ADVERTISEMENT

Unintelligent, soft, lazy, and poorly coached.

Top 25? 2nd in the Big Ten? My @ss…
I’m confused. Beat the spread by a lot. Shot 52%, 47% from 3, over 80% at the line. Outrebounded them and 11 turnovers. Very physical game but I’m not exactly sure what we’re complaining about. I guess maybe not putting them away when we had the chance, but I liked much of what I saw.
 
Last edited:
Top 25? 2nd in the Big Ten? My @ss…
I’ve been highly critical of IU and I’m doubtful Woody is the guy. However, I’m not disappointed in IU’s play vs SC. Biggest criticism was lack of defending the 3 which is Woody’s calling card. Otherwise I thought they played fairly well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: birdforbogey
I’m confused. Beat the spread by a lot. Shot 52%, 47% from 3, over 80% at the line. Outrebounded them and 11 turnovers. Very physical game but I’m not exactly sure what we’re complaining about. I guess maybe not putting them away when we had the chance, but I liked much of what I saw.
Gotta agree. Pretty good game overall. No need to pick this one apart.

Balanced scoring. Ballo was very active down low. Got up and down. Hit shots. Didn't force too much.

There were miscues still but a pretty good win and SC had a lot of size and talent. Pringle was exceptional in the tourney last year, for example.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT