Tina Peters - bubbye
- Thread starter Noodle
- Start date
Your first sentence is just flat out wrong, which makes the rest of your screed moot.
What was in it for her? Of course it was a matter of conscience. The woman is an upstanding citizen and was doing what she thought was right.
What was the harm done - if it's so obvious, why don't you tell what it is?
Correct. Hunter could have killed many people. What Peters did is a victimless crime if a crime at all.
This kinda reminds me of the Pete Rose discussion. She did something that affected the integrity of the game, DANC. Can't do that kinda stuff.
Her BS excuses didn't fly in court in front of a jury of her peers and they won't fly here. There was no evidence that there was election voter fraud AND it's not her job to sneak around trying to find something that doesn't exist. You're hopeless.
She's a convicted felon. You have a weird definition of "upstanding citizen."
Tons of hookers are killed by drug overdoses every year. He gave them lots of drugs.
Trumpism has made all these people stupid beyond reconciliation.
It's something that deserves a ton of research. Were these people stupid before they went all in on Trumpism or does Trumpism cause them to be stupid. Either way, they're unbelievably stupid about way too many things.
Good question. I think DANC was always stupid, but my recollection is that dbm used to be smart. But I could also be remembering wrong.
If Trump doesn't win you're going to put Vance on trial for stealing that calculator. We know. Death penalty.
Is that it. Here I thought the water cooler book club was the problem.
No, the rest of the book club is doing fine; you're the only one who turned stupid.
She cost Mesa County over a million bucks, which is a lot of money out there. Thev Republican county commissioners testified to that.
The Republican executive of the clerks association testified about the harm caused to the perception of Colorado’s gold-standard voting system.
You tell us. You can't make a point just by asking a random question out of the blue.
Well, OK, at least you can't make the brilliant point you thought you were making. Instead, your questions tell us all about you -- not the result you were dreaming of.
The sad part is he thinks he sounds clever when he clicks "post."
She was convicted of "three felony counts of attempting to influence a public servant, one felony count of conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation, one misdemeanor count of official misconduct, one misdemeanor count of violation of duty in elections, and one misdemeanor count of failure to comply with the secretary of state."
Tina Peters, former Mesa County clerk, sentenced to 9 years in prison over voting systems breach • Colorado Newsline
Judge Matthew Barrett cited Peters’ lack of remorse, and the fact she has “remained quite defiant” during his remarks before announcing the sentence.
coloradonewsline.com
Isn't that enough for a law-abiding Republican like you?
Last edited:
And as I understand it, it was a state court Arizona jury. None of those deep state federal juries for her.
If I'm right, Trump can't pardon her either -- even for just burping at the dinner table at the next MAGA fundraiser.
Yep. Convicted in state court. Trump could not pardon her.
She was convicted of "three felony counts of attempting to influence a public servant, one felony count of conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation, one misdemeanor count of official misconduct, one misdemeanor count of violation of duty in elections, and one misdemeanor count of failure to comply with the secretary of state."
Tina Peters, former Mesa County clerk, sentenced to 9 years in prison over voting systems breach • Colorado Newsline
Judge Matthew Barrett cited Peters’ lack of remorse, and the fact she has “remained quite defiant” during his remarks before announcing the sentence.
coloradonewsline.com
Add them up.
So Accountant Stoll, how many years would you give her?
You may be right, but I doubt his thought process even considers whether he is clever or not. He's on the pseudo dream team -- their goal is just to disrupt, interrupt, shout down and deflect.
He assumes he is brilliant but he really doesn't care if he demonstrates that he is.
Then I stand corrected. Please extend my apologies to all the lawyers on this board.
I don't think Dan is stupid. I may disagree with him on everything outside of Ukraine, but he doesn't bring every possible conspiracy here in blind faith.
Dbm doesn't even try, there is no way he tries to fact check anything he brings.
Don't do that. Lawyers don't deserve apologies.
I guess it depends how you define stupid. DANC demonstrates an inability to stay on topic, to respond intelligibly to posts, to understand the arguments he's responding to. I call that stupid. But maybe it's only because he pretends he's so smart, and so I'm confusing stupidity with arrogance.
He knows exactly what he's doing. His sole purpose in posting here is to sow dissent and stir up shit. He's the very definition of an Internet troll, and he's good at it. Don't take the bait.
