Bribes like $93 for daddy's little girl from Democrat donors, Skippy?If only that was the sole issue with thomas...
I would say Thomas taking bribes is the bigger issue
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bribes like $93 for daddy's little girl from Democrat donors, Skippy?If only that was the sole issue with thomas...
I would say Thomas taking bribes is the bigger issue
The GOP and the federalist society can be independent and advocate for the same or similar positions. One is not the extension of the other.Not only is the Federalist society essentially an extension of the GOP
The idea that the federal government was created by the people through the states is deeply imbedded in our governmental structure. Somebody like Biden has neither the authority, let alone the wisdom, to tell the states what to do. If a state steps out of line under the 14th amendment, only the courts can remedy that, not Joe Biden or the AG. This is what federalism means and if that is a conservative ideal, then live with it. Good thing we have a federalist society to remind all of us how the constitution works.Not only is the Federalist society essentially an extension of the GOP in a political sense, but they also embrace a judicial interpretation that embraces conservative ideals.
You have no clue what it takes to be a competent judge. Of all the factors experience is nowhere near the top of the list. All experience can do is make the good better or the bad worse.Yet despite that, the people who have criticized her have done so based on her (erroneous) interpretations of the law. Nobody has threatened her family or attacked her on the sole basis she's a Republican.The reality is most judges in that judicial district are going to be members of the GOP, and most of the members of the 11th Circuit (which has reprimanded her twice already) are GOP apointees. The issue is her incompetence/inexperience in dealing with cases involving national security.
Trump is not just a criminal defendant. He is a candidate for President and a member of a political party opposite that of the judge and prosecutor. The sole reason for this prosecution is because of his candidacy. The case is weak shit, the feds passed on it years ago ..The case is an abuse of the judicial process and prohibiting Trump from talking about that makes it worse. The topper is the Judge’s family members are paid operatives of the judge’s party opposing Trump.Trump is a criminal defendant, and I'll point out again that you would not be in favor of allowing any other criminal defendant to engage in behavior that could endanger officers of the court or their families.
Bribes like $93 for daddy's little girl from Democrat donors, Skippy?
I think that's mostly backwards.The sole reason for this prosecution is because of his candidacy.
The sole reason for this prosecution is because of his candidacy.
I think that's mostly backwards.
The reason that Trump officially began his candidacy 6 months to a year sooner than normal is that he was facing prosecution on multiple fronts. He wanted the above handy one-liner, something that all of his gullible supporters would swallow, hook, line and sinker.
Trump running again was neither a secret nor was it a surprise.Yet the prosecutions started well before he announced his candidacy... Facts matter.
True, but there were lots of financial reasons to delay the official announcement. He wouldn't, and it isn't just me saying that one major motivation to paint the already ongoing criminal investigations as being campaign interference.Trump running again was neither a secret nor was it a surprise.
Trumps a Manhattan ass, But you know what is totally awesome...True, but there were lots of financial reasons to delay the official announcement. He wouldn't, and it isn't just me saying that one major motivation to paint the already ongoing criminal investigations as being campaign interference.
"Trump’s urgency to announce also comes from wanting to get ahead of potential indictments in any of the several ongoing criminal investigations into his conduct. He and close associates are under multiple criminal investigations..."
Loading…
www.washingtonpost.com
it's truly amazing that you can try to spin it that he is being indicted because he is a candidate, when the indictments arise out of investigations that began years before he was a candidate.
I don't recall ever posting about Ginni Thomas. Not saying I didn't and you may be able to find a post where I did. But as of this moment I don't recall it...You sure seem to care about Clarence Thomas' wife being an outspoken Trump supporter.
Again, you spend a lot of time typing out words that say nothing.
I'm not going to waste time arguing your opinion. I just choose to adopt positions from people I consider more intelligent...However when discussing demonstrable facts...The GOP and the federalist society can be independent and advocate for the same or similar positions. One is not the extension of the other.
The idea that the federal government was created by the people through the states is deeply imbedded in our governmental structure. Somebody like Biden has neither the authority, let alone the wisdom, to tell the states what to do. If a state steps out of line under the 14th amendment, only the courts can remedy that, not Joe Biden or the AG. This is what federalism means and if that is a conservative ideal, then live with it. Good thing we have a federalist society to remind all of us how the constitution works.
You have no clue what it takes to be a competent judge. Of all the factors experience is nowhere near the top of the list. All experience can do is make the good better or the bad worse.
Trump is not just a criminal defendant. He is a candidate for President and a member of a political party opposite that of the judge and prosecutor. The sole reason for this prosecution is because of his candidacy. The case is weak shit, the feds passed on it years ago ..The case is an abuse of the judicial process and prohibiting Trump from talking about that makes it worse. The topper is the Judge’s family members are paid operatives of the judge’s party opposing Trump.
Here you go. Does this give you any encouragement whatsoever about this stock? LOLI wouldn’t touch that stock.
