Taking out the trash
- Thread starter DANC
- Start date
Good riddance! The so called tolerant ones who are actually the intolerant ones all need to go.
You have to believe that a clever hacker using Trump‘s own truth social account could goad Trump into firing himself.
Let’s align some stock picks before the market opens Monday, bro!
And here I thought that meant Trump and his administration were leaving. Nothing more trashy than them
lmao And you claim you're not HIckory.
This is EXACTLY the type of post he would make.
You fool no one.
In my best Trump impersonation, "Don't poke the bear. Don't ever do it.
You adore both Trump and King David. They have a lot in common.
Tell us more about your support of marital fidelity.
Uh oh, Monday trump will be back to banning TikTok.
I've been married over 35 yrs and have never cheated. I wouldn't even want her to get a different hair color because it would feel like cheating. Let me ask you a question. Were you really upset when Bill Clinton was cheating in the oval office?
The petty revenge continues, and the morons cheer it on.
Who Is Peter Carr And Why Did The Justice Department Fire Longtime Spokesperson?
Peter Carr, DOJ spokesperson since 2013, was fired, he confirmed Friday without providing a reason. He notably led public affairs for Special Counsels Mueller and Smith, managing media during high-profile cases, including those involving Donald Trump. His dismissal marks the end of a decade-long...
Last edited:
What did/do you think about Bill Clinton's known womanizing and sexual misbehavior? What do you think about Donald Trump's known womanizing (cheated on all three of his wives) and sexual misbehavior?
You sure you want to go there?The petty revenge continues, and the morons cheer it on.
Who Is Peter Carr And Why Did The Justice Department Fire Longtime Spokesperson?
Peter Carr, DOJ spokesperson since 2013, was fired, he confirmed Friday without providing a reason. He notably led public affairs for Special Counsels Mueller and Smith, managing media during high-profile cases, including those involving Donald Trump. His dismissal marks the end of a decade-long...www.timesnownews.com
Were you not? Many republicans at the time acted like it was a big deal. Even tried to impeach Clinton for lying about his scandal.
Republicans were the party of morals. The religious party. Despite Newt Gingirch being a fellow adulterer, the Republican Party played it up how they had morals and the Dems didn't.
We all know the truth now given your party's fealty to the most immoral politician of our time. Nothing but political hypocrisy.
I will never understand how someone can vote for trump and then go to church and talk about sinning being bad and not catch the irony.
You left something out. Clinton was impeached for lying under oath. I was upset about that. But if he just had an affair though it would be immoral I would not call for his impeachment.
Both are sins. That is not the issue legally. Clinton lied under oath.
Trump loved his wives. He even buried one on his golf course to protect the native flora (like grass and weeds):
Are These Real 2023 Photos of Ivana Trump's Burial Site at Trump Golf Course?
The in-question photos, taken a year after Ivana Trump was laid to rest, showed the site obscured with grass and weeds.
www.snopes.com
Ahh. Moving the goal posts. You didn't mention jack shit about impeachment until your true savior's morals were called into question.
and here i thought religious people should care about everyone that sinned. Not talking about the law.
There's a reason Trump wouldn't go under oath
He just lies to his followers, which isn't a crime.Lying is just a technicality to these people, Van. It's all about playing gotcha with morals.
See, you're not moral because you aren't condemning people and realize we all fall short.
They're moral, though, because they don't have morals.
Everyone on the Cooler is destined for sainthood...well, except me.
Go where? You immediately Googled to try to find a good "whatabout" as if everything equals everything. You failed again. That article is about replacing appointees and that happens to some appointees in every administration change, especially if the appointee is perceived as not competent or not qualified as many of these were determined to be. Some don't support the new President's agendas. All those sorts of appointee replacements are common. President Trump did the same with many of the appointees that he inherited and that's no problem. This is not the same. This particular person worked through President Trump's entire first term and there have been no reports of incompetence, poor performance, and obviously not being incompetent. This particular removal is good old-fashioned revenge on person who did nothing except his job, but was associated with people the President personally doesn't like. We've seen exactly this from this administration numerous times in the past three months. You'll try to deny the obvious but go right ahead.
President Clinton also lied to the American people. So has President Trump. I don't like that or defend it. Do you have a problem with their lying or want to defend either of them for lying?
I’m convinced he’s a parody account. No serious poster would provide the nonsensical content that he regularly posts.
And you think Peter Carr supported Trump's agenda when he was picked to be the spokesman for Trump's prosecutors? lmao
Pointing out hypocrisy is not whataboutism. If they're common, then why the rending of garments over Peter Carr
We're all these people incompetent or have poor performance?
"On Monday, newly sworn-in Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin opted to wipe the slate completely clean, dismissing hundreds of members across 42 advisory boards"
Public Affairs people put out the messages their boss wants them to put out. It's not an agenda position. As long as they're doing it honestly and competently it's just them doing their jobs.
You didn't point out hypocrisy. You made a very poor attempt at a whatabout as you often do. You have a tendency to believe "everything equals everything" and to complete disregard all differences and circumstances of these various situations.
New bosses replacing inherited advisors is as common as sand on a beach.
