Yes, it's hypocrisy to point out your criticism of Trump for doing the same thing Biden did, with no comment from you. You have a double standard that is shown time and again.
You failed to point out any hypocrisy as usual and you still cannot understand differences between situations. They ARE NOT the same. You're terrible at whataboutism.
"New bosses replacing inherited advisors is as common as sand on a beach."You failed to point out any hypocrisy as usual and you still cannot understand differences between situations. They ARE NOT the same. You're terrible at whataboutism.
Nope - not at all. This guy isn't an advisor who could influence policy, he's just a spokesman. It's not even clear he's an appointee. Many of these guys, except for military spokesmen and the White House Press Secretary, are hired for the job. Employee or appointee, it's clear this guy is being fired merely because of his being the PA guy for Mueller and Smith. You can at least acknowledge that, can't you?
Of course I acknowledge that - when did I ever deny it.
Good for you!
www.newsweek.com
www.bloomberg.com
That's differentJudge accuses Donald Trump of lying under oath
Judge Arthur Engoron found Trump's testimony "not credible" on Wednesday.
My Lawyers Got Trump to Admit 30 Lies Under Oath
Trump sued me, then had to acknowledge 30 times during a deposition that he had lied over the years about a wide range of issues.
When you accept a job that is on the side of putting a former President in jail for bogus charges, you've picked a horse.
Nonsense. The man worked for the DOJ and did the job he was paid to do. The charges weren't bogus (I know you disagree), but it is not the PA guy's job to determine anything about the investigation or the charges because that's not his job. It's the PA guy's job to communicate the DOJ's message.
There is more than one spokesperson for the DoJ.
It's cute you think there wasn't a conspiracy to go after Trump.
It’s not possible for there to be a conspiracy as vast as it would have to be with all the that you believe. Countless investigators, lawyers, judges, leaders, clerks, Trump associates and their sworn statements, and now a spokesman. It’s laughable, but you can believe all the silliness you’d like to believe.
OMG, so precious.
Outside the charge of sexual assault, which was suddenly remembered 30 years later, what else was he convicted of?
Good of them to self-identify...makes getting rid of the problems so much easier.
Bullshit on the FBI Director admitting "trying to catch Trump." Comey? Wray? Link it. The FISA warrant thing is very minor in the overall investigation and it wasn't even for Trump, it was for Carter Page. At any rate, it's absolutely NOT evidence of a conspiracy. Even after all this time you believe some really ridiculous stuff.
I really can't tell if you're being serious.
Unlike you, I've read much of all the reports. You should just read the Executive Summary of the IG report. You won't because it won't support what you think you "know." Just as the Mueller Report, which you've also not bothered to read or even skim, doesn't support what you think you "know." Bottom line - mistakes were made, but there was NO conspiracy.
You didn't ask me, but IMO Clinton should have been convicted in the impeachment and escorted out of the WH.
What specific lie are you talking about with President Trump? Am I against lying? Yes, it's one of the 10 Commandments in Exodus 20.
I argued for it at the time. Of course, as the Florida Congressman (don't remember the guy's name) said when informed by a reporter that any commanding officer in the military would be fired for having an affair with a junior enlisted (Lewinsky equivalent), "the military's standards are too high." Maybe they were and he shouldn't have resigned or be impeached for the fraternization (affair) alone. However, he did commit perjury. If you ever read the Democrat's proposed censure of the President, it's pretty harsh. They basically lay out the case that he's guilty of obstruction and perjury but shouldn't be impeached for it. The Senate voted that down and impeachment played out to his non-conviction in the Senate. It's all history now.
Why should I take you seriously? You say lying is bad and a sin, but he's the most prolific liar ever to be President and you’ve nothing to say about that. You should just be able to comment on that alone. Why do you need a specific lie? Are you going to put these lies on a 1 to 10 on the sin scale?
We know more about the (formerly) private sexual conduct of this board than we are allowed to know about the antics of Congress.
Dan’s only goal is to rile people up here. He has said so himself.You failed to point out any hypocrisy as usual and you still cannot understand differences between situations. They ARE NOT the same. You're terrible at whataboutism.
"Describing how it is usually done, Comey said, “If the FBI wanted to send agents into the White House itself to interview a senior official, you would work through the White House counsel, and there would be discussions and approvals and who would be there.”
