ADVERTISEMENT

Coronavirus

Sharing his personal experience in China is fine..... then in the 2nd half of it, he acts like a WHO expert.... even though he admits at the beginning to not knowing anything. Wouldn't expect less from TPM, however.

I was talking about the UK kid from sglow's that experienced death and then survived to write about it. That type of shit is doing nothing but fueling panic and overreaction.
 
Only thing I can think of is that he seemed quick to ban travel to/from the affected region(s). Maybe it wasn't quick, but I recall some pundits complaining once he did it that he was being harsh.

That’s the only thing I can think of as well. Every other action has been either extremely late, disorganized or flat out wrong. Like bringing back folks from Wuhan against the advice of international authorities, and training the folks treating these folks literally five days after. There’s no doubt that helped spread the disease faster on the west coast. It probably would’ve happened anyway, but they turbo boosted it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrBing
There are two parts to this statement:

1) There is an obvious case where the WHO may be overestimating b/c of the number of unreported cases where people overcame the illness - hasn't the world been skeptical of the Chinese reported figures from the outset?

2) He's an idiot because he disagrees with scientists without providing any additional support. If he was ever competent enough to explain his basis for a statement, people MIGHT take him seriously (they wouldn't, but let's just pretend).

That’s the problem with Trump specifically. He literally creates in and lives in his own reality. Facts never enter into his thought process. He literally feels something, and finds a way to make it real. Usually through distortion, lying or blaming someone else.

He’s literally the worst person we could have at the helm during something like this. Certainty is key in these situations. And he’s never been a bastion of certainty. Quite the opposite.
 
I had teams scheduled for travel to Egypt and Saudi Arabia this month and next. Just canceled them on the advice of CENTCOM. Have a team scheduled for Thailand too, but that’s more than 60 days from now. I’m guessing we’ll cancel that one. Have a team returning from UAE today. If that had been scheduled for next week it would have been canceled too. This thing is obviously impacting business, but it’ll eventually pass.
 
That’s the problem with Trump specifically. He literally creates in and lives in his own reality. Facts never enter into his thought process. He literally feels something, and finds a way to make it real. Usually through distortion, lying or blaming someone else.

He’s literally the worst person we could have at the helm during something like this. Certainty is key in these situations. And he’s never been a bastion of certainty. Quite the opposite.

Agreed. If he would have just been calculated (not in his DNA I know) that the 3.4% fatality rate was high and not tried to throw out stupid guesses/estimates with zero basis, it would have been a Presidential approach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wiede
Well, he's writing about what he's seeing on the ground and what's happening in his life. Not sure why that's so scandalous. I'm sure all of this could be confirmed pretty easily if you find it to be too fantastic to believe.

Side point...I'm not advocating China's approach. No way that would go over in the US, but I am curious to see whose approach will be more effective. My guess is the extreme approach will be better than Trump's: doing nothing, advising people to go to work, and blaming it all on Obama. Just my humble opinion.


Hyperbole and anecdotes from a random, nameless internet poster aren't something I'm putting much interest in.
 
How's this article which confirms everything the guy said?

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/202...coronavirus-they-may-not-work-other-countries

I'll add Koch Brothers' scientists were involved with this.

These are some of the startling observations in a report released on 28 February from a mission organized by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Chinese government that allowed 13 foreigners to join 12 Chinese scientists on a tour of five cities in China to study the state of the COVID-19 epidemic and the effectiveness of the country’s response. The findings surprised several of the visiting scientists. “I thought there was no way those numbers could be real,” says epidemiologist Tim Eckmanns of the Robert Koch Institute, who was part of the mission.

But the report is unequivocal. “China’s bold approach to contain the rapid spread of this new respiratory pathogen has changed the course of a rapidly escalating and deadly epidemic,” it says. “This decline in COVID-19 cases across China is real.”

The question now is whether the world can take lessons from China’s apparent success—and whether the massive lockdowns and electronic surveillance measures imposed by an authoritarian government would work in other countries. “When you spend 20, 30 years in this business it’s like, ‘Seriously, you’re going to try and change that with those tactics?’” says Bruce Aylward, a Canadian WHO epidemiologist who led the international team and briefed journalists about its findings in Beijing and Geneva last week. “Hundreds of thousands of people in China did not get COVID-19 because of this aggressive response.”


I'm no expert, but I refer to the experts.



Hyperbole and anecdotes from a random, nameless internet poster aren't something I'm putting much interest in.
 
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsa...china-is-locking-down-half-a-billion-citizens

"In the weeks since Jan. 23, when Wuhan, Hubei's capital city, prohibited anyone from leaving, government officials across the province have gradually ramped up efforts to keep residents inside their houses. Apartment compounds allowed people to go in and out through one gate, each household could only send one person out once every three days to purchase groceries, and everyone's temperature is checked upon entrance."

Sound familiar?


Hyperbole and anecdotes from a random, nameless internet poster aren't something I'm putting much interest in.
 
How's this article which confirms everything the guy said?

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/202...coronavirus-they-may-not-work-other-countries

I'll add Koch Brothers' scientists were involved with this.

These are some of the startling observations in a report released on 28 February from a mission organized by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Chinese government that allowed 13 foreigners to join 12 Chinese scientists on a tour of five cities in China to study the state of the COVID-19 epidemic and the effectiveness of the country’s response. The findings surprised several of the visiting scientists. “I thought there was no way those numbers could be real,” says epidemiologist Tim Eckmanns of the Robert Koch Institute, who was part of the mission.

But the report is unequivocal. “China’s bold approach to contain the rapid spread of this new respiratory pathogen has changed the course of a rapidly escalating and deadly epidemic,” it says. “This decline in COVID-19 cases across China is real.”

The question now is whether the world can take lessons from China’s apparent success—and whether the massive lockdowns and electronic surveillance measures imposed by an authoritarian government would work in other countries. “When you spend 20, 30 years in this business it’s like, ‘Seriously, you’re going to try and change that with those tactics?’” says Bruce Aylward, a Canadian WHO epidemiologist who led the international team and briefed journalists about its findings in Beijing and Geneva last week. “Hundreds of thousands of people in China did not get COVID-19 because of this aggressive response.”


I'm no expert, but I refer to the experts.

Still too many unknowns.... will be one of those things where the accurate assessment of the situation will only be determined way in the rear view mirror, once it's generally over with.
 
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsa...china-is-locking-down-half-a-billion-citizens

"In the weeks since Jan. 23, when Wuhan, Hubei's capital city, prohibited anyone from leaving, government officials across the province have gradually ramped up efforts to keep residents inside their houses. Apartment compounds allowed people to go in and out through one gate, each household could only send one person out once every three days to purchase groceries, and everyone's temperature is checked upon entrance."

Sound familiar?


I'm well aware of the lockdowns.... that wasn't my critique. His personal experience is valid to share..... pontificating beyond that in the 2nd half of the post is rather as relevant as any poster on here discussing it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JamieDimonsBalls
TPM is actually quite level headed. You must not be reading it if you think differently. They deal in facts.

Sharing his personal experience in China is fine..... then in the 2nd half of it, he acts like a WHO expert.... even though he admits at the beginning to not knowing anything. Wouldn't expect less from TPM, however.
 
Cool, so you're ready to tell me it's not just one internet yahoo's opinion?

Still too many unknowns.... will be one of those things where the accurate assessment of the situation will only be determined way in the rear view mirror, once it's generally over with.
 
I don't know...the fact that the Trump Admin has done nothing and advising people to go to work is about as dumb as you can get. I'm not sure why pointing out the obvious to anyone with eyes and ears is "pontificating".

Amazing how people keep trying to give this Admin the benefit of the doubt when they have been unambiguous failures in everything they've touched. Unless, of course, it's about enriching their friends and family. That is where Trump Corp excels

I'm well aware of the lockdowns.... that wasn't my critique. His personal experience is valid to share..... pontificating beyond that in the 2nd half of the post is rather as relevant as any poster on here discussing it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IUgradman
Still too many unknowns.... will be one of those things where the accurate assessment of the situation will only be determined way in the rear view mirror, once it's generally over with.

Here's an article saying the exact opposite of the Chinese

https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-it...navirus-missteps-11583508932?mod=hp_lead_pos3

For almost three weeks, doctors struggled to connect the dots between Ms. Wei and other early cases, many of them Hua’nan vendors. Patient after patient reported similar symptoms, but many, like her, visited small, poorly resourced clinics and hospitals. Some patients balked at paying for chest scans; others, including Ms. Wei, refused to be transferred to bigger facilities that were better-equipped to identify infectious diseases.
...
When doctors did finally establish the Hua’nan link in late December, they quarantined Ms. Wei and others like her and raised the alarm to their superiors. But they were prevented by Chinese authorities from alerting their peers, let alone the public.

One of the first doctors to alert Chinese authorities was criticized for “spreading rumors” after sharing with a former medical-school classmate a test result showing a patient had a coronavirus. Another doctor had to write a self-criticism letter saying his warnings “had a negative impact.”

Even after Chinese President Xi Jinping personally ordered officials to control the outbreak on Jan. 7, authorities kept denying it could spread between humans—something doctors had known was happening since late December—and went ahead with a Chinese Lunar New Year banquet involving tens of thousands of families in Wuhan.

China has rejected any criticism of its epidemic response, saying it bought time for the rest of the world. Mr. Xi told 170,000 officials in a teleconference on Feb. 23 that the country’s leadership acted swiftly and cohesively since the beginning.
...
It now appears that, based on a speech by Mr. Xi published in a Communist Party magazine in February, he was leading the epidemic response when Wuhan went ahead with New Year celebrations despite the risk of wider infections. He was also leading the response when authorities let some five million people leave Wuhan without screening, and when they waited until Jan. 20 to announce the virus was spreading between humans.

As a result, the virus spread much more widely than it might have by the time Beijing locked down Wuhan and three other cities on Jan. 23, in the biggest quarantine in history. Those and other later measures appear to have slowed the spread within China’s borders, but the global consequences of the early missteps have been severe.

“A lot fewer people would have died” in China had the government acted sooner, said Ms. Wei, in an interview on Feb. 16. She is now fully recovered and back home in the two-bedroom apartment she has barely left for almost two months. Her daughter, infected in mid-January, was still in a field hospital, she said.

qd92UEa.png


 
Today in briefing with Trump, Azar, and Fauci, Azar says they have developed a vaccine in three days. Dr Fauci has to step in and tell him once again, there won’t be one available for a year or show. As I said, would sure be nice to be able to trust what we are hearing.,
Here's a tip: If it's Trump, don't assume it's true. It doesn't matter if you already generally doubted that flu shots would prevent coronavirus or that a vaccine could be developed in three months. If it's Trump well you know what to believe. (He's so stupid sometimes, it may not even be a lie.)
b8dd6506d2a04c4aace6ffb181a10520.jpg
 
I'm well aware of the lockdowns.... that wasn't my critique. His personal experience is valid to share..... pontificating beyond that in the 2nd half of the post is rather as relevant as any poster on here discussing it.
Yeah but your thing is cynical bludgeoning. :cool:
 
How's this article which confirms everything the guy said?

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/202...coronavirus-they-may-not-work-other-countries

I'll add Koch Brothers' scientists were involved with this.

These are some of the startling observations in a report released on 28 February from a mission organized by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Chinese government that allowed 13 foreigners to join 12 Chinese scientists on a tour of five cities in China to study the state of the COVID-19 epidemic and the effectiveness of the country’s response. The findings surprised several of the visiting scientists. “I thought there was no way those numbers could be real,” says epidemiologist Tim Eckmanns of the Robert Koch Institute, who was part of the mission.

But the report is unequivocal. “China’s bold approach to contain the rapid spread of this new respiratory pathogen has changed the course of a rapidly escalating and deadly epidemic,” it says. “This decline in COVID-19 cases across China is real.”

The question now is whether the world can take lessons from China’s apparent success—and whether the massive lockdowns and electronic surveillance measures imposed by an authoritarian government would work in other countries. “When you spend 20, 30 years in this business it’s like, ‘Seriously, you’re going to try and change that with those tactics?’” says Bruce Aylward, a Canadian WHO epidemiologist who led the international team and briefed journalists about its findings in Beijing and Geneva last week. “Hundreds of thousands of people in China did not get COVID-19 because of this aggressive response.”


I'm no expert, but I refer to the experts.
What’s not being said is that China’s lockdown at their economic expense might have saved the rest of the world.
 
I'm guessing he's had his flu vaccination. If he has he should tour a hospital were they are treating people for the virus. I mean it's just like the flu and the same vaccine and his superior genetics will render him immune.
Trump? Oh wow. Trump is as paranoid as Howard Hughes was:

https://www.newsweek.com/trump-scared-germs-needs-drink-straw-avoid-contamination-671730

I'd say Trump's views on healthcare are the same as Trump's views on the economy amd everything else: "i've got mine, so go screw everyone else."
 
  • Like
Reactions: sglowrider
A View from China

TPM Reader PH gives us a wild, bracing, sobering view from China. This is a must-read:

I’ve been following the COVID-19 cataclysm, as I believe it is, very closely. One reason is that I had the fortunate timing of moving to Beijing from San Francisco in January 2020. I’m far from any kind of expert on China or epidemiology, but as a longtime TPM reader and Prime AF member, I thought I’d share some experiences and thoughts.

The governmental response has been extraordinary, and the national quarantine is total. In February, I only had two places I could go: the place I was staying and the grocery store Carrefour. When entering either, I have my temperature taken by a security guard, and if it were elevated I would go into mandated quarantine. I got caught in a non-tier 1 city for the month after LNY, and for weeks returning to Beijing was out of the question. After I finally returned to Beijing, I received regular phone calls from the police to confirm I was abiding by the self-quarantine, including a door check. Recently it has been loosening up, but most white collar workers are still opting to work from home. Masks are required and ubiquitous. From a personal tech perspective, we are able to have groceries cheaply delivered twice per week, and when we purchase goods in person it’s all self-checkout via QR code, as potentially virus-carrying cash hasn’t been too common in China for awhile. In the past week, the only people I’ve interacted with in person are my security guard and my girlfriend.

Once the threat of COVID-19 was identified, the government was willing and able to sacrifice the economy–what too many Western observers think of as its sole legitimizer–and put all of Chinese society on a total wartime footing against the coronavirus, in the span of one or two weeks. And it’s been wildly effective. It’s really the most impressive deployment of state capacity I’ve seen. It wouldn’t happen in the USA, but moreover it couldn’t happen in the USA even if we wanted it to.

I joke with my friends now that I have a sofa they can crash on if things get bad stateside, but I’m only half joking. Singapore and Taiwan responded to coronavirus very effectively (preventing even the start of community spread), South Korea competently, Italy with a level of mediocrity, and Iran with deep incompetence. The US will likely end up somewhere between Italy and Iran. Because of the test kit fiasco and the resultant lack of rigorous contact tracing, as well as messaging from national leadership, we don’t even know where we stand now, and in the early stages of exponential growth that’s a very bad place to be. The government is unable and unwilling to take the actions necessary to slow the spread, apparently for fear of spooking the markets, which Trump identifies as *his* sole legitimizer. All of that is to say, I wouldn’t be surprised if China issues a travel ban
on Americans by April.

Amartya Sen argued democracy was the cure for disasters such as famine, because it and the free press facilitate the flow of information from the reality on the ground to the national leadership and provides the incentives to address issues correctly. And that argument still has some power: the disconnect between medical officials and bureaucrats in Hubei and the national Chinese leadership contributed to this disaster. But in a post-truth world where power wills its own reality, does democracy still have those feedback mechanisms that give it the edge? When I talk to people in China, the general sense is that China essentially got a pop quiz and scored a B+, while other countries are getting a take home exam and failing it. Buy into that analogy or not, if the USA and the West more broadly flunk this test, the Chinese model will be gaining legitimacy over democracy, not losing it. And that loss in legitimacy will happen everywhere, not just in China.
I can't imagine what is essentially marshal law in America. Crazy.
 
Last edited:
A View from China

TPM Reader PH gives us a wild, bracing, sobering view from China. This is a must-read:

I’ve been following the COVID-19 cataclysm, as I believe it is, very closely. One reason is that I had the fortunate timing of moving to Beijing from San Francisco in January 2020. I’m far from any kind of expert on China or epidemiology, but as a longtime TPM reader and Prime AF member, I thought I’d share some experiences and thoughts.

The governmental response has been extraordinary, and the national quarantine is total. In February, I only had two places I could go: the place I was staying and the grocery store Carrefour. When entering either, I have my temperature taken by a security guard, and if it were elevated I would go into mandated quarantine. I got caught in a non-tier 1 city for the month after LNY, and for weeks returning to Beijing was out of the question. After I finally returned to Beijing, I received regular phone calls from the police to confirm I was abiding by the self-quarantine, including a door check. Recently it has been loosening up, but most white collar workers are still opting to work from home. Masks are required and ubiquitous. From a personal tech perspective, we are able to have groceries cheaply delivered twice per week, and when we purchase goods in person it’s all self-checkout via QR code, as potentially virus-carrying cash hasn’t been too common in China for awhile. In the past week, the only people I’ve interacted with in person are my security guard and my girlfriend.

Once the threat of COVID-19 was identified, the government was willing and able to sacrifice the economy–what too many Western observers think of as its sole legitimizer–and put all of Chinese society on a total wartime footing against the coronavirus, in the span of one or two weeks. And it’s been wildly effective. It’s really the most impressive deployment of state capacity I’ve seen. It wouldn’t happen in the USA, but moreover it couldn’t happen in the USA even if we wanted it to.

I joke with my friends now that I have a sofa they can crash on if things get bad stateside, but I’m only half joking. Singapore and Taiwan responded to coronavirus very effectively (preventing even the start of community spread), South Korea competently, Italy with a level of mediocrity, and Iran with deep incompetence. The US will likely end up somewhere between Italy and Iran. Because of the test kit fiasco and the resultant lack of rigorous contact tracing, as well as messaging from national leadership, we don’t even know where we stand now, and in the early stages of exponential growth that’s a very bad place to be. The government is unable and unwilling to take the actions necessary to slow the spread, apparently for fear of spooking the markets, which Trump identifies as *his* sole legitimizer. All of that is to say, I wouldn’t be surprised if China issues a travel ban
on Americans by April.

Amartya Sen argued democracy was the cure for disasters such as famine, because it and the free press facilitate the flow of information from the reality on the ground to the national leadership and provides the incentives to address issues correctly. And that argument still has some power: the disconnect between medical officials and bureaucrats in Hubei and the national Chinese leadership contributed to this disaster. But in a post-truth world where power wills its own reality, does democracy still have those feedback mechanisms that give it the edge? When I talk to people in China, the general sense is that China essentially got a pop quiz and scored a B+, while other countries are getting a take home exam and failing it. Buy into that analogy or not, if the USA and the West more broadly flunk this test, the Chinese model will be gaining legitimacy over democracy, not losing it. And that loss in legitimacy will happen everywhere, not just in China.
I can't imagine what is essentially marshal law in America. Crazy.

