How ‘bout just running the ball more, even down 21-7? When IU ran the ball, they at least weren’t losing big chunks of yards like on sacks of KR, giving us no chance. Getting 3-5 yards per carry > negative sack yards. Between Rourke’s sack yards and Evans’ minus 20 or so, that had to be at least minus 50, right?For a moment I thought maybe that might be the better option in this game. Frankly, I just think if we had had a veteran duel threat QB, instead of Rourke, that would make us less vulnerable on offense. OSU and Michigan made us look one dimensional and the defense won the Michigan game and would’ve given us a punchers chance in this one if our special teams hadn’t made mistakes. Right now we have a playoff level defense, but not offense.
What pisses me off is that our offensive coaches did not seem to try any trickery whatsoever. The formations seemed routine and predictable. Our play-calling looked like they were content to just beat their heads against the wall.Even with that poor protection, if Evans catches the snap at end of first half, then doesn’t have a shitty punt to start the 2nd half with shitty coverage for a return Td, it’s a 14-7 game. IU could then run the ball. IU D has played well. Only gave up 14 so far. Way to go punt team!!
Still a great year. If we beat PU and I hope we stomp on them, really make them suffer then we will have 11 wins. Who would have thought we would have this many wins in one season? I am very optimistic.Just no protection for the QB.
Wow Margaret.I just wish someone would literally kick the living shit out of Day for running up the score on that last possession there! Basically a **** you to all of us IU fans! If WW3 were started, I hope ground zero is the Shoe!
Punt return for touchhdown 0 yard drive. Blocked punt less than 5 yard drive.Ohio State only had 316 yards of offense. The defense wasn’t the problem.