ADVERTISEMENT

OT: College softball player getting $1.2 million NIL deal to transfer...

I never thought I would see softball players getting that much out of NIL deals, but a Stanford player transferred to Texas Tech after being offered $1.2 million. She will be getting almost twice as much as the 2nd highest paid head coach in college softball.

Login to view embedded media
A David Collier
@CollieronTV

According a recent
@FOS
article, the highest paid coach in college softball last season was OU's Patty Gasso at $1.625 million and UT's Mike White was second at $625,000.New Texas Tech pitcher NiJaree Canady is reportedly set to make over $1 million next season.

How do transgender women (biological men) live with themselves . . .

when they beat biological women in sports?


When I swam in high school, I didn't make the cut off for the state meet. I easily could have made it for girl's. Who would cheer me for taking off my boy's Speedo and putting on a girl's Speedo and going for the state championship?

Stupid Pre-Season Prediction Post

Whatever - I’m bored.

A reasonable good, not best, case scenario?


8/31 FIU - should win 1-0

9/7 Western Illinois - should win 2-0

9/14 @UCLA - could win - history of talent comparison would say not likely - both teams have a new coach - ours is better - theirs is weird - they have more players back from an 8 win team - their oft-injured back up QB with better numbers now starts - their running game looks solid - passing game good - lost a lot on DL - good size LBs - lost 3 of back 4 - you know what we have sorta 2-1.

9/21 Charlotte - close call could/should win - they have a 2nd year coach who was a HS coach and hedge fund investor hired by Harbaugh at Michigan - went 3-9 in first AAC year, moved up from CUSA - lost 20-38 at Maryland (we lost 44-17) - lost 7-22 at Florida - best win was at Tulsa - hit portal hard - 75 (!) transfers in 2 years - QB from Florida - RB from Michigan - 4 new OL - a “bell weather” game for us, but aren’t they all in a 1st year new regime? 3-1 home win

9/28 Maryland - no more Tagovailoa. But another portal QB spit out by NC State - and they have all been solid to NFL caliber. 2 quality RB’s return 900+ yards. Return 1400 yards among 5 receivers. But … lost 6 OL. Front 7 on defense Adequate+. Back 4 gone. Another game that can tell us where/how we stand. Home game. Can win. Need to win. Home game. Stop the presses! Turtles don’t take us serious - big heads always bite ya - 4-1

10/5 @NW - could win. will be weird. Junior high bleachers on the lakefront. Facts is facts - they won 8 last year after a weird summer and losing Mr. NW. they return 15 starters. Added 6 solid portals, including a decent run threat QB. Fireplug RB. We both played Rutgers, Penn State, Maryland, Wisconsin, Purdue and Illinois last year. We went 1-5. They went 4-2. We played Penn State better. I’d call a couple “even” because of points. Can win. Need to win. Road game. Will we know who we are yet? I “feel” NW had lightning in a bottle last year - which is unreliable. Cig wins road games. Google it. 5-1.

10/19 Nebraska - Rhule. Their 5 wins last year were not impressive to me, and they lost to every “good” team they played, but the Smart Guys think they finally turned it around. 5 star Frosh QB’s are highly loved! A fast 220 pound RB. 8 OL return. Their new DC went to a 3-3-5 to try and keep it in front of them. They improved and bring back a solid bunch. Hard game to win. We are off a bye. Soft beds. Big heads. 5-2.

10/26 Washington - payback is a bitch. They lost everything and we owe them a Penix beating. QB threw for 8,000 in 2 years for Leach. Ponds makes him cry. I still like our chances. 6-2. Cig gets another “first year turnaround patch.

11/2 @MSU - They are a mess. QB Chiles was No. 4 at Oregon State, but played 1 series every game - my plan for assuring a game-ready QB if your top 3 leave. Battling a starter with 9,000 yards at North Dakota. They were awful last year but rallied late to beat us(remember their WR scoring when our guys hit each other?) and Nebraska - both by 3. Road game, but we can win. We have Mo. 7-2.

11/9 Michigan - if they start Tuttle I’ll cry. They return a whopping 7, but they get talent all the time. Home game. If they have completely lost it post-Harbaugh, we need to be REALLY good to win. 7-3.

11/23 @OSU. 7-4.

11/30 Purdue - POTFB. 8-4.

Recent polling

National polls mean next to nothing. Swing state polls are the key, particularly trends.

Recent polls show Harris and Trump tied in two of the three "blue wall" states, and Harris up in Pennsylvania. Two months ago Trump was ahead (in some cases well ahead) of Biden in all three.

Today's NYT/Siena poll has Harris +5 in Arizona and +2 in North Carolina. The last time a Dem presidential candidate took NC was Obama in 2008. Pubs are running a weak and wacky candidate for governor (reminiscent of Mastriano in PA a couple of years ago) in that state and he's down 10 to his Democrat opponent. That's not going to help the Pub ticket there.

Trump leads Harris (in today's NYT/Siena) in Nevada (+1) and Georgia (+4).

Florida is interesting. Trump led Biden in FL by 7 or more. In this week's FAU poll, Trump is up just +3 over Harris. I still think Trump will hold on and carry Florida, but Amendment 4 (the ballot initiative on abortion) is a wild card and could impact candidate voting. If we start seeing the Trump campaign spending time and resources in his home state, he's in huge trouble.

CLOSE THE BORDER NOW YOU STUPID PROGRESSIVES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND DEPORT EVERY ONE OF THEM WHEN YOU WIN TRUMP

Illegal just murdered two chic fil a workers. TWO CHIC FIL A WORKERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! let that sink in lefties. NOTHING is as sacrosanct in this country as chic fil a workers. the only thing that works in this country, and works flawlessly, is chic fil a. the workers are clean. don't smell like weed. run that parking lot line with german precision. Fing with chic fil a should not be a partisan issue. it should be at the very TOP of all that we hold dear and close. I

FIX THE BORDER. NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111

Are you a climate alarmist?

The Green Fraud

By Jim Rickards

Jim Rickards
JIM
RICKARDS
Those yelling the loudest about climate change want to destroy the oil and natural gas industry, destroy nuclear power plant construction, shut down coal-fired plants, end coal mining, mandate electric vehicles (EVs) on very short deadlines and eliminate gas stoves in your kitchen, fireplaces and even outdoor barbecues.

They also want to build wind turbine arrays offshore and on deserts, plains and even mountains near you. They want to install solar module fields on every rooftop and open space near a population center. The climate change radicals want to increase the mining of lithium, nickel, cobalt, copper, rare earths and other dangerous chemicals to feed their obsession with EV batteries.

They’re spending hundreds of billions of tax dollars to subsidize the EVs, battery manufacturing and a coast-to-coast network of charging stations to keep the EVs moving (even if they do have to stop for a charge every 180 miles).

The greenies also want to mandate “15-minute cities” where you can walk everywhere in town within 15 minutes, which means you won’t need your car to visit a doctor, dry cleaner, grocery store, pharmacy or any of the other locations we routinely visit for errands and necessities.

That may sound attractive if you chose it voluntarily. That’s not what the greenies have in mind. They want 15-minute cities as a Trojan horse to eliminate automobiles entirely and force you to ride bicycles or use public transportation. In the end, you’ll need a permit to fly to another city.

The permits will be rationed and you’ll have to put yourself on a waiting list until your turn. You can pay for your ticket with the new central bank digital currency (CBDC), assuming your social credit score is high enough and you didn’t vote for the wrong candidate in the last election.

In short, the climate change agenda is not about climate change. It’s about total political and economic control of the population. So-called climate change is an elite scare tactic to get you to fall into line and obey government orders (as most people do).

Elites claim that if we don’t radically reduce CO2 (carbon dioxide) and CH4 (methane) emissions, global warming will melt the ice caps, raise sea levels, put island nations underwater and flood the New York City subway system in 10 years or less. They’ve been making similar claims for 40 years and they’ve been wrong every time. That doesn’t stop them. Fear works.

What is new is that the climate crowd now has the political power they need to push their agenda using fear and the regulatory state to attack your means of transportation, your personal conveniences and your consumer choices.

This is being enabled by Joe Biden and thousands of bureaucrats buried in the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Department of Energy (DOE), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and scores of other agencies.

The U.S. Treasury, SEC and the Federal Reserve have even joined in by regulating loans to the oil and gas industry and requiring financial disclosures about climate change and other ESG (environment, social and governance) metrics.

Meanwhile, the World Bank (controlled by the U.S.) is being encouraged to deny loans to industries that involve carbon-based development and to steer financing toward projects approved by the climate mavens. This is called the “all of government” approach in which every agency gets involved in pushing the climate agenda, even if it’s not the primary job of that agency. The pressure never stops.

In short, the climate change debate could not be more relevant to investors. Those calling the shots in the Green New Deal (what I call the Green New Scam) will decide which industries win or lose, which projects get financed (or not), which initiatives are subsidized by the government or left to wither on the vine and which companies will feel the regulatory heat if they don’t get with Biden’s programs.

Climate change is not a sideshow. Nothing is more relevant to markets, investors and asset allocators today.

Climate change is real but it’s slow and powerful and has nothing to do with trace gasses such as carbon dioxide and methane. It’s caused by the interaction of complex systems such as sun cycles, ocean currents, wind patterns including the jet stream, volcanic activity, salinity levels (in turn caused by ocean current subduction) and other mega-systems over which humans have no control.

We’re living in a world where major forces beyond our control have been hijacked by elites to create a climate of fear to achieve their agenda of total government command over your life. It’s time for Americans and citizens around the world to learn the facts, push back on the elites and reestablish public policy based on real science. It’s time to push the flawed models, phony data and bogus warnings out of the way.

Unfortunately, the public relies on media elites and political leaders for their information. As decades roll by and scare stories are discredited time and again, public skepticism will rise and the alarmists will lose credibility.

The danger is that alarmists may pass legislation, limit choices and impose costs in the name of climate change before the public catches on to the scam. At that point, the economic damage becomes semi-permanent even if alarmism fades.

In the elites’ vision, citizens will be confined to small towns or cities for extended periods. Travel will be tightly restricted. Appliances will be downsized with no consumer choice allowed. Taxes will be imposed on targeted activities to discourage use. Education will be turned to indoctrination to raise a generation who believe in the climate lies needed to gain support for these measures (that kind of indoctrination has been underway for some years).

Welcome to the world of the green elite. It’s coercive, restrictive, arrogant and apparently not much fun. It’s a world where the elites control everything and you do as you’re told. It’s a world based on lies and fear. It’s coming sooner than you expect unless citizens can join hands, reassert the truth and push the elites back into a corner where they belong.

Regards,

Jim Rickards

Border getting better!!!...

So in August, the CPB reported ONLY 208,887 illegals crossed the border, a DECREASE from July.


I always knew that once our border czar, VP Harris, visited, we would see tremendous improvement.

Yes, there have been over 1M since the election, but Biden has them well taken care for.


WAY TO GO JOE!!!

George Orwell's March, 1940 Review of the English translation of Mein Kamph

Before a sizable bunch of people get their knickers in a bunch, I re-read this very short review, and was awestruck again (like for much of Orwell's work), as to how Orwell is able to deftly distill the makings of a man. In re-readings this, there is much to take from Orwell as he desribes groups of people that are hard to argue with, but also, you could substitute Trump for Hitler in terms of how that person perceives himself, without any trouble. Lest anyone get all out of whack, Orwell isn't referring to the killing of Jews, slaughter of gypsies and slavs, but rather the person. Below is Orwell's take:

“It is a sign of the speed at which events are moving that Hurst and Blackett’s unexpurgated edition of Mein Kampf, published only a year ago, is edited from a pro-Hitler angle. The obvious intention of the translator’s preface and notes is to tone down the book’s ferocity and present Hitler in as kindly a light as possible. For at that date Hitler was still respectable. He had crushed the German labour movement, and for that the property-owning classes were willing to forgive him almost anything. Both Left and Right concurred in the very shallow notion that National Socialism was merely a version of Conservatism.

