The records case is legit because aTrump is charged under a statute that directly pertains to the way he handled the records.The records case is the most important to me because I care very much about protecting national security information and that wasn't it. I think the second federal case is next important and legit. There is no doubt Trump explored every possible avenue to overturn the results of a legitimate election (the Democratically expressed will of the people) and that should never be allowed to happen again. Seems to me extremely illegal. The indictments for both of those are good reads.
Don't care so much about the state cases. Though I do think it's likely that Trump will be found guilty of some of the charges in one or both of those. Clearly the investigations and the prosecutions were at least started for political reasons. That doesn't mean the ultimate prosecution is entirely illegitimate but can't deny the political aspect. I think the claim that the federal investigation and pending prosecutions is political is ridiculous.
I don't think we should allow Presidents or former Presidents to get a pass on criminal behavior. They were preparing to indict Nixon after he resigned. Ford was aware and pardoned him. Which, I've gone back and forth on whether that was the right thing to do. I think Clinton probably should have been prosecuted for his perjury, but he lost his license to practice law instead. Obviously, that was nothing more than a slap on the wrist since he was never going to practice law again anyway.
All other cases are garbage. Challenging a legitimate election must never be criminalized, and it isn’t. To do so will put us in Putin’s camp. Trump is charged under a different statutes that have nothing to do with challenging an election. The statutes are abused by the government to get Trump.
I posted about all of this months ago.