Let's face it. These signs prove the U.S. has no chance of minimizing this disease:

S-14799.jpg

If the U.S. population was even minimally health conscious, and if local health officials were even minimally diligent in enforcing health rules, it would not be necessary to even have these signs.
 
I go through LA airport next week. If I get quarantined in Hawaii I’m kinda ok with that....
You know what's ironic... The gf has been posted to Tianjin/Beijing for a project next week onwards.
One of the requirement is that she needs to be quarantined in her hotel for two weeks in Shanghai before starting work there. :rolleyes:
 
You know what's ironic... The gf has been posted to Tianjin/Beijing for a project next week onwards.
One of the requirement is that she needs to be quarantined in her hotel for two weeks in Shanghai before starting work there. :rolleyes:
AIA2P?
 
Here's a tip: If it's Trump, don't assume it's true. It doesn't matter if you already generally doubted that flu shots would prevent coronavirus or that a vaccine could be developed in three months. If it's Trump well you know what to believe. (He's so stupid sometimes, it may not even be a lie.)
.
Here's even better advice. On this issue in particular, if Trump says it, completely ignore it. He doesn't know or care what TF he's talking about. Listen to experts.
 
I have read some pretty alarming analyses of what is happening and is to come. The US has no idea of the extent of the outbreak and is comically behind on testing. The spread of the virus is so far ahead of health authorities we are looking at an epidemic. Combine that with the devolved nature of the government in the US and you will get a haphazard, state by state, county by county approach to containment and mitigation. Americans love their freedom too much to ever tolerate a lockdown on their movement which is apparently what it takes to curb the spread.

Dr. Fauci said that 20% of cases result in hospitalization and if this virus infects millions of people you are looking at a completely overwhelmed medical system. There aren’t nearly enough beds to treat this and the US can’t build a field hospital in a week like China. The lack of universal healthcare and paid sick leave means a lot of people won’t seek treatment or stay home from work if they feel ill.

The President refuses to acknowledge the severity of the crisis and the people in charge of its management can’t say anything to upset Dear Leader who is only concerned about his political prospects. We live in very scary times.
 
Last edited:
Americans love their freedom too much to ever tolerate a lockdown on their movement which is apparently what it takes to curb the spread.
.

This I agree with. Americans would never tolerate the draconian measures required to contain a severe outbreak in the way that the Chinese and many other countries can implement. Plus, Americans have a certain arrogance about them that gets in the way of voluntarily locking themselves down. Everyone sees themselves and their own endeavors as "too important" to be interrupted.

That said, I think some of the more dire prognostications (such as the one linked by Cream&Crimson above) are probably a tad over the top. But who knows?
 
This I agree with. Americans would never tolerate the draconian measures required to contain a severe outbreak in the way that the Chinese and many other countries can implement. Plus, Americans have a certain arrogance about them that gets in the way of voluntarily locking themselves down. Everyone sees themselves and their own endeavors as "too important" to be interrupted.

That said, I think some of the more dire prognostications (such as the one linked by Cream&Crimson above) are probably a tad over the top. But who knows?
Not to make light of any of this, but to add a silver-lining, albeit small, apparently there's a massive inventory of lobster that can't be shipped and is super cheap. Time to hit the grocery store.
 
20/20 had a two hour segment on it last night. What was disturbing, among other things, is the amount of medicines/pills we get from China and the disruption the virus can cause in our ability to get same. The economy portion of the story began largely with retailers who make products in China struggling because of all of the plants/factories closing in China, but again the disturbing part is how reliant we are upon China for meds/pills.
 
20/20 had a two hour segment on it last night. What was disturbing, among other things, is the amount of medicines/pills we get from China and the disruption the virus can cause in our ability to get same. The economy portion of the story began largely with retailers who make products in China struggling because of all of the plants/factories closing in China, but again the disturbing part is how reliant we are upon China for meds/pills.
You are Chimerica.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT