And people don't think we have a 3rd world justice system.
Tucker Carlson 1/6 tapes
- Thread starter DANC
- Start date
It doesn't matter one iota what you 'think'.
It's basic rights for a defendant to have access to any pertinent information.
Who gives a shit what you 'think' - that's not what the justice system is based on, thank God.
Read the news (outside of your propaganda).
which part don't you believe?
You don't think that anyone getting to bring up a vote for mccarthy's removal gives more power to MTG and her cohorts given they can easily take McCarthy's slim majority and turn it into a minority if they don't get their way.
How many concessions did mccarthy take begrudgingly to become speaker? It was pretty obvious he didn't want to give up his power but had to in order to win the prize.
And who had the gavel when mccarthy didn't make it? Oh right, MTG. the gazpacho queen was selected due to her intelligence and qualifications I am sure
Last edited:
You sure do a helluva lot of I don't think in your posts
Did the J6 defendants ask for access to the video? Were they denied access? I really don't know.
Like so many anti-trump conspiracy theories and narratives (Covid lab leak, Russian stooge, Hunter lap top) the January 6 narrative is crumbling.
You don’t have to agree with Mr Carlson’s interpretation of the videos, to conclude that the Democrats in leadership, for their own part, have cherry-picked, hyped, spun, and in some ways appear to have lied about, aspects of January 6, turning a tragedy for the nation into a politicized talking point aimed at discrediting half of our electorate.
Wolf‘s Sicknick comment is especially poignant. Without that Democratic dishonesty, the whole ”deadly insurrection” narrative falls apart. 
Dear Conservatives, I Apologize
My "Team" was Taken in By Full-Spectrum Propaganda
naomiwolf.substack.com
Trump provides ample reason to criticize him without lying or hyping stuff. The Democrats and the media could not get that. Instead, they misuse and damage the credibility of government and media to thwart him. Perversely, I think all that effort is counter-productive as Trump support has become more stubborn than ever.
Yes, I don’t think that. All members have equal standing, not just a cabal like before.
No, the "narrative" isn't crumbling, but I'm not sure the same can be said for your cognitive function. With all due respect, you are utterly and pathetically full of shit. You're just another ignorant Fox News viewer who's being played for a sucker by Murdoch and company.
Here are the facts. You won't read this, but someone else might.
26 Months Since the Jan. 6 Attack on the Capitol
www.justice.gov
Are you willfully ignorant or does it come naturally to you? MTG's ownership of McCarthy has been widely reported. Here's an article about "I will never leave that woman" from a source that's more your speed - - the New York Post.
I haven't seen any denials by McCarthy regarding the statement ("I will never leave that woman") that's been attributed to him. Neither have you. And you won't, because good ol' Kevin knows which side his bread is buttered on.
It took fifteen (15) ballots and four days for McCarthy to be elected Speaker. Marjorie Taylor Greene is the reason he ultimately got the gavel. She owns him now.
Kevin McCarthy vows to ‘always take care of’ Marjorie Taylor Greene: report
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy has been effusive in his praise of firebrand Rep. Marjorie Taylor Green behind closed doors.
nypost.com
Greene: If McCarthy wants to make base happy, he’ll ‘give me a lot of power’
Firebrand Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) warned that the Republican base would be “very unhappy” if House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) does not give her more power if Republicans …
thehill.com
I think you wanna have sex with MTG.Are you willfully ignorant or does it come naturally to you? MTG's ownership of McCarthy has been widely reported. Here's an article about "I will never leave that woman" from a source that's more your speed - - the New York Post.
I haven't seen any denials by McCarthy regarding the statement ("I will never leave that woman") that's been attributed to him. Neither have you. And you won't, because good ol' Kevin knows which side his bread is buttered on.
It took fifteen (15) ballots and four days for McCarthy to be elected Speaker. Marjorie Taylor Greene is the reason he ultimately got the gavel. She owns him now.
Kevin McCarthy vows to ‘always take care of’ Marjorie Taylor Greene: report
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy has been effusive in his praise of firebrand Rep. Marjorie Taylor Green behind closed doors.
Greene: If McCarthy wants to make base happy, he’ll ‘give me a lot of power’
Firebrand Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) warned that the Republican base would be “very unhappy” if House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) does not give her more power if Republicans …
Stay in the game here.No, the "narrative" isn't crumbling, but I'm not sure the same can be said for your cognitive function. With all due respect, you are utterly and pathetically full of shit. You're just another ignorant Fox News viewer who's being played for a sucker by Murdoch and company.
Here are the facts. You won't read this, but someone else might.
26 Months Since the Jan. 6 Attack on the Capitol
I’m talking about the select committee , not the DOJ. You probably don’t know the difference, so quit wasting my time.
How can you ask for something you don't know exists?
You're talking in circles.
The Jan 6 Committee hearings, including the testimony provided, were entirely consistent with the Justice report I linked.
As for your other nutty post, I'm not going to dignify that with a response. You're off your rocker.
That's not the question. If the J6 defendants thought there was exculpatory or mitigating evidence in the Capitol security surveillance tapes, why didn't they ask for them as part of discovery? Or they did, and they were denied?
Why should they have been, particularly since the Capitol police have legitimate security concerns.
Why didn't Carlson show more than four minutes? What was exculpatory in any of it?
Well, one of them just asked for either a retrial or mistrial - can't remember which - because of new video that was released that they didn't have access to.
So, I guess in that case, we can assume they didn't know about it or or were denied access to it.
You could assume that, but I'm not sure the request has any merit or will be upheld.
He has no clue. He's just doing what always does - - deflect, obfuscate, present fallacious arguments, etc.
Prosecutors have an obligation to provide exculpatory evidence to defendants, irrespective of any request. Here, there are two issues - - what evidence, if any, is exculpatory, and who was in possession of it. Were the individual prosecutors/US Attorney's offices even in possession of all, most or any of the video? They don't have an obligation to provide what they don't have.
Last edited:
You really should get your facts straight before you expect anyone to respond to your
I'll help you out here, although you don't deserve it.
Someone posted here yesterday a social media post that purported to show the cover page of a Brady motion filed by an attorney on behalf of one of the January 6 defendants. It was basically just the caption, with no argument. Who knows whether it was even legit.
In any event, just because a motion is filed doesn't mean there's any merit to the argument. So, no, we can't assume anything. We can't assume the prosecution held anything back that was exculpatory, or that the prosecution was in possession of any exculpatory evidence.
What if he identifies as BLM or Antifa and is raising a trans kid from his neighbors wife? <--- there would be a statue erected for this mostly peaceful person.
The shaman's lawyer made it sound like he asked for any video DOJ had in which his client appeared. However, just because the video exists doesn't mean DOJ had it. The prosecutor's job is to turn over any relevant evidence it has, including exculpatory evidence. The prosecutor's job is not to go out of its way to find exculpatory evidence for the defense. They (the defense) had access to the tapes, it was their job to search through them.
That said, I don't see how any of this is exculpatory, anyway. Whether or not he spent part of his time peacefully walking around the Capitol is irrelevant. He was charged for what he did, not what he didn't do.
Here is the governments discovery duties. The obligation is not limited to what is in the DOJ‘s or USA’s custody. The closest question I think comes under (1)(E)(I).
Government’s Disclosure.
(1) Information Subject to Disclosure.
(A) Defendant’s Oral Statement. Upon a defendant’s request, the government must disclose to the defendant the substance of any relevant oral statement made by the defendant, before or after arrest, in response to interrogation by a person the defendant knew was a government agent if the government intends to use the statement at trial.
