ADVERTISEMENT

zrno decommits

That one was very suspicious to begin with. It had pure money hire written all over it. Woodson was trying to generate some kind of positive direction toward next year. Might have been an I-owe-U situation.
 
It's sad, but it seems stupid to not shop yourself around widely seeking the best offer.

Then you can still pick the best fit as far as school, majors, and other factors, after you know the top three or four bids.
,
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: nichlee and kkott
When new management comes in, many update their resumes just in case. Guess we'll see once CDD has a chance to speak to all the returning players individually. Remember, TJD was leaving for the NBA until Woodson sat down with he and his parents.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IUgradman
That is exactly the point CDD said in his press conference: the player has to be here for the right reasons he listed. If it’s just money, move on and find the players that want to be here.
Hmmm 🤔. Interesting concept.
 
What happened to his "love of the IU basketball history" he claimed when he committed? This is good and doesn't surprise me. It was all about the money and any possible promises made to him by Woodson. Besides 6'6" 3 point shooters are a dime a dozen in college basketball, you just have to recruit them, close and sign them.
 
I don’t understand the assumption that he chasing money. It is very typical of a recruit to reopen his recruitment when a coach leaves, for whatever reason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nichlee
Completely correct.
I don't understand why so many others didn't get that.
False. People understand that logic, however, what people are questioning is why he doesn't want him. More importantly, how he knows he doesmt want him and he didnt even talk to him. Our roster is not exactly flowing over. Come on, do better.
 
False. People understand that logic, however, what people are questioning is why he doesn't want him. More importantly, how he knows he doesmt want him and he didnt even talk to him. Our roster is not exactly flowing over. Come on, do better.
He mentioned the amount of film he’s been pouring over in an interview a couple days ago. Starts and ends his days reviewing film. Waking hours filled with talking, recruiting, etc…. Getting about 4 hours of sleep.

Not a stretch to think he’s watched the film. Talked about Zyrno with trusted contacts, and isn’t interested.

I would put that at about 10x more likely than DeVries ducking them, being lazy, or whatever negative inference people can dream up.
 
He mentioned the amount of film he’s been pouring over in an interview a couple days ago. Starts and ends his days reviewing film. Waking hours filled with talking, recruiting, etc…. Getting about 4 hours of sleep.

Not a stretch to think he’s watched the film. Talked about Zyrno with trusted contacts, and isn’t interested.

I would put that at about 10x more likely than DeVries ducking them, being lazy, or whatever negative inference people can dream up.
Who has any negative inference? Haha People are so weird.
 
He should at least return the call or text and say no thanks. No sense in burning bridges with the agent. Too little info to make a judgement though.
Nope, you don't get it. He watched video and now he owes no one any respect. It's 10x more likely he knows better than you.
 
Or maybe Zyrnos people are lying? Agents would never do that? Never.
It's possible. So you would agree that it's weird, right? Haha The exact point that was made. Something is strange, no one knows what.
 
False. People understand that logic, however, what people are questioning is why he doesn't want him. More importantly, how he knows he doesmt want him and he didnt even talk to him. Our roster is not exactly flowing over. Come on, do better.
You’re right, no inferences. You made your position pretty clear in this post. You’re calling DeVries out on this.

Maybe Zyrnos market value isn’t what they thought and they’re trying to bring IU back into to the convo?

I don’t know DeVries, never met him, maybe he’s lying about working 20+ hours a day right now to field a team? Maybe he is unprofessional enough to not at least send a “thanks but no thanks” text? I don’t know? But I do know an agent lying about it probably more likely.
 
You’re right, no inferences. You made your position pretty clear in this post. You’re calling DeVries out on this.

Maybe Zyrnos market value isn’t what they thought and they’re trying to bring IU back into to the convo?

I don’t know DeVries, never met him, maybe he’s lying about working 20+ hours a day right now to field a team? Maybe he is unprofessional enough to not at least send a “thanks but no thanks” text? I don’t know? But I do know an agent lying about it probably more likely.
Haha What are you blabbering on about? You make up false situations, that you yourself made up and somehow pretend it justifies the nonsese rattling around in your head.

No one is calling DeVries out at all. He may have logic, and that was clearly defined. However, unlike you, I don't blindly assume. You assumed Woodson wasn't making mistake after mistake. Defended him until you finally came around.

What you need to realize is its OK to question things. You don't need to be as mentally soft as Charmin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ulrey
You’re right, no inferences. You made your position pretty clear in this post. You’re calling DeVries out on this.

Maybe Zyrnos market value isn’t what they thought and they’re trying to bring IU back into to the convo?

I don’t know DeVries, never met him, maybe he’s lying about working 20+ hours a day right now to field a team? Maybe he is unprofessional enough to not at least send a “thanks but no thanks” text? I don’t know? But I do know an agent lying about it probably more likely.
One thing we know. If that text is real - I really don't care to find out - the agent is unprofessional.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IndyMitchell
Haha What are you blabbering on about? You make up false situations, that you yourself made up and somehow pretend it justifies the nonsese rattling around in your head.

No one is calling DeVries out at all. He may have logic, and that was clearly defined. However, unlike you, I don't blindly assume. You assumed Woodson wasn't making mistake after mistake. Defended him until you finally came around.

What you need to realize is its OK to question things. You don't need to be as mentally soft as Charmin.
You must have the wrong poster. I was off the Woodson wagon 2 weeks in to his first season. Gave his hiring a famous C+ grade, etc…

If I’m misinterpreting the post I just responded to…that you finished with “do better”…my bad. Sounds like you’re calling DeVries out.
 
You must have the wrong poster. I was off the Woodson wagon 2 weeks in to his first season. Gave his hiring a famous C+ grade, etc…

If I’m misinterpreting the post I just responded to…that you finished with “do better”…my bad. Sounds like you’re calling DeVries out.
No, I was calling out that poster for misrepresenting what people said. My point was for the poster to do better.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT