"The 2024 Election, where Votes have just started being cast, will be under the closes professional scrutiny and WHEN I WIN...
- Thread starter UTFO
- Start date
You are lame. An easy mark.
Me admitting that MS might have bad voting laws doesn’t invalidate the idea that Democrats are ruining the structure of our elections. The preponderance of the evidence is against you,
Law and Order, but only when convenient. Noted. We don't need spies in Iran or China anyway.
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
Your point has merit. When should early voting begin? And should that be determined by the states or the Feds?
Interesting that other civilized countries have 1 day to vote. And with paper ballots. Why? Because they know anything else is major opportunity for fraud.
But we do it over months because.... well, that's how the Democrats want it.
Was Walz here on his honeymoon?They are fine with
'
as long as Trump is calling the shots.
Interesting Wiki left out France, which is the most ethnically diverse of European nations, and had single day voting.Early voting - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
And none of them allow voting as early as we do.
I'd be fine with a few days early voting a couple weeks before the election - not almost 2 months.
There is also a difference between in-person early voting at a voting station versus mail-in ballots and those dropped off by anyone.
You wrote "Interesting that other civilized countries have 1 day to vote." My link proved you are a LIAR. When are you going to stop LYING???
When you stop being an asshole. So, I guess I'll be lying for a loooo-oooong time.You wrote "Interesting that other civilized countries have 1 day to vote." My link proved you are a LIAR. When are you going to stop LYING???
He’s an unrepentant serial liar.You wrote "Interesting that other civilized countries have 1 day to vote." My link proved you are a LIAR. When are you going to stop LYING???
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
Probably using trump's strategy of repeating lies as often as possible to get others to believe it.
Although he probably truly believes his lies
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
Someone had said Trump told them that repeating lies is a good strategy to getting people to believe them.
Trump may believe some of his lies but I bet most of his lies are done knowingly.
Of course impossible to prove and he lies so much that it would be a full time job keeping track.
Last edited by a moderator:
It’s funny because in this day of information lies are very easy to catch. But we also live in a time of lazy citizens who are willing to believe anything their hero tells them. Nit just Trump but most people in general seem to be lapping up all sorts of lies
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
Just going to get worse as photoshopping and altering videos becomes easier so you can fabricate evidence to backup the lie
PSA ...
Currently, the anti-American propaganda cabal of Russia and MAGA, are pushing the stupid ass Haitian pussy eating story. Will Trump follow Putin's propaganda plan in the debate tomorrow and mentioned Haitians eating pussy? We all know that one of the biggest fears of MAGA men are people who can do what they never could ...
Side note: Just how f*cking ate up and stupid do these weirdos have to be to believe such inane shit?
Currently, the anti-American propaganda cabal of Russia and MAGA, are pushing the stupid ass Haitian pussy eating story. Will Trump follow Putin's propaganda plan in the debate tomorrow and mentioned Haitians eating pussy? We all know that one of the biggest fears of MAGA men are people who can do what they never could ...
Side note: Just how f*cking ate up and stupid do these weirdos have to be to believe such inane shit?
She also was not the Border czar. The worst vice president in history who many Democrats wanted to replace on the ticket.
The sound of goalposts moving once again. DUNC is never wrong, he just switches topics.
The exchange between you and HIckory remind me of conversations between my 5 and 3 year old grandkids.
Except they'e on a higher intellectual level.
Here's what I wrote: "Interesting that other civilized countries have 1 day to vote." I never said they all had 1 day to vote.You wrote "Interesting that other civilized countries have 1 day to vote." My link proved you are a LIAR. When are you going to stop LYING???
So, you changed the goal post. What are you going to stop moving the goal posts?
"In Pennsylvania any registered voter can request on-line a mail ballot. Pennsylvania does not have signature verification. All the requirements are by self authentication And everything, except the mail ballot, is online without showing anybody any verification."
I believe you'll find all of these provisions in Act 77 enacted in 2019. Hre is the link...
2019 Act 77
www.legis.state.pa.us
Now correct me if I'm wrong (I'm not) but I believe the Legislature which enacted this bill in 2019 was controlled by The GOP. The act was a compromise between GOP Legislators who wanted to eliminat straight ticket ballots and Dems who wanted to allow for no excuse needed absentee balloting. I don't think the GOP was even that opposed to the concept, since up until that time absentee ballots were largely the purview of the GOP. In fact it was only a year later when Trump started whining that Republicans started to characterize expanding absentee balloting as "evil"...
You know OH,FL and PA all have early mail and in person voting. OH and FL were both able to declare their winner on election night because the early votes were opened and prepped for counting prior to election day. In both states Biden had a lead based on early returns but as election day ballots were tallied Trump ended up winning. Easy Peasy..., no whining about made up shenanigans...
But rather than adopt a similar procedure for processing early votes, PA insists on processing early votes last. Again it's that GOP controlled Legislature mandating that mail/early ballots can't even be opened till election day, and can't be counted till election day ballots are already counted and added in...
Now I wonder who has a vested interest in the continued application of such a policy? Not only was this a concerted effort on Trump's part to pretend to be ahead, but he also unscrupiously tried to use this fake lead as a justification to have a 3am press conference claiming he "won".
Trump knew that if PA's early votes were counted first then operation "red mirage" couldn't be implemented. Simple math tells you that with the amount of early ballots to be counted and Trump discouraging his followers from Early/mail voting that Trump's "lead" was illusionary with record numbers of early votes yet to be tallied. So Trump pressured the GOP Legislators not to modify the procedure to make things more convenient...
