Edey was 30% of their scoring. He will be missed. I bet Caleb Furst will enter portal soon. Gillis saw the light.
Boiler...
- Thread starter Imsowyctcwuzbetta
- Start date
The thing that is obvious and does not require 37 angles to find is the kick out that the experts and everyone not wearing old urine color glasses picked up on right away. Should have been an offensive foul...game over...TN moves on and prbably doesn't gag in the next game.
Now now...what in the world would EVER make you think that a guy like 03 who shitposts about IU on multiple boards would ever participate in the adult led chants in the bars and street??
No waaaaay
What light did Gillis see? He told Painter he wasn’t coming back, painter filled his scholarship, then he decided to play a 5th year, his 6th year at college.
Furst depends on his studies. Keep pushing your narrative.
If you watch the angle I post, you will see that the "kick out" didn't even make contact. The leg isn't what was hit. It was the hips.
AH, spreading yet another lie about me I see. Either that, or you're delusional.
Reggie was so much better at it than your boy. Back before it was an offensive foul of course.
The "freak" play would have been a non issue if you didn't gag at the FT line.
Heide is a player. Reminds me of Brian Evans. He's got hops and can drain the 3.
When he has his breakout game, will it be known in boiler annals as The Heide Game?
Wow, you must be as old as I am.
I was watching that game - I used to be a big Raiders fan - and when they switched from the game, I ran downstairs to ask my parents if their TV was working OK. lol
I bet my TV at the time couldn't have been more than 9" with bad reception. But, being in 8th grade and having my own TV, I was king of the world.
Last edited:
I didn't see it live. Sporting events I recall came a year or 2 later. As an amateur sports historian, I get the significance of that gane.
I think it gave the AFL some real credibility - before the Jets won the Superbowl - because it was huge news at the time.
The AFL played a great brand of football. Mad Bombers like Daryl Lamonica, Broadway Joe, and the San Diego QB - Dan Fouts. Then the Raiders had the Snake after they got into the NFL. Great time for professional football in the 60s.
I was never a Raiders fan, but they were always the late game and you HAD to watch because somehow, some way something ridiculously crazy was going to happen.
The flop he made was pathetic. It looked like a flop and was made worse by his animation. Perhaps he gets that whistle in Mackey, but not in the NCAA playing for the natty. As we saw with TJD's absence, Lurch plugs a major hole. Purdue will be feisty and competitive as they are well coached and Painter is excellent at building a roster and molding offense scheme to fit his personnel. However, make no mistake, losing Lurch and ALL THE FOULS CALLED that come with him along with the offensive rebounds will have a compounding effect. Guys won't be fouling out / sitting out like the past two seasons. Purdue won't have a huge + advantage in points at the charity stripe. Oh, and they won't have a guy giving them a guaranteed 25 / 10+ night. Oh, and the Purdue guards will be defended. It will be a huge change for them. However, I still expect them to be good and competitive for the reasons already stated.
"Underclassmen," you wrote.
Seriously? Purdue has been chanting that for at least 10 years. You are silly to suggest that they all stop chanting that when they become juniors.
Definitely true. I remember saying out loud before Kline even shot the ball that he missed it. He double clutched.
only really at football games and vs iu anymore. But, both schools seem to think a lot about the other more than we each desire.
In Loyers defense, a ten mph breeze throws him off balance.
Regarding the Edwards supposed kickout debate: I looked at the video. What I found interesting is the reactions of the player upon whom the foul was called and the Tennessee coach. Both were upset about the call. The Tennessee player did not complain that the call was unjust. He was very frustrated that it was made. That is because he knew that he made a mistake. Note also that Barnes was not claiming that Edwards was not fouled, but he was very frustrated that a call was made. The reaction of the other team is usually a good indicator as to whether a foul or bad call was made. A call may be frustrating, but that doesn't make it a bad call.
Of course, the video contradicting theory is likely irrelevant to those who would never give credit to a Purdue success.
Of course, the video contradicting theory is likely irrelevant to those who would never give credit to a Purdue success.
Similar to all the iu fans that paid to join Purdue’s on3 board at one point, but you know, details.
I will just note that in your response to my post that you did not claim that the responses to the call by both the TN player and/or coach were that the call was a bad one. The reason was that they knew the call was fair, unfortunately for them.
Huh? The player was trying to state that he was called for a foul because Edwards kicked his leg out (which isn't why he was called for a foul). I'm sure Barns was showing frustration because the player fouled when he clearly shouldn't have.
At one point? 😂 Most of these are still there in one form or another.
Not at all, I simply chose not to debate a topic with yet another PUkie that has neither the education nor the objectivity to participate meaningfully.
😂 You’re trying to be funny.
If there’s anyone on these internets who has an IU subscription and a Purdue subscription, it’s you. It’s not like you’re stealthy.
Have no IU subscription there and no Pu subscription anywhere.
As a guy that bases his self esteem on IU failures and IU fan’s attention…this is a concept you struggle with I am sure.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
Indiana's 3-point success a 'step forward' in win over South Carolina
- Latest: colinmcmahon31
-
-
-