The left has jumped the shark.
Was going to vote straight ticket Dem on a Trump protest vote.
Reconsidering now.
Was going to vote straight ticket Dem on a Trump protest vote.
Reconsidering now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The one positive thing about DJT being President is that this drunk woman isn't.
Seriously....WTF?
https://reason.com/blog/2018/09/12/clinton-pushes-fake-news-about-kavanaugh
Why can't our nation find non-mentally deranged people to run for POTUS? Is that too much to ask?
(FWIW she'd be better than the current clown by a mile....but she's still doesn't make the long bus).
The left has jumped the shark.
Was going to vote straight ticket Dem on a Trump protest vote.
Reconsidering now.
The one positive thing about DJT being President is that this drunk woman isn't.
Seriously....WTF?
https://reason.com/blog/2018/09/12/clinton-pushes-fake-news-about-kavanaugh
Why can't our nation find non-mentally deranged people to run for POTUS? Is that too much to ask?
(FWIW she'd be better than the current clown by a mile....but she's still doesn't make the long bus).
The real problem going forward is jobs and our economy. Neither party has a solution because if they did, that's all they'd talk about and they'd win in a landslide and fix the problem. The House Pubs are now planning to put forth a campaign tax-cut legislation that would add $2T to the debt. They know it won't pass the Senate but they hope it will get them votes. That's after creating an almost $1T deficit for this year and $1T deficit for upcoming years. The Trump Machine is ruining our environment and sabotaging the EPA and as much science in the Government as they can. They're not really doing anything useful. They acclaimed by conservatives for their SC appointees but big deal, what does that really do for the country? All it does it score them points in the disingenuous political tit-for-tat game of who-cares-if-we-ruin-the-country?The left has jumped the shark.
Was going to vote straight ticket Dem on a Trump protest vote.
Reconsidering now.
WTF are you bitching about?The left has jumped the shark.
Was going to vote straight ticket Dem on a Trump protest vote.
Reconsidering now.
In this day and age of outright lying and selling it to the entire country, taking something out of context barely seems a blip on the radar. I’m mainly concerned about him eventually ruling on Trump . Also interested in the alleged perjury charges, but haven’t investigated those enough to know of there is any validity.The left has jumped the shark.
Was going to vote straight ticket Dem on a Trump protest vote.
Reconsidering now.
Hillary is touting the myth that Kavanaugh calls birth control “abortion pills”.WTF are you bitching about?
Srsly. I was playing a video game. What happened?
WTF are you bitching about?
Srsly. I was playing a video game. What happened?
WTF are you bitching about?
Srsly. I was playing a video game. What happened?
The real problem going forward is jobs and our economy. Neither party has a solution because if they did, that's all they'd talk about and they'd win in a landslide and fix the problem. The House Pubs are now planning to put forth a campaign tax-cut legislation that would add $2T to the debt. They know it won't pass the Senate but they hope it will get them votes. That's after creating an almost $1T deficit for this year and $1T deficit for upcoming years. The Trump Machine is ruining our environment and sabotaging the EPA and as much science in the Government as they can. They're not really doing anything useful. They acclaimed by conservatives for their SC appointees but big deal, what does that really do for the country? All it does it score them points in the disingenuous political tit-for-tat game of who-cares-if-we-ruin-the-country?
In short, vote for anyone you can find who actually cares about the future of this country.
I think the real problems are the long term deficit and entitlement problems. The economy and jobs are actually getting a temporary boost thanks to tax cuts and regulation cuts, but the long term forecast looks troubling.
Of course. The deficit and debt are the problems that tax revenue from the economy and jobs need to fix. The debt and deficit can't be wished away. The stimulus from the tax cuts is limited in comparison to the ballooning deficit. We'll know the problem is getting solved when tax revenues outpace the government expenditures. The solution has to be a modern economy with modern jobs. That's what Hillary told West Virginians. Trump told them he'd bring back jobs from the 50s. They voted for the past rather than the future. The question is, do Democrats actually know how to create modern jobs? I see no indication they do but if they do, they've got a serious messaging problem. I know for certain Republicans are clueless on modern jobs.I think the real problems are the long term deficit and entitlement problems. The economy and jobs are actually getting a temporary boost thanks to tax cuts and regulation cuts, but the long term forecast looks troubling.
You may be right on the expense side. However the tax cut created a significant revenue problem.
Of course. The deficit and debt are the problems that tax revenue from the economy and jobs need to fix. The debt and deficit can't be wished away. The stimulus from the tax cuts is limited in comparison to the ballooning deficit. We'll know the problem is getting solved when tax revenues outpace the government expenditures. The solution has to be a modern economy with modern jobs. That's what Hillary told West Virginians. Trump told them he'd bring back jobs from the 50s. They voted for the past rather than the future. The question is, do Democrats actually know how to create modern jobs? I see no indication they do but if they do, they've got a serious messaging problem. I know for certain Republicans are clueless on modern jobs.
I think the real problems are the long term deficit and entitlement problems. The economy and jobs are actually getting a temporary boost thanks to tax cuts and regulation cuts, but the long term forecast looks troubling.
Is it a revenue problem or income statement problem? Stupid fiscal policy decided to give tax cuts while dramatically increasing spending. I'd call it a mismanagement problem.
There was no perjury. The Democrats need to brace for the inevitable confirmation - with a few Democratic yes votes as well.I think Kavanaugh may have perjured himself multiple times in the Senate so that's plenty to disqualify him from the court.
The "plan B" pill being birth control/abortion is a common point of disagreement between pro-choice/pro-life folks. I don't think the description by either group is accurate.
This speaks to the issues hoot. It is unequivocal that the tax cuts were stimulative:
But, our fiscal decisions caused an increase in projected deficits, a stupid decision at this point of the economic cycle.
Sorry if I don’t just take your word as gospel. I’ve assumed all along he would get confirmed. And then Trump will have every wing of government supporting , aiding and abetting his corrupt administration. History will not look kindly on the Trump era and the spineless ones that went along with it.There was no perjury. The Democrats need to brace for the inevitable confirmation - with a few Democratic yes votes as well.I think Kavanaugh may have perjured himself multiple times in the Senate so that's plenty to disqualify him from the court.
The "plan B" pill being birth control/abortion is a common point of disagreement between pro-choice/pro-life folks. I don't think the description by either group is accurate.
I’m asking this because I don’t know the answer. Are the long run capital stocks where we see the share buybacks? Share buybacks will total about $1t in 2018, up about 80% over 2017. However the small m market has been flat. Where do those transactions show?
You need to separate this from the Trump administration. Kavanaugh could be the nominee of any Republican President. This issue isn’t about Trump.Sorry if I don’t just take your word as gospel. I’ve assumed all along he would get confirmed. And then Trump will have every wing of government supporting , aiding and abetting his corrupt administration. History will not look kindly on the Trump era and the spineless ones that went along with it.
Maybe your "owners" aren't part of the solution. I'm defining modern jobs as jobs that fit the modern situation. Society needs to adapt to automation and the global economy and create jobs to employ people and boost our economy to cover our debt, whether current "owners" help or hinder. The next politician who solves this riddle will be the first.Modern jobs require training and brain power rather than muscle power. Unfortunately for workers, owners can invest in technology which has artificial brain power along with being able to perform repetitive tasks at far less cost over the long pull than humans.
Over time even Chinese and Mexican workers will become too expensive as is already the case in the US.
.
And under a normal situation it wouldn’t be about the person that nominated him. But under a normal situation, that judge wouldn’t likely be ruling on the President ‘s breaking the law or not either. That’s a pretty big difference.You need to separate this from the Trump administration. Kavanaugh could be the nominee of any Republican President. This issue isn’t about Trump.
Anyone else notice that Goat has yet to answer the question or respond to Morrison's comment re Fortnite?What game?