(B) Defendant’s Written or Recorded Statement. Upon a defendant’s request, the government must disclose to the defendant, and make available for inspection, copying, or photographing, all of the following:
(i) any relevant written or recorded statement by the defendant if:
· the statement is within the government’s possession, custody, or control; and
· the attorney for the government knows-or through due diligence could know-that the statement exists;
(ii) the portion of any written record containing the substance of any relevant oral statement made before or after arrest if the defendant made the statement in response to interrogation by a person the defendant knew was a government agent; and
(iii) the defendant’s recorded testimony before a grand jury relating to the charged offense.
(C) Organizational Defendant. Upon a defendant’s request, if the defendant is an organization, the government must disclose to the defendant any statement described in Rule 16(a)(1)(A) and (B) if the government contends that the person making the statement:
(i) was legally able to bind the defendant regarding the subject of the statement because of that person’s position as the defendant’s director, officer, employee, or agent; or
(ii) was personally involved in the alleged conduct constituting the offense and was legally able to bind the defendant regarding that conduct because of that person’s position as the defendant’s director, officer, employee, or agent.
(D) Defendant’s Prior Record. Upon a defendant’s request, the government must furnish the defendant with a copy of the defendant’s prior criminal record that is within the government’s possession, custody, or control if the attorney for the government knows-or through due diligence could know-that the record exists.
(E) Documents and Objects. Upon a defendant’s request, the government must permit the defendant to inspect and to copy or photograph books, papers, documents, data, photographs, tangible objects, buildings or places, or copies or portions of any of these items, if the item is within the government’s possession, custody, or control and:
(i) the item is material to preparing the defense;
(ii) the government intends to use the item in its case-in-chief at trial; or
(iii) the item was obtained from or belongs to the defendant.
You went to school to learn how to read that - I didn't.
Are you kidding? We don’t read that shit, we just go to court and wing it.
I don't think her death was the result of police brutality.
"While initial reports claimed Boyland had been crushed to death amongst the crowds at the Capitol, the DC medical examiner ultimately ruled her cause of death was an amphetamine overdose."
CNN's Facts First searchable database - CNN
Search CNN’s Facts First database for fact checks related to the U.S. economy, mail-in voting, coronavirus, police reform and more.
www.cnn.com
Of course, it's a CCN site, so who knows.
Yes, per the DC medical examiner.
Per the Gateway Pundit, the Epoch Times and other fvcked up outlets, she died as a result of police brutality.
Fact Check: Is There 'New Footage' Showing Police Beat Rosanne Boyland?
A new viral video claims to contain "new graphic" footage of the incident during the January 6 Capitol insurrection as the rioter lay unconscious on the ground.
www.newsweek.com
Trump sucks. So does Tucker Carlson. So does everyone who continues to lie about the Nov 2020 election and January 6.
26 Months Since the Jan. 6 Attack on the Capitol
www.justice.gov
Dude go get a freaking beer. Make it a few double ipa's. January 6th...nobody gives a crap. The only reason it comes up amongst my crew is when the ridiculous left runs its clownshow on TV about it and we're like why??? It's BS Bowl. A nothing burger. Now take my advice and get some good double IPA. If you're lucky you can find one of the OGs that was shelved for years and recently appeared. Stone Ruination. Go get after it and get right. Have a great day! Go HoosiersTrump sucks. So does Tucker Carlson. So does everyone who continues to lie about the Nov 2020 election and January 6.
26 Months Since the Jan. 6 Attack on the Capitol
If you people think Jan 6 was an insurrection then you have no idea what one is or what that word even means. That was child's play. You better hope a real one doesn't pop off. It would make the Bosnia-Kosovo war look like recess.
Cops committing suicide after the fact does not mean it was related to the event. If that's even true they did. People who commit suicide have long held thoughts about it. I'm sure those thoughts predated jan 6.
Cops committing suicide after the fact does not mean it was related to the event. If that's even true they did. People who commit suicide have long held thoughts about it. I'm sure those thoughts predated jan 6.
Tell that to the people that got injured on jan 6 or family members of the people that were killed
Nothing burger? Yeah right
Latest posts
-
Can government policy end, or significantly decrease, childhood trauma?- Latest: Baller23Boogie
-
-
-