Then suddenly it turned out that Hitler was not respectable after all. As one result of this, Hurst and Blackett’s edition was reissued in a new jacket explaining that all profits would be devoted to the Red Cross. Nevertheless, simply on the internal evidence of Mein Kampf, it is difficult to believe that any real change has taken place in Hitler’s aims and opinions. When one compares his utterances of a year or so ago with those made fifteen years earlier, a thing that strikes one is the rigidity of his mind, the way in which his world-view doesn’t develop. It is the fixed vision of a monomaniac and not likely to be much affected by the temporary manoeuvres of power politics. Probably, in Hitler’s own mind, the Russo-German Pact represents no more than an alteration of time-table. The plan laid down in Mein Kampf was to smash Russia first, with the implied intention of smashing England afterwards. Now, as it has turned out, England has got to be dealt with first, because Russia was the more easily bribed of the two. But Russia’s turn will come when England is out of the picture—that, no doubt, is how Hitler sees it. Whether it will turn out that way is of course a different question.

Suppose that Hitler’s programme could be put into effect. What he envisages, a hundred years hence, is a continuous state of 250 million Germans with plenty of ‘living room’ (i.e. stretching to Afghanistan or thereabouts), a horrible brainless empire in which, essentially, nothing ever happens except the training of young men for war and the endless breeding of fresh cannon-fodder. How was it that he was able to put this monstrous vision across? It is easy to say that at one stage of his career he was financed by the heavy industrialists, who saw in him the man who would smash the Socialists and Communists. They would not have backed him, however, if he had not talked a great movement into existence already. Again, the situation in Germany, with its seven million unemployed, was obviously favourable for demagogues. But Hitler could not have succeeded against his many rivals if it had not been for the attraction of his own personality, which one can feel even in the clumsy writing of Mein Kampf, and which is no doubt overwhelming when one hears his speeches … The fact is that there is something deeply appealing about him. One feels it again when one sees his photographs—and I recommend especially the photograph at the beginning of Hurst and Blackett’s edition, which shows Hitler in his early Brownshirt days. It is a pathetic, dog-like face, the face of a man suffering under intolerable wrongs. In a rather more manly way it reproduces the expression of innumerable pictures of Christ crucified, and there is little doubt that that is how Hitler sees himself. The initial, personal cause of his grievance against the universe can only be guessed at; but at any rate the grievance is here. He is the martyr, the victim, Prometheus chained to the rock, the self-sacrificing hero who fights single-handed against impossible odds. If he were killing a mouse he would know how to make it seem like a dragon. One feels, as with Napoleon, that he is fighting against destiny, that he can’t win, and yet that he somehow deserves to. The attraction of such a pose is of course enormous; half the films that one sees turn upon some such theme.

Also he has grasped the falsity of the hedonistic attitude to life. Nearly all western thought since the last war, certainly all ‘progressive’ thought, has assumed tacitly that human beings desire nothing beyond ease, security and avoidance of pain. In such a view of life there is no room, for instance, for patriotism and the military virtues. The Socialist who finds his children playing with soldiers is usually upset, but he is never able to think of a substitute for the tin soldiers; tin pacifists somehow won’t do. Hitler, because in his own joyless mind he feels it with exceptional strength, knows that human beings don’tonly want comfort, safety, short working-hours, hygiene, birth-control and, in general, common sense; they also, at least intermittently, want struggle and self-sacrifice, not to mention drums, flags and loyalty-parades. However they may be as economic theories, Fascism and Nazism are psychologically far sounder than any hedonistic conception of life. The same is probably true of Stalin’s militarised version of Socialism. All three of the great dictators have enhanced their power by imposing intolerable burdens on their peoples. Whereas Socialism, and even capitalism in a more grudging way, have said to people ‘I offer you a good time,’ Hitler has said to them ‘I offer you struggle, danger and death,’ and as a result a whole nation flings itself at his feet. Perhaps later on they will get sick of it and change their minds, as at the end of the last war. After a few years of slaughter and starvation ‘Greatest happiness of the greatest number’ is a good slogan, but at this moment ‘Better an end with horror than a horror without end’ is a winner. Now that we are fighting against the man who coined it, we ought not to underrate its emotional appeal.”
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT