ADVERTISEMENT

top 4: 1) Beard. 2) Iowa State. 3) May. 4) Collins. what say u

Bucky would be FUN! Dusty is in the process of cleansing some big doubts I have on him. A top 2-3 finish in the B10, and post season success, would make me a lot more comfortable. His resume, outside the Final Four run year, is very pedestrian. But his start at Michigan has been very good. I would still worry, though, that we're getting a more normal, IU guy, version of Crean.
The better Dusty does, the more comfortable we get with the hire, but the harder he probably gets to hire. A tricky one.
 
We say that every coaching cycle. Whether it be Donovan or Stevens or whoever this fan base always talks themselves into thinking we're hiring a proven, elite coach. And then it never happens. How disappointed were people when they hired Crean after names like Calipari, Few, and Bennett were floated? Or when they hired Archie after all the talk of Billy Donovan coming? Woodson when Stevens turned down the job?
Yep...so lets have a few guys like Ben McCollum or Pat Kelsey vetted and ready to act on...for when Stevens, Pearl, Beard, etc... don't materialize. Outside Sampson, who doesn't apply to any of this... Archie is the only one that I think would have been seen as a very good basketball coach, when we hired them. Tells me we didn't have any sort of list or approach that included really good, proven, lower level basketball coaches waiting in the wings.

When they actually hire a good basketball coach, no matter what you think our "crazy fan base" will get in their heads...when we see good basketball on the court, we'll be excited about it. We haven't seen it, in a LONG time. Cody/Vic days, I'd say. And even with them, Crean's manic side caused many of us to "side eye" he and his program. But those couple of teams are still up there with my favorite IU teams ever.
 
The better Dusty does, the more comfortable we get with the hire, but the harder he probably gets to hire. A tricky one.

I just find it hard to believe that he'd leave Michigan after one (so far, successful) season to come to IU. I mean, maybe he would, but more likely this is just IU fans over-valuing the allure of coaching here. But I don't know.
 
I just find it hard to believe that he'd leave Michigan after one (so far, successful) season to come to IU. I mean, maybe he would, but more likely this is just IU fans over-valuing the allure of coaching here. But I don't know.
There are a lot of tangible reasons why IU would be a more attractive long term job, for anyone, than Michigan.

More NIL money, seemingly.
Easier transfer rules
Better historic name (this one could go both ways, but might matter to some)

And for May...his time at IU under RMK, one would have to imagine, created a fairly strong connection for him with the town, buildings, program, etc...
 
Hate to say it...but this fantasy thought process on the next coach is keeping me engaged with the "team" and program right now.

Nothing I'm seeing on the court is keeping me engaged. We have 1 recruit signed for next year. What the heck else, positive, is there to talk about? The thought of Stevens..."tis a pleasant fiction"...to quote one of he greatest movies ever. So why not discuss it?

The reality, most likely, is that our next coach isn't one of the "name" guys many have thrown out. And that's o.k. I'm a pretty big college basketball fan, and I'd never heard of Pat Kelsey until he beat our ass this year in Bahamas. If Dolson is allowed to do his job, I have optimism he'll find someone of equal caliber. And its possible many of us have never really heard of, or paid attention to him. There are almost 400 Division 1 men's basketball teams. I suspect the next coach will come from that particular pool. And, most likely, he will be better than our current coach.
no worries, I get it. Like I said, it's therapy for many. Seems to have opposite effect on me now. Bad mojo deja vu.

if season goes south, could be a real ugly power struggle coming. But a bloodletting will be needed, so remove the gloves and see who wins.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EvansvilleHoosier88
We say that every coaching cycle. Whether it be Donovan or Stevens or whoever this fan base always talks themselves into thinking we're hiring a proven, elite coach. And then it never happens. How disappointed were people when they hired Crean after names like Calipari, Few, and Bennett were floated? Or when they hired Archie after all the talk of Billy Donovan coming? Woodson when Stevens turned down the job?
wait, we didn't hire Billy after all?? Damn you Fepaugh.....
 
I just find it hard to believe that he'd leave Michigan after one (so far, successful) season to come to IU. I mean, maybe he would, but more likely this is just IU fans over-valuing the allure of coaching here. But I don't know.
Michigan agreed to a ridiculously low buyout for a reason.
 
no worries, I get it. Like I said, it's therapy for many. Seem

no worries, I get it. Like I said, it's therapy for many. Seems to have opposite effect on me now. Bad mojo deja vu.

if season goes south, could be a real ugly power struggle coming. But a bloodletting will be needed, so remove the gloves and see who wins.
I’m feeling good about Scott winning the power struggle. His FB moves are bringing in tens of millions of extra dollars to IU and showcasing the entire school. If it is true he wanted Woody gone last year he was right about that too. He’s the only guy delivering serious results in the world of influential people around IUBB.

Maybe Scott messes up this bball hire, idk, but he’s our best shot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IUgradman
Lay out your case that Beard "beats women". What most people's opinions are, is not really relevant. A DV issue, especially one where a teenage daughter is involved, as I believe she was that night, is a highly emotionally charged incident. So far as I know, that's the only time that's ever been even suggested as a problem. An investigator could tell you that in a day easily. If she dropped it, and they've resovled it, I don't see why it would be an issue, and think it would be wrong to allow it to be. If he has any history of "beating women" he'll have had police called on him numerous times and would have charges and restraining orders, etc... and then I'd agree, it's a disqualifier.
There's a lot more red flags than the DV allegations in regards to Beard on top of just being a very bad cultural fit at a midwest school.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tbird2017
I’m feeling good about Scott winning the power struggle. His FB moves are bringing in tens of millions of extra dollars to IU and showcasing the entire school. If it is true he wanted Woody gone last year he was right about that too. He’s the only guy delivering serious results in the world of influential people around IUBB.

Maybe Scott messes up this bball hire, idk, but he’s our best shot.
yep fball success has given him some leverage, you would hope. Quinn played his card last year...he owns this bball season win or lose.
 
So that means the coaching search cant start until after July 1st? That will suck.
I think as a lame duck he has a lot less leverage. He could try to stop things, but it’s not worth it, he would be delaying the inevitable and making everything worse. He got his way for four years it’s done.
 
I think as a lame duck he has a lot less leverage. He could try to stop things, but it’s not worth it, he would be delaying the inevitable and making everything worse. He got his way for four years it’s done.
My main concern is Buckner was basically just a "plant"...and the people that planted him are still very much in control.

I think even if that is true, if the season keeps going like it looks and feels like it will, Woodson will be let go. But I fear whoever planted Buckner, will continue to hold a grip over the process and the replacement choices.
 
My main concern is Buckner was basically just a "plant"...and the people that planted him are still very much in control.

I think even if that is true, if the season keeps going like it looks and feels like it will, Woodson will be let go. But I fear whoever planted Buckner, will continue to hold a grip over the process and the replacement choices.
He's definitely not a plant. It's not uncommon at all for former athletes to serve as trustees. He still cares deeply for IU despite being loyal to his friend. He does not have absolute power the way some think he does.
 
My main concern is Buckner was basically just a "plant"...and the people that planted him are still very much in control.

I think even if that is true, if the season keeps going like it looks and feels like it will, Woodson will be let go. But I fear whoever planted Buckner, will continue to hold a grip over the process and the replacement choices.
Pence appointed him, then I think the BoT picks the Chairman.
 
He's definitely not a plant. It's not uncommon at all for former athletes to serve as trustees. He still cares deeply for IU despite being loyal to his friend. He does not have absolute power the way some think he does.
Pence appointed him, then I think the BoT picks the Chairman.
Thanks for the clarification...no need for the worries there then, evidently. I had no idea how it came to be that he was both on the BOT, and then the Chairman.

I guess there may still be concern with big donor influences...but as Tammany has pointed out a few times now...one would have to think the goings on in the last 12 months or so, have given Dolson quite a lot more power and influence "in the room". Hopefully to the point where there isn't really a room any more, or that Dolson is the only one in it.
 
Thanks for the clarification...no need for the worries there then, evidently. I had no idea how it came to be that he was both on the BOT, and then the Chairman.

I guess there may still be concern with big donor influences...but as Tammany has pointed out a few times now...one would have to think the goings on in the last 12 months or so, have given Dolson quite a lot more power and influence "in the room". Hopefully to the point where there isn't really a room any more, or that Dolson is the only one in it.
It was the optics of firing Woodson after three seasons.
 
It was the optics of firing Woodson after three seasons.
Interesting, if true. I can see the merits of that. As I can see them for not doing anything mid season this year, no matter how bad it gets.

Honestly hope he doesn't test that with a big losing streak. Its better for everyone, in my opinion, if he finishes the season relatively well, and is let go at seasons end.
 
I don't need to lay out anything. I don't know the facts and neither do you. The point is that the facts don't matter here. This isn't a court of law. Only the narrative matters. And "a guy who beats women" would be the narrative. IU wouldn't want that.
Plus his offense is generally boring AF. After watching Miller and Woodson, the last thing we need is another boring ass offense.
 
The optics have improved so much.
Yeah, firing/forcing out Woodson at the conclusion of this season, assuming we're headed to where everyone thinks we're headed, is more than justification at this point. But three years would have been an awful quick trigger, especially after making the tournament his first two seasons.
 
Interesting, if true. I can see the merits of that. As I can see them for not doing anything mid season this year, no matter how bad it gets.

Honestly hope he doesn't test that with a big losing streak. Its better for everyone, in my opinion, if he finishes the season relatively well, and is let go at seasons end.
Tomorrow will be a telling sign. Students are back and this will be the biggest game of the year by far. Come out flat and uninspired, wheels could come off quick.
 
Yeah, firing/forcing out Woodson at the conclusion of this season, assuming we're headed to where everyone thinks we're headed, is more than justification at this point. But three years would have been an awful quick trigger, especially after making the tournament his first two seasons.
Despite never enjoying watching Woodson's teams, I think I even advocated that Dolson better have a really, really good, no brainer level replacement in place to make a move last year.
 
Tomorrow will be a telling sign. Students are back and this will be the biggest game of the year by far. Come out flat and uninspired, wheels could come off quick.
Outside the first Illinois game in Woodson's IU coaching career, his teams have faired pretty well against Illinois.

I would suspect a decent performance for much of the game. A win will be a pleasant surprise, but I bet it ends up being a pretty competitive game. Illinois does have some very dangerous, and explosive perimeter players, so shooting us out of the gym could happen too.

As you say, it'll be a telling sign on Woodson's abilities to right the ship.
 
I'm confused re #2....are we going after the entire Iowa State staff, and team?
If the guy is your number 2, do a little diligence and post his name (Otlezburger).

Honestly we need to stop this message board coaching search, for now. Like it or not, the team has a present record that would never lend to a firing midseason. No team fires their coach while the squad is sitting at 13-4 / 4-2. Yeah we got rolled in Iowa City, yeah we've had a soft schedule and record is a little misleading. Yes we tend to play, at many times, like a jumbled mess of high-paid/half-interested talent. And yes, there are probably more 20+ losses coming and the remaining B1G schedule is the toughest in the league. But....just have to let this season play out and see how it ends. Then evaluate program future and best options. The medicine tastes like shit, but we just have to swallow it until March. Then...we'll see where IU basketball is at.
We got rolled in all 4 losses.
 
just the sarcasm you displayed regarding Iowa State. I think it was pretty obvious my intent.
sorry it was Monday am and I hadn't had my first full cup of coffee yet.
They actually have a good program rolling out there...would be tough to pull him to IU. I watched them some the other day, they play well and with urgency. Something I see IU lacking in almost every game.
 
You do know that nothing we discuss on here has an impact on what happens in the athletic department? Frankly, I like having discussions now about potential replacements for a coach that we know isn’t the long term solution. I have seen multiple coaches I was either completely unaware of or lacking awareness to their track record. I have begun to keep tabs on to stay better informed. We spend all summer talking hypotheticals for the upcoming season, we spend 12 months talking hypotheticals for a potential recruit, and I see nothing wrong with discussing hypotheticals for a change that seems imminent that regardless of the record. QB will have to choose between his own future and Woody’s because he is up for reelection in a few months and has somehow made himself public enemy #1 (well maybe #2)
Ah, a discussion about having discussions about possible new coaches. Whenever it is decided to fire Woodson, I hope they have a behind the scene deal already worked out with a “can’t miss” coach. If not, there are good years for coaching hires and there are bad years. Don’t fire Woodson when the possibilities for greatness are slim picking. We’ve had five consecutive bad coaching hires such that 80% of our discussions here are regarding possible new coaches. The IU coaching merry-go-round is making me dizzy and I think I’m going to puke.

Speaking of PUke, our nemesis has had 1 coaching change in the last 45 years and still counting. “Porkchop” is putting up Knight-like numbers in consistently and one of these years he very well may get them a legitimate banner to hang.
 
I could see it if we lose...say our next 10-11 games or so...and somehow that guarantees we'll finish in the bottom 5 in the conference. That would mean no NCAA, AND no B10 tournament. If that would happen, and we have multiple weeks left in the season, I could see it happening...to give Dolson a "head start" over other P4 schools that would be planning on getting rid of their coaches.

But, I agree, its not likely to happen until seasons end. And unless the power structure has changed, it may not happen at all. The dynamic that's a little different this year, though, is Woodson would probably need to get some sort of extension at this years end, if he isn't let go. And I just can't fathom that happening if he misses out on the NCAA's, with this roster.
Of course he won’t be cut loose until the end of the season. But we should definitely be using back channels to gauge interest from coaches who we would want to interview (McCollum?). This might be my #1 candidate.
 
Yeah...maybe that winning percentage isn't actually a good one in the NBA either. Seems like solidly playoff team, most years though. And for most franchises, that's good enough. I think IU is far enough removed from elite status, that we probably shouldn't consider ourselves as "Kansas like", or "Duke like"... which would be Lakers/Celtics like...
We're basically the Portland Trailblazers of the NCAA... Several banners about 40=50 years ago.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT