Go back and watch the few games he ended up playing his first year. At Wisconsin comes to mind his freshman year. He came in that game and played over 30 minutes, hit some big shots, shut down Trice for long stretches, and we took a top 10 Wisconsin team to overtime. He barely played before that, he barely played after that. When he has played decent minutes, we've been better, and more competitive, with all 5 of his rosters. Its a fact. That is supported by metrics. That is supported by eye test. I'm NOT saying he should have started all 5 years. Or played 30 minutes per game all 5 years. But there are countless games like that game his freshman year, that say he should have been a main rotation guy the entire time.
DESPITE all the very valid shortcomings he has. You can argue all you want if IU basketball should have guys like him contributing/starting, whatever. I don't think there are any valid arguments against him being a main rotation guy, for the actual teams, with the coaching staffs, he actually had while at IU. And this is basically the first year, in his career, that he's earned, been given, however it happened, regular time as one of the main rotation guards. Shocking that he's being talked about as an All B10 defensive team type player...that his defensive metrics are elite nationally, and the best in the B10 for guards...that our offense became more efficient...
You can focus on Leal being the reason we're 19-13, and probably missing the tournament...orrr, you can focus on the rest of the roster, and the coaching staff. I'm choosing the latter. Because that makes much more sense to me.