ADVERTISEMENT

OT: Indiana State...

With their head coach Mitch Hannahs taking the South Florida job, it will be interesting to see who takes over that job and what staff members will follow Hannahs to Tampa, if any. How all of this affects their roster remains to be seen, and they say they have initiated a nationwide search for a new coach. South Florida came in 9th in the 10-team AAC this past season and they had their third straight losing season. Luke Hayden will be drafted so he will probably move on after having a great season with the Sycamores this past season.
  • Like
Reactions: Bucket Getter

The Father of Our Country

The Father's Day party on our porch has begun a day early.

Asked a recently confirmed American citizen from Thailand who the father of our country was.

She replied, "George Washington".

She then said to ask her native born husband this question when he arrived.

Upon his arrival and being asked he replied, "Jimmy Rodgers".

Hearing this, his Thai bride doubled over laughing.

To wit he declared, "I've been to the Country Hall of Fame, and I know who the Father of Country is".

The Thai bride looked puzzled and frowned as if she was about to lose her citizenship.

OT: OSU's Bill Mosiello is moving on after just two seasons with the Buckeyes...

Mosiello is headed back to TCU as the top assistant and hitting coach. Before the OSU job, he was the associate head coach at TCU for nine seasons. He said the move was strictly for family reasons, and his family remained in Texas the two years he was with OSU. Mosiello was considered one of the top hires in the country at the time OSU signed him. Evidently, he never informed the team of his decision nor did he tell incoming athletic director Ross Bjork of his decision before he announced it. Here's a quote on that from an article:

Mosiello said he didn't have time to tell Ohio State players before the move was finalized. He also said he did not speak with incoming athletic director Ross Bjork about his vision for the Ohio State baseball program because "I didn't want him to talk me out of leaving."

"Me chasing my ambition here at my dream job to be away from my family, I wanted it so bad and make it work," Mosiello said. "It just couldn't happen. It couldn't happen. It's really that simple."

Login to view embedded media

Revenue Share Details Emerging

For those interested, more details are coming out on how the rev share will probably work.

Per some people involved with and around IU NIL, of the $20-22M rev share likely to start in 2025-26, half would go to men’s sports, so $10-11M, and the B1G is going to mandate about 75% of that go to football, so $7.5-8M is the current estimate for rev share to football.

This is interesting because it indicates Title IX seems likely to split the rev share 50/50, and the conference will mandate the percentage amount for football (probably want the product good for TV) vs schools/ADs having discretion on how much to allocate to football.

The 50/50 mens/women’s rev share split could go away if conferences/schools argue sports aren’t part of the educational experience, and thus not subject to Title IX. I have no idea if that could happen.

I continue to think this rev share cap could be a positive for IU. Say IU has $4M NIL now and another school has $8M NIL — IU has 50% less. Add $8M rev share cap for both schools and now IU has $12M and the other school has $16M — IU only has 25% less $ available for players, and that is a better position to be in. Who knows how it actually plays out, this is just a guess/example.

Of course the other advantage for IU is it appears TV $ increases can fund the rev share for us. Some schools outside the core B1G and SEC will struggle to fund it, which may compromise their NIL, rev share, and other sports.

It would be interesting to know if schools are quoting 2025 targets with compensation numbers that include the rev share. I would think so.

Others may know more and things could change.

  • Locked
Letter from FIRED teacher at Episcopal School of Baton Rouge.

Why has Sara Fenske been the bottleneck to Episcopal’s Academic Competitiveness?

Author: Xiaoyue Jiang, Upper School Teacher of Physics and Engineering
Submitted to:
1. Upper School Faculty Representatives: Clara Howell, Katie Sutcliffe, James Moroney
2. Head of School: Dr. Carrie Steakley

Purpose: Request a thorough investigation on Sara Fenske’s DEI violation, abuse of power, and academic incompetence leading to bottlenecking Episcopal’s academic competitiveness, and non-renewal of Xiaoyue Jiang’s 2024-2025 employment contract.

