Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, CFN ranked IU 15th fastest at 22.5 s between plays. You have to rack up first downs to make that work. The IU OL clearly didn’t out condition last year’s opponent. Despite the historical occurrence of laughers in the series I think IU covers the spread … the safer bet might be the over.If coach Bell is still determined to run plays super fast - NO don't take the points. If on the other hand he learned from last year and slows things down -Yes take the points. What Bell does is a mystery so bet at your own risk.
If you bet the over, it’s very likely we won’t cover.Yes, CFN ranked IU 15th fastest at 22.5 s between plays. You have to rack up first downs to make that work. The IU OL clearly didn’t out condition last year’s opponent. Despite the historical occurrence of laughers in the series I think IU covers the spread … the safer bet might be the over.
And, OSU will run up the score, if they can, because style point matter.If you bet the over, it’s very likely we won’t cover.
That’s in our hands, not theirs. This is big boy football, and it’s up to us to not allow that to happen.And, OSU will run up the score, it they can because style point matter.
Yes IU’s job is to win the game.That’s in our hands, not theirs. This is big boy football, and it’s up to us to not allow that to happen.
They won’t run up the score if it required showing much of their play book.And, OSU will run up the score, if they can, because style point matter.
They don’t need to. I don’t think they need “style points” If OSU goes undefeated or even loses one game, they won’t be left out of the playoffs because they barely beat Indiana or get In because they blew them out. Nobody cares what you do in week one. Sure they want to look good but getting players pt and checking depth is more important. They won’t risk injury to beat us by 40.They won’t run up the score if it required showing much of their play book.
I don't like the hurry-up. In fact, I think it's ridiculous. We did it last year with the result a lot of three-and-outs. We can't tire out our defense that way. Maybe run an occasional play as hurry-up. It's also a bad look if we do this and don't score. The hurry-up should feature a lot of "explosive plays." And that wasn't the case last season.Yes, CFN ranked IU 15th fastest at 22.5 s between plays. You have to rack up first downs to make that work. The IU OL clearly didn’t out condition last year’s opponent. Despite the historical occurrence of laughers in the series I think IU covers the spread … the safer bet might be the over.
They will be left out depending on who they lose to. If they lose to Michigan they will probably be in(if Michigan wins them all)Lose to Purdue or even Penn state then other things will need to happen. Penn state will probably lose 2 games.They don’t need to. I don’t think they need “style points” If OSU goes undefeated or even loses one game, they won’t be left out of the playoffs because they barely beat Indiana or get In because they blew them out. Nobody cares what you do in week one. Sure they want to look good but getting players pt and checking depth is more important. They won’t risk injury to beat us by 40.
Plus IU is a lot speedier than last year. I hope Lucas can be that all purpose guy. If he gets by the corners and DBs it’s an automatic touchdown. Need to get him in as many miss matches as possible. Love him space.I trust our RBs who say the OL is much better. We will see against OSU if our OL is much better or our DL isn't as good as hoped, I doubt though that either is correct.