Some lawyers like cameras. He's apparently one. MSNBC likes Trump's opponents. He's definitely one.
Stupid question, I suppose; maybe what I meant to ask is whether there are any TV news outlets I can turn on without becoming dumber by the moment.Some lawyers like cameras. He's apparently one. MSNBC likes Trump's opponents. He's definitely one.
BBC America is okay.
That's the lowest of low bars and doesn't make MSNBC any less damaging to the brain.
Some lawyers like cameras. He's apparently one. MSNBC likes Trump's opponents. He's definitely one.
Well, you pick from the options available to you, and I don't have BBCA on my package right now.
Probably a book deal and a top position in the next Democratic White House circa 2021.
The snark in me says it's hard to go wrong when we latch on to a relentless self-promoter. What could go wrong?
By the way, what's the 'enlightened' view on Stormy Daniels? Is it inappropriate to look down our noses at porn stars? What's the most favorable argument in her favor for newsworthiness and for hitching a wagon to her star?
Why would we look down our noses at porn stars?
There's abundant reason for snark, but speaking as a partisan, I'm happy that Avenatti is taking Trump on, because I think Democratic candidates are better off talking about how Republicans are screwing the middle class in favor of the wealthy by cutting rich people's taxes and taking away ordinary people's health insurance. And I had the same question you did: How in the wide world of sports did Avenatti get access to Cohen's financial records?
If the President were a smart man, he'd be considering reasons why he can't get competent counsel.
My take on Stormy Daniels is that she's a pretty cold fish for a porn star, but she's newsworthy because the President of the United States is a sleazeball, not because she is. She's getting much more than her 15 minutes (thanks to her lawyer), but that's because Trump is a deeply compromised person -- vulnerable to porn stars, Vladimir Putin, and Mueller only knows who else.
I'm not suggesting that Stormy Daniels is a sleazeball.
As I said above, her profession shouldn't be a difference maker, but in real life it is, and that is exactly why it is a big deal that the President is vulnerable to one.
And of course Mark Felt (his real name) was a disgruntled FBI agent.
Stormy Daniels and the other women filing legal actions strike me as gold diggers, and Trump strikes me as the sort of guy who likes gold diggers. Thus I expect to see more gold diggers. Because that's who our president is. A gold digger guy. I don't see any nobility anywhere in that.
I know how easy and typically pointless it is to call other people idiots, but I suspect there's a good reason that his closest cabinet members reportedly broke protocol and used just those sorts of adjectives for DJT. They might have been narrating, not venting.
No wonder I look fat in all my pictures!
I think Trump was more surprised than anyone that he won. I think he assumed his past would catch up to him and he wouldn’t be elected. It was as astonishing to him as it is to me that evangelicals suddenly proclaimed him the man that God put in place to run the free world. What I have always said is going to bring Trump down is not his women, ( even though the fact that no one cares how many women he sexually harassed is infuriating) but his finances. The money laundering rumors have been rampant since his financial troubles in the 90’s and it appears Mueller has a line on these. Trump may end up wishing he’d never run if that’s all discovered. His main base won’t care and will make excuses ( doesn’t everyone launder money?) but I think enough borderline voters will be disgusted it may make a difference.
