ADVERTISEMENT

DeSantis stock goes up

Joe_Hoopsier said:
yep, illegally here. They bought a bill of goods that was (uhhm) to good to be true. Let the buyer beware. Now hope your happy asses back to south america.
Click to expand...
As has been repeatedly pointed out in this thread, they are not here illegally. They turned themselves in to authorities and applied for asylum. The law allows them to stay in the U.S. - and to travel within it - while their asylum claims are adjudicated.
 
TheOriginalHappyGoat said:
As has been repeatedly pointed out in this thread, they are not here illegally. They turned themselves in to authorities and applied for asylum. The law allows them to stay in the U.S. - and to travel within it - while their asylum claims are adjudicated.
Click to expand...
Asylum

Every year people come to the United States seeking protection because they have suffered persecution or fear that they will suffer persecution due to:

  • Race
  • Religion
  • Nationality
  • Membership in a particular social group
  • Political opinion
So all of these people pouring over the border are coming because of that? 99% have no clue what it even is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DANC
TheOriginalHappyGoat said:
As has been repeatedly pointed out in this thread, they are not here illegally. They turned themselves in to authorities and applied for asylum. The law allows them to stay in the U.S. - and to travel within it - while their asylum claims are adjudicated.
Click to expand...
And it’s been pointed out, it says AT A POINT OF ENTRY. Right?
IANAL , and I haven’t looked to see if uncle Joe and Pelosi have snaked that verbiage out lately.
It has never said, just wander on up anywhere, has it?

And even you know the asylum Schlick is crap
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Crayfish57, DANC and IU_Hickory
twenty02 said:
Sure man, some dead broke Venezuelan that just spent a month migrating through hell knows all about the fine print of some random grant program.

It was totally legit, nevermind. Hopefully next time they can even get the state flag correct.
Click to expand...
They seem to know about Title 42, since they're massing at the border waiting for it to expire.

Don't be bitter because you were duped by the media. Again.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Crayfish57 and Joe_Hoopsier
Joe_Hoopsier said:
And it’s been pointed out, it says AT A POINT OF ENTRY. Right?
IANAL , and I haven’t looked to see if uncle Joe and Pelosi have snaked that verbiage out lately.
It has never said, just wander on up anywhere, has it?

And even you know the asylum Schlick is crap
Click to expand...
What says "AT A POINT OF ENTRY?" I have no idea what you are talking about. These folks have applied for asylum, and U.S. law says they are legally allowed to stay here while their cases are adjudicated. You have a problem with that, take it up with the people who write the law. But don't sit here and pretend something is illegal when it isn't. Their presence is legal.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Crayfish57, outside shooter, IU_Hickory and 1 other person
TheOriginalHappyGoat said:
What says "AT A POINT OF ENTRY?" I have no idea what you are talking about. These folks have applied for asylum, and U.S. law says they are legally allowed to stay here while their cases are adjudicated. You have a problem with that, take it up with the people who write the law. But don't sit here and pretend something is illegal when it isn't. Their presence is legal.
Click to expand...
If they're coming across and turning themselves in for asylum, they have broken the law by not going through a port of entry.

These are people illegally entering the US and then claiming asylum when they're caught.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crayfish57 and Joe_Hoopsier
TheOriginalHappyGoat said:
What says "AT A POINT OF ENTRY?" I have no idea what you are talking about. These folks have applied for asylum, and U.S. law says they are legally allowed to stay here while their cases are adjudicated. You have a problem with that, take it up with the people who write the law. But don't sit here and pretend something is illegal when it isn't. Their presence is legal.
Click to expand...
This isn’t a court room to exercise your DA skillz, so don’t play coy with us.
We all know why they are coming here, it’s because DJT MAGA. None of us can begrudge them of that. But there are rules, and they are being led to skirt those rules on the fringes, of what (as you say) those people who not only enact but also enforce, those rules are leading them to do.
I’ve stated many times, and this is a 100% bipartisan point. The obfuscation from DC on this point for DECADES, should have them all strung up on Main Street. In my humble opinion.
Why didn’t you just walk into Harvard law school and say, too bad, I’m here, give me a degree? Because there’s rules.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Crayfish57, IU_Hickory and DANC
DANC said:
If they're coming across and turning themselves in for asylum, they have broken the law by not going through a port of entry.

