If they remember me, 35 years from now and press a complaint, it will probably for being a pencil dick.
I swear you are ken jeong.
I know, how racist of me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If they remember me, 35 years from now and press a complaint, it will probably for being a pencil dick.
It's received some polarized reviews from Civ fans, but I like it. I skipped 5 altogether, but I definitely think 6 is an improvement over 4 in many ways.OK that’s actually a respectable choice. Have not played 6 but I have played some of the earlier versions
I swear you are ken jeong.
I know, how racist of me.
Don’t faint, but if that’s all it is, that’s definitely stupid.A source who said they were briefed on the contents of the letter said it described an incident involving Kavanaugh and a woman that took place when both were 17 years old and at a party. According to the source, Kavanaugh and a male friend had locked her in a room against her will, making her feel threatened, but she was able to get out of the room. The Guardian has not verified the apparent claims in the letter. It is not yet clear who wrote it.https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/sep/13/brett-kavanaugh-dianne-feinstein-confidential-letter
If this is all this is about, then what a damn waste of time. Seriously, I think Kavanaugh was a teenager in the 1980's, this is the type of thing that would be seen as a prank when I was a teenager in the 90's. If all they did was lock a girl in a room at a party (which you would think would mean even more people there) by herself, then Kavanaugh committed the egregious sin of being a 17 year old boy who did not think things through.
And Mitch warned him that Kavanaugh could be one of the hardest judges on the list to get through. But for some reason, Trump picked him anyway.
I bet he's saving Barrett to replace Ginsberg-if she leaves the Court during his term.Agreed. I would have preferred Barrett.
If that is all it is Feinstein should be censured.A source who said they were briefed on the contents of the letter said it described an incident involving Kavanaugh and a woman that took place when both were 17 years old and at a party. According to the source, Kavanaugh and a male friend had locked her in a room against her will, making her feel threatened, but she was able to get out of the room. The Guardian has not verified the apparent claims in the letter. It is not yet clear who wrote it.https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/sep/13/brett-kavanaugh-dianne-feinstein-confidential-letter
If this is all this is about, then what a damn waste of time. Seriously, I think Kavanaugh was a teenager in the 1980's, this is the type of thing that would be seen as a prank when I was a teenager in the 90's. If all they did was lock a girl in a room at a party (which you would think would mean even more people there) by herself, then Kavanaugh committed the egregious sin of being a 17 year old boy who did not think things through.
Lol For what, sending the FBI some info?If that is all it is Feinstein should be censured.
Those are consensual relationships and certainly not of any violent nature.
Big diff.
https://downtrend.com/71superb/dian...vanaugh-letter-turns-out-to-be-a-serious-dud/
This is such stupid sh!t. I actually thought Feinstein had some sense. It appears she’s let the looney left cause her to do this stupid sh!t.
It was the right thing to hand it to the FBI but if that's was what it all about then, it's petty.
My link is only part of the Ginsburg interview. I am not sure but I think it was this interview I watched in its entirety. She said her White House handlers peppered her with questions about her 12 years with the ACLU. They were worried some cases would be a real problem. She said she didn’t get one question about her ACLU days. She was confirmed 96-3.
I'd say I'm surprised to see such adamant opinions based on vague and fragmentary news reports, but I'm not.
She is right.
I think the problem goes back to what Benjamin Sasse said last week. These Supreme Court decisions have become so politicized because Congress has abdicated their responsibility in governing this country. They go the easy route and let these issues fester until the Court has to take them up. And why? Because taking a stand one way or the other could be detrimental to their ability to get reelected. And that is what is most important to most members of Congress.
So we have taken a body that was supposed to he apolitical and forced it to be political because the House and Senate are so dysfunctional.
https://downtrend.com/71superb/dian...vanaugh-letter-turns-out-to-be-a-serious-dud/
This is such stupid sh!t. I actually thought Feinstein had some sense. It appears she’s let the looney left cause her to do this stupid sh!t.
Everyone said “if.” That being said, it’s hard to imagine many things that a person does as a minor that would be very relevant to confirming a 50+ year old to a judicial position. It’s also not hard to remember something embarrassing (or several such things) that we did as minors, but aren’t very relevant to who we are now. When I said the next step in the increasing partisanship surrounding confirmation proceedings would be looking into everything a nominee has done, said or written from kindergarten on, I was kidding, but maybe I was right.I'd say I'm surprised to see such adamant opinions based on vague and fragmentary news reports, but I'm not.
IF that’s all it is, why was it the right thing to do? IF that’s all it is, I can imagine people at the FBI breaking into uncontrollable laughter and then wondering why Feinstein is wasting their time. IF that’s all it is, they don’t even have a crime to investigate.It was the right thing to hand it to the FBI but if that's was what it all about then, it's petty.
She is right.
I think the problem goes back to what Benjamin Sasse said last week. These Supreme Court decisions have become so politicized because Congress has abdicated their responsibility in governing this country. They go the easy route and let these issues fester until the Court has to take them up. And why? Because taking a stand one way or the other could be detrimental to their ability to get reelected. And that is what is most important to most members of Congress.
So we have taken a body that was supposed to he apolitical and forced it to be political because the House and Senate are so dysfunctional.
It was the right thing to hand it to the FBI but if that's was what it all about then, it's petty.
What is Asian sex?Sglow needs to stop bragging about his weird, Asian, hooker sex with minors.
BS. The FBI has enough to do without investigating 35-year-old high school juvie cases. Especially when the alleged victim reveals in the midst of a political firestorm. This is a local law enforcement deal. The Democrats have managed to make politics more disgusting than Trump ever could. RBG is correct. Feinstein indeed should be censured.
And I assume you were all up in arms when the Garland nomination was never brought up to the Senate?
No. I didn't think so.
Save me your false outrage, please CoH. You are better than that or at least I hope so. Otherwise its just disappointing.
Here’s where I’m at. The new normal for SCOTUS nominations stinks, but was exactly as expected. What did anyone think the result would be after Garland? The rules were changed and now we have a different game entirely.
Lol. Oh are we still censuring? Cause that’s def the worst thing that’s happened in the last two years.If that is all it is Feinstein should be censured.A source who said they were briefed on the contents of the letter said it described an incident involving Kavanaugh and a woman that took place when both were 17 years old and at a party. According to the source, Kavanaugh and a male friend had locked her in a room against her will, making her feel threatened, but she was able to get out of the room. The Guardian has not verified the apparent claims in the letter. It is not yet clear who wrote it.https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/sep/13/brett-kavanaugh-dianne-feinstein-confidential-letter
If this is all this is about, then what a damn waste of time. Seriously, I think Kavanaugh was a teenager in the 1980's, this is the type of thing that would be seen as a prank when I was a teenager in the 90's. If all they did was lock a girl in a room at a party (which you would think would mean even more people there) by herself, then Kavanaugh committed the egregious sin of being a 17 year old boy who did not think things through.
And I assume you were all up in arms when the Garland nomination was never brought up to the Senate?
No. I didn't think so.
Spare me your fake outrage, please CoH. You are better than that or at least I hope so. Otherwise its just disappointing.
It changed with Bork. Let’s get the timeline right and who started it. And don’t forget Biden’s little speech.
Edit: And high tech lynching of Thomas.
Here’s where I’m at. The new normal for SCOTUS nominations stinks, but was exactly as expected. What did anyone think the result would be after Garland? The rules were changed and now we have a different game entirely.
You are familiar with Bork’s past right? Give the Biden remark a rest. When you can name the SCOTUS nominee that Democrats refused to schedule for hearing, I’ll apologize to you.
The FBI is responsible for performing the background check, and that's my understanding as to why the FBI was informed. I'm of the opinion that allegations of rape, regardless of when it occurred and if indeed that is the allegation, should be brought to the attention of those performing the background check. You're free to disagree, of course.BS. The FBI has enough to do without investigating 35-year-old high school juvie cases. Especially when the alleged victim reveals in the midst of a political firestorm. This is a local law enforcement deal. The Democrats have managed to make politics more disgusting than Trump ever could. RBG is correct. Feinstein indeed should be censured.
Who is Ken Jeong?I swear you are ken jeong.
I know, how racist of me.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news...ugh-stirs-tension-among-democrats-in-congress
Ronan Farrow got the actual details
When it rapes like a rapist...https://www.newyorker.com/news/news...ugh-stirs-tension-among-democrats-in-congress
Ronan Farrow got the actual details
When it rapes like a rapist...