first off, let's get straight what this really is and isn't about.
what is the real end objective, and what is just the means to that end.
regardless of what one thinks about UCLA and USC, getting UCLA and USC to the B10, and their tv market, is not the end goal. it's a means to that end goal.
is there money there, maybe, probably, but we're talking chump change vs the real pot of gold.
the real end goal is eliminating the PAC as a negotiating competitor for tv money.
for those around since the SEC grabbed Mizzou and A&M, the B10 Neb, then UMd and RU, the PAC taking Colorado and going after Texas and OU hard at the time, the goal then wasn't those schools or "expansion", it was always about trying to take out the B12 and ACC as competitors for tv money.
i said so all day every day at the time, and have so since.
taking out the B12 is what the SEC taking Texas and OU was about. OU and Texas were just the means to that end goal.
the term "EXPANSION" was always just corporate spin.
this was always industry CONSOLIDATION. that is where the real money is.
negotiating with Fox and Disney/ESPN/ABC and Comcast/NBC and CBS and Apple and Amazon and Google as close to a pure monopoly/monopsony seller as possible, like the NFL does thanks to their anti trust exemption..
and duopolies generally "cooperate" to do business as a monopoly.
as to Oregon or Washington in the PAC, or UNC, Clemson, Miami, FSU, and all others, who will and won't be targets of the B10 and SEC, remember, this isn't mostly about if those schools would or wouldn't be good additions.
it will be who and how many it takes to achieve the real end goal.
taking out the PAC will be done taking as few schools as it takes to get the job done.
same with taking out the ACC.
CORPORATE CONSOLIDATION is about concentrating money and power in as few hands as possible.
it's not personal. it's just business.
and if/once the powers that be can get it down to a duopoly operating as a monopoly, at that point the duopoly can turn it's attention to consolidation within their ranks, as capitalism never sleeps, and never is content to stand pat.
what the powers will be content with tomorrow, is not what they will be content with the day after tomorrow.
the algorithm doesn't work that way. it has no off switch.
as for any at IU who may not like what i'm saying here.
"and when they came for me".