It wasn't a huge secret. That's why the Dems were completely prepared with legal teams and experts in every contested state. Hell even I was aware of what Trump was going to try to do. Here's an article from Oct 31 warning about the "red mirage" and explaining what Trump was up to.
'Red mirage': the 'insidious' scenario if Trump declares an early victory
The situation could develop if the president appears to be leading on election night before all votes are counted – and for some officials, it’s too realistic for words
Nice try, but nothing I said is wrong."In Pennsylvania any registered voter can request on-line a mail ballot. Pennsylvania does not have signature verification. All the requirements are by self authentication And everything, except the mail ballot, is online without showing anybody any verification."
I believe you'll find all of these provisions in Act 77 enacted in 2019. Hre is the link...
2019 Act 77
www.legis.state.pa.us
Now correct me if I'm wrong (I'm not) but I believe the Legislature which enacted this bill in 2019 was controlled by The GOP. The act was a compromise between GOP Legislators who wanted to eliminat state ticket ballots and Dems who wanted to allow for no excuse needed absentee balloting. I don't think the GOP was even that opposed to the concept, till up until that time absentee ballots were largely the purview of the GOP. In fact it was only a year later when Trump started whining that Republicans started to characterize expanding absentee ballots as "evil"...
You know OH,FL and PA all have early mail and in person voting. OH and FL were both able to declare their winner on election night because the early votes were opened and prepped for counting prior to election day. n both states Biden had a lead based on early returns but as election day ballots were tallied Trump ended up winning. Easy Peasy...
But rather than adopt a similar procedure for processing early votes, PA insists on processing early votes last. Again it's that GOP controlled Legislature mandating that mail/early ballots can't even be opened till election day, and can't be counted till election day ballots are already counted and added in...
Now I wonder who has a vested interest in the continued application of such a policy? Not only was this a concerted effort on Trump's part to pretend to be ahead, but he also unscrupiously tried to use this fake lead as a justification to have a 3am press conference claiming he "won".
Trump knew that if PA's early votes were counted first then operation "red mirage" couldn't be implemented. Simple math tells you that with the amount of early ballots to be counted and Trump discouraging his followers from Early/mail voting that Trump's "lead" was illusionary with record numbers of early votes yet to be tallied. So Trump pressured the GOP Legislators not to modify the procedure to make things more convenient...
It wasn't a huge secret. That's why the Dems were completely prepared with legal teams and experts in every contested state. Hell even I was aware of what Trump was going to try to do. Here's an article from Oct 31 warning about the "red mirage" and explaining what Trump was up to.
'Red mirage': the 'insidious' scenario if Trump declares an early victory
The situation could develop if the president appears to be leading on election night before all votes are counted – and for some officials, it’s too realistic for wordswww.theguardian.com
"Interesting Wiki left out France, which is the most ethnically diverse of European nations, and had single day voting.
And none of them allow voting as early as we do."
France had two seperate election weekends, nothing close to single day voting. The whole reason Macron was able to fashion a coaltion to keep the neo-Nazi nutters out, was because normal people were apalled at the amount of first weekend support the Fascists were able to garner.
I didn't say it was wrong. Just pointing out that anything approved by the Legislature (and signed by Shapiro or his predecessor Wolf) actually was passed by a GOP controlled Legislature...
It's MAGA who wants to make it as difficult as possible for people to exercise their right to vote...That's the tactic you are forced to resort to when you're a minority with unpopular opinions.
She did support defunding Baileyiu if you would like to look up information.
I have and she did not support defunding police.
From ChatGPT:
Kamala Harris has not explicitly supported "defunding the police." In fact, during her vice presidential campaign in 2020, Harris consistently emphasized her opposition to the idea of defunding law enforcement. However, her stance has focused more on reforming the police rather than reducing or eliminating funding.
Here are some key points on the matter:
### Public Statements
1. **Interview with ABC’s *Good Morning America* (June 2020)**:
- Kamala Harris clarified that she does **not support defunding the police**, stating:
> “I think that a big part of this conversation really is about reimagining how we do public safety in America, which I support... We have confused the idea that to achieve safety, you put more cops on the street instead of understanding to achieve safe and healthy communities, you put more resources into public education, affordable housing, homeownership, job creation.”
- This statement emphasizes her support for *reallocating* some resources from police budgets to community programs that address underlying causes of crime.
2. **2020 Democratic National Convention Speech**:
- Harris supported a call for police reform, including a ban on chokeholds, racial profiling, and the establishment of national standards for police use of force, but she made no mention of defunding law enforcement agencies.
### Senate Votes and Legislative Record
Harris has supported legislation aimed at reforming policing practices rather than defunding departments. For example:
- **Justice in Policing Act (2020)**: As a senator, she co-sponsored this bill, which seeks to ban chokeholds, no-knock warrants in drug cases, and racial profiling. It also aimed to create a national police misconduct registry, but the bill did not propose cuts to police budgets.
### Misinterpretation and Criticism
Some critics have suggested that Harris supports defunding the police due to her progressive stances on criminal justice reform and her endorsement of reallocating some police funds to other services, but she has repeatedly clarified her position. While she has aligned with calls for reform, she has rejected the notion of defunding law enforcement agencies.
In summary, **Kamala Harris has not supported defunding the police** but has advocated for rethinking and reforming policing practices, with an emphasis on community investment and accountability.
