Thats the point -- the scale where its at, I am not sure there is any real solution. Other countries have some semblance of a plan but the situation that the US finds itself, I am not so sure.
Ok, say with your approach -- lets put some meat to it.
How you would you start the operations in terms of an implementation plan? How would you segment the society out? How do you keep the plus 45s corralled in their homesteads? How do you compensate them for it? People currently at work over 45?
Its a consumer-driven society. Stick a large chunk of people into euphemistically put, 'homesteads' will plough it back into the 70s -- unless you create two separate economies and society? Apartheid?
no idea what you're talking about.
seems you're just trolling at this point, and no idea why.
my plan doesn't force anything on anyone, thus doesn't need me to corral anyone, or force anyone out of lockdown or leave them without a safety net.
everyone can choose the universe they wish and need, and switch at will as well.
that is the whole basis of my plan. DUH!
it acknowledges, accepts, and accommodates, our political and economic realities
it also acknowledges the realities of the two universes, (which you refuse to the death to acknowledge or take into account), and the health risks and mindsets of both, and doesn't force either universe into what's best or wanted from the other universe.
you refuse to offer a better plan, that's politically and economically doable, and gives both sides what they want and need, and doesn't force either side on the other.
you're just trolling at this point. (again uncharacteristic).
please don't respond again until you have a better plan to offer, that's politically and economically more doable than mine, still protects the at risks and the safety net, and doesn't force lockdown on the unwilling and un-needing who you can't control forever. (or even for another month).
until such time, i'll assume you accept my plan as the far best of the imperfect.