It's a sucker's bet to invest in that stock. It loses money and I don't see it ever making money. In six months Trump will probably file to sell all he has to try to salvage something from it and it'll tank even more.Here you go. Does this give you any encouragement whatsoever about this stock? LOL
Loading…
www.cnn.com
Maybe Trump will imagine he made another change mentally (but not digitally or on paper).
Trump is just a hell of a guy, isn't he?
lol… you don’t think Don hasn’t already leveraged his holdings on an ipo? That was set up 6 months before we heard about the “go public” crap…It's a sucker's bet to invest in that stock. It loses money and I don't see it ever making money. In six months Trump will probably file to sell all he has to try to salvage something from it and it'll tank even more.
How would he do that without breaking the law?lol… you don’t think Don hasn’t already leveraged his holdings on an ipo? That was set up 6 months before we heard about the “go public” crap…
Winning!! Sorry squabby. Like it or not… trumpy ain’t loosing in this.
What we are seeing is all rear view mirror.
It’s not personal. … well, almost not, now.
DJT is like Tyson fighting 6th grade democrats, who once drove a boat.
They got close!
Of course you don'tI don't recall ever posting about Ginni Thomas. Not saying I didn't and you may be able to find a post where I did. But as of this moment I don't recall it...
The only way I could answer that is if I was 1) already a part of the swamp or 2) had enough $$ to pay CPA's/ attorney's that were in touch with swamp loop holes.How would he do that without breaking the law?
I can read a post and know you wrote it. And I don’t mean that as a compliment.The only way I could answer that is if I was 1) already a part of the swamp or 2) had enough $$ to pay CPA's/ attorney's that were in touch with swamp loop holes.
I am neither... But I damn sure bet you Donald is. And I'd double dog bet you that Pelosi has money in the IPO. That old hag aint up there because she cares about "her people" and I bet "Art of the Deal" knows to grease her palms just a bit... Just like Mitt did... Mcaine did.. sissienger.. Lock up robot Mitch McConnell
Trump knows, if you are dealing with serpents, feed them their favorite food... Swamp $$$ that doest cost you shit !!
I'll buy you 6 wings a beer and a shot, if Nancy didn't make money off this Trump IPO deal !
Well MTG ain't got time to type, if I'm takin care of business. You can bet she is biting the pillow, like your mom on a Mike Lendell commercial. $25 for the set !!I can read a post and know you wrote it. And I don’t mean that as a compliment.
Do you run MTG’s social media accounts too?
F you. You’re a dipshit. No, wait, dipshits still have a pea sized brain, you’re an imbecile. And bringing my mom into this, who I just left in a physical therapy rehab facility this evening? Go F yourself. Dumbass.Well MTG ain't got time to type, if I'm takin care of business. You can bet she is biting the pillow, like your mom on a Mike Lendell commercial. $25 for the set !!
Seriously. You’re a moron.F you. You’re a dipshit. No, wait, dipshits still have a pea sized brain, you’re an imbecile. And bringing my mom into this, who I just left in a physical therapy rehab facility this evening? Go F yourself. Dumbass.
So you think Trump is a swamp creature in cahoots with Nancy Pelosi? That’s one extremely disjointed post.The only way I could answer that is if I was 1) already a part of the swamp or 2) had enough $$ to pay CPA's/ attorney's that were in touch with swamp loop holes.
I am neither... But I damn sure bet you Donald is. And I'd double dog bet you that Pelosi has money in the IPO. That old hag aint up there because she cares about "her people" and I bet "Art of the Deal" knows to grease her palms just a bit... Just like Mitt did... Mcaine did.. sissienger.. Lock up robot Mitch McConnell
Trump knows, if you are dealing with serpents, feed them their favorite food... Swamp $$$ that doest cost you shit !!
I'll buy you 6 wings a beer and a shot, if Nancy didn't make money off this Trump IPO deal !
And bringing my mom into this, who I just left in a physical therapy rehab facility this evening?
Easy there, killer.F you. You’re a dipshit. No, wait, dipshits still have a pea sized brain, you’re an imbecile. And bringing my mom into this, who I just left in a physical therapy rehab facility this evening? Go F yourself. Dumbass.
Yes indeed. She's doing well. Thanks for asking. She somehow wrangled her way into a very plush rehab facility for ~5 days. She was very relieved to find a brand new 42 inch screen in her room with ESPN and TBS show she could watch both Final Fours (men and women).New knee, right? How's she doing? I bet she'll be back swimming in no time.
Yes indeed. She's doing well. Thanks for asking. She somehow wrangled her way into a very plush rehab facility for ~5 days.
Didn't bother to do a search, did you.? Since I try to deal in facts (no idea what you deal in is called) I did a post search on my mentioning of the term "Ginni Thomas". Counting the initial response I made to you in this thread I came up with 3 times I mentioned the name Ginni Thomas.Of course you don't
I don't usually watch hour+ videos from people I agree with. Much less someone named "Barnes" that I've never heard of...Barnes brought the 🔥 last night on the corrupt NY judges. Where is he wrong anyone? Start at the 53:00 mark.