These are people illegally entering the US and then claiming asylum when they're caught.
Click to expand...
It's possible some of them broke the law when they entered, but they are not here illegally. The law specifically grants them the right to stay while they go through their asylum process. Sorry if that bothers you.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Crayfish57 and outside shooter
TheOriginalHappyGoat said:
It's possible some of them broke the law when they entered, but they are not here illegally. The law specifically grants them the right to stay while they go through their asylum process. Sorry if that bothers you.
Click to expand...
Doesn't matter if it bothers me or not. Crossing the border illegally is a crime and they should be sent back to come in through a port of entry, as Trump had them do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crayfish57
Joe_Hoopsier said:
This isn’t a court room to exercise your DA skillz, so don’t play coy with us.
We all know why they are coming here, it’s because DJT MAGA. None of us can begrudge them of that. But there are rules, and they are being led to skirt those rules on the fringes, of what (as you say) those people who not only enact but also enforce, those rules are leading them to do.
I’ve stated many times, and this is a 100% bipartisan point. The obfuscation from DC on this point for DECADES, should have them all strung up on Main Street. In my humble opinion.
Why didn’t you just walk into Harvard law school and say, too bad, I’m here, give me a degree? Because there’s rules.
Click to expand...
Sober up and try again.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Crayfish57
DANC said:
Doesn't matter if it bothers me or not. Crossing the border illegally is a crime and they should be sent back to come in through a port of entry, as Trump had them do.
Click to expand...
Really? I always felt we should follow the law and apply the law. The law says they get to stay. If you have a problem with the law, vote for people who will change it.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Crayfish57
TheOriginalHappyGoat said:
It's possible some of them broke the law when they entered, but they are not here illegally. The law specifically grants them the right to stay while they go through their asylum process. Sorry if that bothers you.
Click to expand...
The time from which they enter illegally and are then are entered into the asylum process…. They are here illegally. Which should find their asylum claim null and void.
But we know who is enforcing this now. Knock off the sober up crap Goat. Child’s play.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Crayfish57, DANC and IU_Hickory
Joe_Hoopsier said:
The time from which they enter illegally and are then are entered into the asylum process…. They are here illegally. Which should find their asylum claim null and void.
But we know who is enforcing this now. Knock off the sober up crap Goat. Child’s play.
Click to expand...
You calling someone else post child's play is rich given your need to throw out insults.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Crayfish57
Joe_Hoopsier said:
The time from which they enter illegally and are then are entered into the asylum process…. They are here illegally. Which should find their asylum claim null and void.
But we know who is enforcing this now. Knock off the sober up crap Goat. Child’s play.
Click to expand...
They are here legally after they apply for asylum. And maybe before that. How many of them walked across a river, instead of entering at an official port of entry? Do you know? Five hundred dollars says you have no f*cking clue.

But whatever their status at the beginning, once they entered the asylum process, they were legal. They were here legally when DeSantis pulled his stunt. Period. Defend it all you want, them's the facts, my man.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Crayfish57, IU_Hickory, outside shooter and 1 other person
TheOriginalHappyGoat said:
Really? I always felt we should follow the law and apply the law. The law says they get to stay. If you have a problem with the law, vote for people who will change it.
Click to expand...
If you feel the law should be applied, you would want them to be escorted out to a port of entry, since they broke the law by entering the US illegally.

Illegally entering the US should nullify any actions they take until they follow the law - which is not to enter the US illegally.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crayfish57
DANC said:
If you feel the law should be applied, you would want them to be escorted out to a port of entry, since they broke the law by entering the US illegally.

Illegally entering the US should nullify any actions they take until they follow the law - which is not to enter the US illegally.
Click to expand...
No, I wouldn't, because I don't substitute my own personal animus for the actual law. The actual law says they get to stay. Sorry if you have a problem with that, but that's how it works. We follow the law in this country.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Crayfish57 and outside shooter
DANC said:
They seem to know about Title 42, since they're massing at the border waiting for it to expire.

Don't be bitter because you were duped by the media. Again.
Click to expand...

You claimed just a few hours ago this was a legitimate pamphlet coming from the state of MA....... well actually at first you didn't even know it existed....but I was duped? Ok.
 
twenty02 said:
You claimed just a few hours ago this was a legitimate pamphlet coming from the state of MA....... well actually at first you didn't even know it existed....but I was duped? Ok.
Click to expand...
It's a pamphlet that describes the Massachusetts rules. You still haven't identified any misinformation on the pamphlet that would mislead them.

Yeah, you were duped, but you aren't alone in that. Plenty of people believe news reports at face value.
 
DANC said:
It's a pamphlet that describes the Massachusetts rules. You still haven't identified any misinformation on the pamphlet that would mislead them.

Yeah, you were duped, but you aren't alone in that. Plenty of people believe news reports at face value.
Click to expand...

Are you this much of an exetreme anal retentive dick in real life, or just on here?
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: cosmickid, zeke4ahs and outside shooter
TheOriginalHappyGoat said:
As has been repeatedly pointed out in this thread, they are not here illegally. They turned themselves in to authorities and applied for asylum. The law allows them to stay in the U.S. - and to travel within it - while their asylum claims are adjudicated.
Click to expand...
That’s all pretty much wrong.

Asylum claims must be made at the first opportunity. You don’t get to travel through many different countries to claim assylum in the US. Moreover, it should be obvious to anyone with half a brain that thousands and thousands of people don’t have simultaneous individual legitimate claims for asylum. These people are economic migrants. Economic migration is not grounds for entry into the US. We are misusing the asylum process and the cartels who facilitate the migration know that. Finally catch and release is an administration policy, it isn’t the law. As far as immigration is concerned, we are definitely not a nation of laws. We are a nation of Biden/Harris/Mayorkas policy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DANC
CO. Hoosier said:
That’s all pretty much wrong.

Asylum claims must be made at the first opportunity. You don’t get to travel through many different countries to claim assylum in the US. Moreover, it should be obvious to anyone with half a brain that thousands and thousands of people don’t have simultaneous individual legitimate claims for asylum. These people are economic migrants. Economic migration is not grounds for entry into the US. We are misusing the asylum process and the cartels who facilitate the migration know that. Finally catch and release is an administration policy, it isn’t the law. As far as immigration is concerned, we are definitely not a nation of laws. We are a nation of Biden/Harris/Mayorkas policy.
Click to expand...
Shorter CoH:

75sx83.jpg
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Crayfish57
CO. Hoosier said:
That’s all pretty much wrong.

Asylum claims must be made at the first opportunity. You don’t get to travel through many different countries to claim assylum in the US. Moreover, it should be obvious to anyone with half a brain that thousands and thousands of people don’t have simultaneous individual legitimate claims for asylum. These people are economic migrants. Economic migration is not grounds for entry into the US. We are misusing the asylum process and the cartels who facilitate the migration know that. Finally catch and release is an administration policy, it isn’t the law. As far as immigration is concerned, we are definitely not a nation of laws. We are a nation of Biden/Harris/Mayorkas policy.
Click to expand...
Oh snap. Sit* down junior.

* upon further review, my edit team caught an error. We aim to provide the most accurate, up to date information. Corrections are made and we apologize.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DANC
DANC | | Crayfish


Q: What do you call the space between DANC and Crayfish?

A: The perineum!
 
CO. Hoosier said:
That’s all pretty much wrong.

Asylum claims must be made at the first opportunity. You don’t get to travel through many different countries to claim assylum in the US. Moreover, it should be obvious to anyone with half a brain that thousands and thousands of people don’t have simultaneous individual legitimate claims for asylum. These people are economic migrants. Economic migration is not grounds for entry into the US. We are misusing the asylum process and the cartels who facilitate the migration know that. Finally catch and release is an administration policy, it isn’t the law. As far as immigration is concerned, we are definitely not a nation of laws. We are a nation of Biden/Harris/Mayorkas policy.
Click to expand...

CO. Hoosier said:
it should be obvious to anyone with half a brain
Click to expand...
You do realize who you were responding to right? He apparently has no clue what asylum actually is or is confused with a mental institution. Anyone dumb enough to think all of these people pouring in have any claims to asylum has no business trying to quote any law to anyone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DANC
You must log in or register to reply here.
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back