Dumb.Sentence one: That's on you.
Sentence two: Every team in the f*cking country has bought a team. What do you want him to do find a roster that will play for free?
Dumb.Sentence one: That's on you.
Sentence two: Every team in the f*cking country has bought a team. What do you want him to do find a roster that will play for free?
For #1. You may well be correct. It is indeed how I interpret his comments.Sentence one: That's on you.
Sentence two: Every team in the f*cking country has bought a team. What do you want him to do find a roster that will play for free?
So every disagreement you have is divorce? Change jobs? I suspect it is possible, but I certainly do not have the right to speak for you, that you mean there could be other alternatives. Follow other IU sports for example.Just because CMW doesn't do things, the way you would does not mean it's wrong. If you do not like him it’s always Purdue.
Shut up and cheer!So every disagreement you have is divorce? Change jobs? I suspect it is possible, but I certainly do not have the right to speak for you, that you mean there could be other alternatives. Follow other IU sports for example.