on crime.
I think it's more complicated than Democratic mayors sitting on high watching their cities burn.
Wtf happened to this place? It’s become half Glee half zombie movie. The whole city has become the tenderloin.
Y’all need a Batman
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
This quote?:You can look the quote up but you are too lazy to do that as it proves the exact opposite of what you said.
Who are leading the charge on this?This quote?:
“If we stand passively by while the centre of each city becomes a hive of depravation, crime and hopelessness…if we become two people, the suburban affluent and the urban poor, each filled with mistrust and fear for the other…then we shall effectively cripple each generation to come.”
The road to hell is paved with good intentions and all that.Who are leading the charge on this?
I have a hard time believing when Biden talks about white supremacy or racism he does it with good intentions. From “back in chains,” to “both sides,” to “the threat of white supremacy” Biden shows his intentions are not conciliatory . I think he is deliberately pandering and doesn’t care about unifying the country.The road to hell is paved with good intentions and all that.
But the demonizing of those with good intentions is new and destructive. WE used to call them misguided. Now they are devils or the dreaded "others"? SMDH
Exactly. It’s against the law in every state to appropriate public property for private use. We all know that Amazon cant Use a public park to store its trucks. Yet leftists permit homeless to live in public parks. “Nobody is above the law” only works for some people, but not others.No moron. Enforcing the law. Public safety. Order. Getting the community organizations and businesses on the same page. You used your signature I’m a vapid blinkard laughing emoji above re my post with Rudy but it’s 100 percent accurate as to how he cleaned up nyc. You really need to go away. You are far too stupid to be here. You just muck up threads with your yabbuts
A problem we have today is that this brand of politician, on both sides really, only considers their own interests. So the restaurant owner with the homeless guy posted in front isn’t considered. Or how these policies impact the owner’s viability. And I agree we have to run the homeless off. But they are people too. And we should have a plan for improving their lot.Exactly. It’s against the law in every state to appropriate public property for private use. We all know that Amazon cant Use a public park to store its trucks. Yet leftists permit homeless to live in public parks. “Nobody is above the law” only works for some people, but not others.
Having spent considerable time with nonprofits and social workers who now identify as progressives I agree that they are well intentionedThe road to hell is paved with good intentions and all that.
But the demonizing of those with good intentions is new and destructive. WE used to call them misguided. Now they are devils or the dreaded "others"? SMDH
This quote?:
“If we stand passively by while the centre of each city becomes a hive of depravation, crime and hopelessness…if we become two people, the suburban affluent and the urban poor, each filled with mistrust and fear for the other…then we shall effectively cripple each generation to come.”
We can start the improvement process by stop being enablers. Too many are too tolerant of destructive behavior because changing things involves difficult and seemingly callous standards. A case in point is many cities have decriminalized taking a crap or taking a piss in public because to do otherwise would “criminalize being homeless.”A problem we have today is that this brand of politician, on both sides really, only considers their own interests. So the restaurant owner with the homeless guy posted in front isn’t considered. Or how these policies impact the owner’s viability. And I agree we have to run the homeless off. But they are people too. And we should have a plan for improving their lot.
Well, yeah. His intentions (vis a vis poverty or racism) might be good but he's busy demonizing others. That is a problem. And it doesn't help.I have a hard time believing when Biden talks about white supremacy or racism he does it with good intentions. From “back in chains,” to “both sides,” to “the threat of white supremacy” Biden shows his intentions are not conciliatory . I think he is deliberately pandering and doesn’t care about unifying the country.
Agreed about the NGO’s and government social workers. They do yeoman's work for meager pay. , But can we say the same for those looking for votes?Having spent considerable time with nonprofits and social workers who now identify as progressives I agree that they are well intentioned
America is scared, as soon as any action is taken that can be construed as hard against what is deemed an "underprivileged" person it feels like the end of the world. Talk to police and many that are public servants and they will tell you, the current climate is geared in the wrong direction. I blame the media as a huge component of the problem.We can start the improvement process by stop being enablers. Too many are too tolerant of destructive behavior because changing things involves difficult and seemingly callous standards. A case in point is many cities have decriminalized taking a crap or taking a piss in public because to do otherwise would “criminalize being homeless.”
It’s nothing but politics with Biden. Those kids at Howard didn’t need to hear the garbage Biden spewed at their graduation.I have a hard time believing when Biden talks about white supremacy or racism he does it with good intentions. From “back in chains,” to “both sides,” to “the threat of white supremacy” Biden shows his intentions are not conciliatory . I think he is deliberately pandering and doesn’t care about unifying the country.
None of the homeless want to be helped. That's the problem.One of my dad's recurring quesitons was around military base closures. Surely we could use these massive housing units to house the homeless. And then have drug treatment, job training, mental health services, medical services, etc. Yes, expensive but he really believes you could offer one time amnesty and some voluntary comittal process that would move them to these locations. And we coult finally utilize some level of scale b/c so many people would be housed in one place. Very rudimentary but I'm disappointed we don't even try shit anymore in this country.
Yes, I get that it looks really really shitty. But......sometimes we're constrained by our laws and our options to solve problems get increasingly more confined until there really is nothing we can do. I'm not saying the Dems don't have blood on their hands but I'm not entirely certain we'd see even a 10% change. yeah the crime would go down. You can solve that.
Maybe that's all we can solve in our current model..
Take the ones that do want help. The elderly and young first. Take them from their parents. Sue me. We’re doing society a favor. There are some problems which can only be solved by a frontal assault. Nibbling around the edges does shit.None of the homeless want to be helped. That's the problem.
And they don't want to go to a military base - there's nothing there. They can't be a public nuisance, which is what they want to be. Drugs would be harder to get there.
Enforce the laws we have on the books, for a start. Then, we can go from there.
That's why we need AR-15s.It's either that or pitchforks at your door in 20 years.
Sure, I'm fine for those that want it. I'm afraid the number is much smaller than you think.Take the ones that do want help. The elderly and young first. Take them from their parents. Sue me. We’re doing society a favor. There are some problems which can only be solved by a frontal assault. Nibbling around the edges does shit.
It might cause a constitutional crisis but let’s see how it plays out.
I do wonder what the hell the Colts are going to do if Anthony Richardson wants to keep his college moniker.That's why we need AR-15s.
Was your dad in Vietnam? That's what happened to some of the Viet Cong.Well, when asked how he'd have handled the Iran Hostage Crisis he advised he would have taken a bunch of Shia up in a helicoptor and just started dropping them out until somebody gave up.
So, yeah, interesting. Or loony. He also probably knows more about the Kennedy assassination than any person who hasn't written a book about it (he should have) and probalby many who did (look, I'm not ashamed to admit we traveled to Dallas when I was younger for a conference and I visted the Bethesda Naval Hospital when i was 12 (he still doesn't call it Walter Reed) . But, whatever you do, never ask him about it. Unless you've got at least 12 hours to kill.
Could be. Still think we should find out. And it could be federal.Sure, I'm fine for those that want it. I'm afraid the number is much smaller than you think.
It will work when they're at your door.I do wonder what the hell the Colts are go. A do it Anthony Richardson wants to keep his college moniker.
Quite tonedeafedly “AR-15”. That’s not gonna work.
Yep. Army. I think he went over in ‘67 and came back in ‘68. Medic but never saw the front lines. Mostly in hospital.Was your dad in Vietnam? That's what happened to some of the Viet Cong.
He switched to 5I do wonder what the hell the Colts are going to do if Anthony Richardson wants to keep his college moniker.
Quite tonedeafedly “AR-15”. That’s not gonna work.
And that is complicated by Federal court orders because, as you acknowledge, they are people too and have some pretty basic concerns that are legitimate.And I agree we have to run the homeless off. But they are people too. And we should have a plan for improving their lot.
I'm sure he saw enough. He was probably there for Tet.Yep. Army. I think he went over in ‘67 and came back in ‘68. Medic but never saw the front lines. Mostly in hospital.