Clemson played a great game tonight against a tough team but I'd caution against him being anything other than a flavor of the month coach. In 14 seasons he has taken Clemson (a difficult place to win) to only 4 NCAA tournaments. His in-conference record is barely above .500 (128–126) and he hasn't finished higher than 3rd. His recruiting has also been
This Clemson team played very impressive in the tournament so far but the starting 5 are Fifth year senior, fifth year senior, fifth year senior, senior, and a junior. With an experienced starting 5 (and only three produce double figures though a fourth is at 9.8) you expect a cohesive team. While Clemson itself isn't expected to do it, this is the type of teams that make these once in a blue moon deep runs. This is how most mid majors are attempting to cash in on with their deep conference tournament and NCAA tournament runs, by having a strong team of mature players to play well together.
Let's see how Brownell and the Tigers do next season before saying he should be in the drivers seat for the Hoosiers in '25. I really really think, despite how the Miller and Woodson tenures have gone, that Indiana basketball needs to hire a proven coach from a P5 school. We have the money, we have the prestige, we have the technolo... whoops. Maybe things have changed like with Louisville having to hire the College of Charleston, and maybe my expectations are colored by how college football coaches move around, but I don't see why Indiana can't convince a top tier coach to come to Bloomington.