Didn't bother to do a search, did you.? Since I try to deal in facts (no idea what you deal in is called) I did a post search on my mentioning of the term "Ginni Thomas". Counting the initial response I made to you in this thread I came up with 3 times I mentioned the name Ginni Thomas.
In addition to just now (in this tread), there were two posts I mentioned her in 2018 (apparently before you graced us with your presence) and neither post suggested Thomas should recuse himself. In fact both dealt with her spreading misinformation thru her social media.
But that was 6 yrs ago before we were even aware of her role in Jan 6. Which means trying to falsely assert that I whined over recusal like you are doing here is a fabrication if not outright lie. I doubt anyone hear would be shocked to discover that you're once again dealing in misinformation. That's your MO...
Let's review how this got started. I made a statement that it was immaterial that Merchan's daughter was a "Democrat". I pointed out the blatant hypocrisy of you whining about her occupation, which has nothing to do with the case since she's not even in the same state, while simultaneously totally ignoring the Cannon factor.
For example, how often does a criminal defendant have a judge make rulings/preside over his case that he personally appointed? That doesn't bother you, but you're upset because the daughter of the judge in a case in NY where Stormy Daniels will testify about Trump's micro penis has a job in Chicago and is a Democrat? That bothers you, not the fact that Trump personally appointed Cannon and she will likely further benefit career wise if he's elected?
But you didn't even discuss Cannon, but instead tried to draw some false equivalence to my posts regarding Merchan and Ginni Thomas. But since as I've pointed out I haven't posted about GT, it's just another bad faith argument from you which you employ when the facts aren't on your side.
I think he (and others like him) truly believes that with every fiber of his being. They actually believe all 88 counts are bullshit, that it's a witch hunt, the Deep State is behind it, etc. On Monday they'll claim Biden is nothing but a senile old fool and the next day he's the mastermind of the DOJ, pulling all the strings and calling all the shots. Of course, there is absolutely no evidence that Biden has guided any of these investigations or prosecutions.You really think Trump didn't do any of the things he's been indicted for?
OK. I watched about 5 minutes. Here's where he's wrong:Barnes brought the 🔥 last night on the corrupt NY judges. Where is he wrong anyone? Start at the 53:00 mark.
It doesn't matter which of you mental degenerates mentioned her - you were in agreement.Didn't bother to do a search, did you.? Since I try to deal in facts (no idea what you deal in is called) I did a post search on my mentioning of the term "Ginni Thomas". Counting the initial response I made to you in this thread I came up with 3 times I mentioned the name Ginni Thomas.
In addition to just now (in this tread), there were two posts I mentioned her in 2018 (apparently before you graced us with your presence) and neither post suggested Thomas should recuse himself. In fact both dealt with her spreading misinformation thru her social media.
But that was 6 yrs ago before we were even aware of her role in Jan 6, or Jan 6 had even happened. Which means trying to falsely assert that I whined over recusal like you are doing here is a fabrication, if not outright lie. I doubt anyone here would be shocked to discover that you're once again dealing in misinformation. That's your MO...
Let's review how this got started. I made a statement that it was immaterial that Merchan's daughter was a "Democrat". I pointed out the blatant hypocrisy of you whining about her occupation, which has nothing to do with the case since she's not even in the same state, while simultaneously totally ignoring the Cannon factor.
For example, how often does a criminal defendant have a judge make rulings/preside over his case that he personally appointed? That doesn't bother you, but you're upset because the daughter of the judge in a case in NY where Stormy Daniels will testify about Trump's micro penis has a job in Chicago and is a Democrat? That bothers you, not the fact that Trump personally appointed Cannon and she will likely further benefit career wise if he's elected?
But you didn't even discuss Cannon, but instead tried to draw some false equivalence to my posts regarding Merchan and Ginni Thomas. But since as I've pointed out I haven't posted about GT, it's just another bad faith argument from you which you inevitably employ when the facts aren't on your side.
Well that's certainly different...You make something up regarding what I posted. And then when I give you the oppty to provide an example of me posting what you claim I posted, then you shift the goal post to tell me what I was thinking yet never posted?It doesn't matter which of you mental degenerates mentioned her - you were in agreement.
Stop being disingenuous.
Well that's certainly different...You make something up regarding what I posted. And then when I give you the oppty to provide an example of me posting what you claim I posted, then you shift the goal post to tell me what I was thinking yet never posted?
You must be NostraDANCus...
The Hick in your name is....well.... obvious.the C in DANC stands for Cleo. Mr. Cleo.
That the best you can do?The Hick in your name is....well.... obvious.
Sorry it's not on the level of your witty repartee.That the best you can do?