Agreed.Welp, Alabama is out.
Agreed.Welp, Alabama is out.
Right, wrong or indifferent, they won't devalue the conf championships. It's meant to be a reward. Yes, in a 4 team playoff, it's almost a requirement to be a conf champion so it's more of a benefit than not. But with 12 teams, they need to be careful punishing teams or else conferences will find it more worthwhile to eliminate the games.Yeah I think both SMU and Clemson, in.
Right, wrong or indifferent, they won't devalue the conf championships. It's meant to be a reward. Yes, in a 4 team playoff, it's almost a requirement to be a conf champion so it's more of a benefit than not. But with 12 teams, they need to be careful.
If this holds true, who had IU in the play-offs and Alabama out at the start of the season?This format is definitely wonky. If the current results hold...
1. Oregon
2. Georgia
3. Boise St
4. Arizona St
5. Texas
6. Penn State
7. Notre Dame
8. Ohio St
9. Tennessee
10. SMU
11. Indiana
12. Clemson
This is my interpretation based on what the committee has said.
Yes, many people painting this is an option of ‘Bama and SMU. Hopefully the committee doesn’t decide to avoid making that choice and drop another team.Yeah but they're playing a 13th game. You can't punish teams for making a conf championship. If IU had the tie breaker vs Penn State and we're playing in the B1G title game, we would still be ranked #9 and of we lost to Oregon, we would need to fall out? They can't set that precedent.
I had a 7 leg CFP parlay on FanDuel i did at the beginning of the season.If this holds true, who had IU in the play-offs and Alabama out at the start of the season?
This committee and ESPN will totally screw SMU and put in Bama. They’ve been angling, turning themselves in knots, for this in recent weeks. Too bad, earlier in the season South Carolina, blew their game, late against Bama, and the refs stole the LSU game from them. That would’ve done it for Bama. They’ve looked bad the last month. Should not be in over SMU. Will be pleasantly shocked if the Tide get left out.I have to imagine that they wouldn’t say otherwise to build intrigue and get eye balls on the final release. Although, I can see them screwing this up and letting in Bama.
+240 for Bama, -330 for SMU.This committee and ESPN will totally screw SMU and put in Bama. I’ve been angling for that in recent weeks. Too bad, earlier in the season South Carolina, blew their game, late against Bama, and the refs stole the LSU game from them. That would’ve done it for Bama. They’ve looked bad the last month. Should not be in over SMU.
I hope whoever gets Bama (ND, OSU, Penn St) absolutely destroys them. Easier said than done, but stop Milroe running, and the game over. Womack’s d has not been good either.
The committee won't. Ward Manual said yesterday again that teams that aren't playing, won't pass each other. He gave the example of ND and OSU. Their seeds can fluctuate based on outcomes of the conf championshipships but in no instance would ND fall below OSU since both are idle.Yes, many people painting this is an option of ‘Bama and SMU. Hopefully the committee doesn’t decide to avoid making that choice and drop another team.