I was with you until “she’d be better...”. Wow, please share how in the hell??The one positive thing about DJT being President is that this drunk woman isn't.
Seriously....WTF?
https://reason.com/blog/2018/09/12/clinton-pushes-fake-news-about-kavanaugh
Why can't our nation find non-mentally deranged people to run for POTUS? Is that too much to ask?
(FWIW she'd be better than the current clown by a mile....but she's still doesn't make the long bus).
Maybe your "owners" aren't part of the solution. I'm defining modern jobs as jobs that fit the modern situation. Society needs to adapt to automation and the global economy and create jobs to employ people and boost our economy to cover our debt, whether current "owners" help or hinder. The next politician who solves this riddle will be the first.
Go back to Mario 2, it’s nothing.WTF are you bitching about?
Srsly. I was playing a video game. What happened?
Of course not. Exact opposite. Take West Virginia for example. How to replace lost coal jobs? Maybe create a solar-panel-building industry? How to do that? Re-train the workers there, provide incentives for the industry, and so on. Or maybe create much more entrepreneurial activity and know-how there, to create smaller companies.JBM,
Trust you don't mean "socialism" as in government ownership when you talk about society needing to adapt.
Has he ever said or implied?Hillary is touting the myth that Kavanaugh calls birth control “abortion pills”.
Start teaching reasoning and creative thinking in our useless public schools again. Also, return the concept of apprenticeship, and introduce a method of exposure. How do you know if you are inclined or gifted toward something if you are never introduced? Guarantee there are geniuses among us that would thrive in mutiple sectors but how would they rise above obscurity in our cookie-cutter robot-styled classrooms?innovators and entrepreneurs. How to do that?
It's exacerbated by Kavanaugh's views on the Unitary Executive and the wisdom (if not the legality) of the President being "off limits" (my phrasing) with regards to subpoenas and investigations. Kavanaugh has made his views clear, that he would defer to the President in the sort of cases one can imagine could/will arise from the Mueller investigation. It's unprecedented that a SC Justice be nominated in the middle of an investigation where the President himself is under a cloud of suspicion and that case is likely to come before the Court.And under a normal situation it wouldn’t be about the person that nominated him. But under a normal situation, that judge wouldn’t likely be ruling on the President ‘s breaking the law or not either. That’s a pretty big difference.
No, but the base perceives as true, so yes.Has he ever said or implied?
Just curious.
And Mitch warned him that Kavanaugh could be one of the hardest judges on the list to get through. But for some reason, Trump picked him anyway.It's exacerbated by Kavanaugh's views on the Unitary Executive and the wisdom (if not the legality) of the President being "off limits" (my phrasing) with regards to subpoenas and investigations. Kavanaugh has made his views clear, that he would defer to the President in the sort of cases one can imagine could/will arise from the Mueller investigation. It's unprecedented that a SC Justice be nominated in the middle of an investigation where the President himself is under a cloud of suspicion and that case is likely to come before the Court.
Of course. The deficit and debt are the problems that tax revenue from the economy and jobs need to fix. The debt and deficit can't be wished away. The stimulus from the tax cuts is limited in comparison to the ballooning deficit. We'll know the problem is getting solved when tax revenues outpace the government expenditures. The solution has to be a modern economy with modern jobs. That's what Hillary told West Virginians. Trump told them he'd bring back jobs from the 50s. They voted for the past rather than the future. The question is, do Democrats actually know how to create modern jobs? I see no indication they do but if they do, they've got a serious messaging problem. I know for certain Republicans are clueless on modern jobs.
That's because I went straight to bed, then slept in, then straight to work.Anyone else notice that Goat has yet to answer the question or respond to Morrison's comment re Fortnite?
Maybe your "owners" aren't part of the solution. I'm defining modern jobs as jobs that fit the modern situation. Society needs to adapt to automation and the global economy and create jobs to employ people and boost our economy to cover our debt, whether current "owners" help or hinder. The next politician who solves this riddle will be the first.