Section 1. Why this document and why now?
Why? Ever since Episcopal posted the upper school physics position online in early February I received numerous inquiries and kind words from students, parents, and fellow staff and faculty members. While differing in the awareness of the actual situation, most of them assumed that I chose to leave as soon as Ivy graduates; without exception, they all feel upset about my leaving, wishing I may at least stay for X more year(s) and wishing me all the best for my retirement or whatever post-Episcopal plan I may have in mind. For a few that actually knew what was going on, they complained that the school was not doing the right thing. I have to correct them. It is not the school but a specific individual that does not represent the school. Instead, she severely damages the spirit of the Episcopal community and has become the bottleneck of Episcopal academic excellence—this document is to prove this point with evidence and reasoning.
Of course, everyone on this campus knows whom I am talking about—Dr. Sara Fenske.
Why Now? FEAR has held me back from being “honest and open” to my beloved Episcopal community until now. The feeling of abandonment from students (in particular, after Ivy’s Caltech admissions became publicized) broke my heart each time, and I do not blame my students if they think of me as a selfish hypocrite. I wish I could be braver than this. Now I am ready to speak up, not for myself for my own sake, but for me as a member of this community--teacher, parent, a person of foreign accent, and a nice person who never wants to fight or even compete, unless he has to, for a cause larger than himself.

My Remembrance....

Arrived in-country with Infantry MOS February 4th, 1969..dry season.

Assigned to 11ACR, got to field around Feb 15th.

On Feb 28th. Our Troop Commander was shot and killed while directing an attack on a bunker complex.
Thomas McAdams, 27, Liberty Texas.

On August 12, three more died after a convoy was ambushed.
Marcello Barrios, 25, Artesia Calif
Chris Webster, 21, Great Falls, Mt
Larry Wheeler, 21, Tangent, Or

On December 2, two more..
Robert Curl. 24, Walled Lake, MI
Robert Raines 24, Greenwood, IN

On December 15th, five more...
Ronald Collins 18, Flora IN
Farrish Combs, 19, Chicago
James P. Nugent 18, Jersey City
Daniel Dawson, 23 Hookstown,
PA
John Roche, 23 Los Angeles
The last five died in a huge battle including another Cav troop, ARVN infantry, tac air, organic gunship support...everything...

John Roche was a young 2Lt, who had been in country 43 days. Nugent was in country 26 days. Collins 51 days.

I knew them all. I still see their faces. Collins was shot through the throat and bled to death.
Roche was a Notre Dame graduate..

My mother called Raines mother after his death..

All sacrificed at the altar of War.

For nothing......nothing...

Wherein we discuss the aliens among us.


Aliens might be living among us, according to a study by Harvard academics.

A new paper suggests extraterrestrials could also be living underground or in a base inside the Moon.

The study by Harvard University’s Human Flourishing program further puts forward the idea that UFOs, or unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), may be spaceships visiting their Earth-based alien friends.

The researchers have investigated so-called ‘cryptoterrestrials’.

These could be disguising themselves as humans to fit in, may have come from Earth’s future or might have descended from intelligent dinosaurs.

The study was created to offer an alternate “unconventional” explanation for UAP sightings and to hypothesize what they might mean, and “the possibility that UAP may involve forms of non-human intelligence (NHI) that are already present in Earth’s environment in some sense” that exist “alongside us in distinct stealth”.

The paper reads: “The author became increasingly aware of the depth of evidence and theory that also tentatively supports another ultraterrestrial explanation: the “cryptoterrestrial” hypothesis (CTH) – our focus here – which holds that UAP may reflect activities of NHIs concealed here on Earth (e.g., underground) and its environs.”

Four theories on aliens living near humans are investigated.

The first are human cryptoterrestrials: A technologically advanced ancient human civilisation that was largely destroyed long ago (e.g. by flood), but continued to exist in remnant form.

The second are hominid or theropod cryptoterrestrials: A technologically advanced non-human civilisation consisting of some terrestrial animal which evolved to live in stealth (e.g., underground). The paper suggests these could be an ape-like hominid descendant, or descendants of “unknown, intelligent dinosaurs”.

The third cryptoterrestrials are former extraterrestrial or extratempestrial cryptoterrestrials. These would have arrived on Earth from elsewhere in the cosmos or from the human future, respectively, and concealed themselves in stealth, such as in the Moon.

Theory four, dubbed CTH 4, are “magical Cryptoterrestrials”: Entities which are less like homegrown aliens and more like “earthbound angels”.

The paper says these relate to the world inhabited by humans in ways that are less technological than magical, giving the examples of “fairies, elves, nymphs”.

The academics do conclude that their theories, especially the elves suggestion, might be hard to take by many people.

They add: “The principal weakness of CTH 4, by contrast, is its utter strangeness, particularly for readers schooled to limit themselves to modes of explanation within the bounds of, say, the standard model of physics.

“While belief in extraterrestrials is tenable, belief in (something like) fairies is simply not a live option for many scientists.”

This would explain the Kardashians, people who like Vamderpump rules, and at least one of my ex girlfriends.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT