Had to look it up. I am 6:1 (including my bonus) from the lowest paid person in my organization. But that lowest person is entry level and hourly.Cool.
Now (as a renowned virologist, cancer researcher, or whatever you say you're doing for a living now), compare your salary to those who clean your labs and the hallways and post the result.
People think the grind of being a CEO is a cakewalk. I can see why they die early. **** that shit.
It's a helluva lot closer to 1:1 than it is to 475:1. My best guess would be about 5:1.
The point was the 475:1 number is ridiculous and far out of line with the entire world.
What I do for a living is pretty clear, asshole. I am a medicinal chemist. I have worked in pharma and academia, in many disease areas, including cancer, neurodegeneration, pain, and (most recently) antiviral drug discovery (not in the area of vaccines, but in therapeutics). IU PhD 1991.
Sorry. Couldn't help myself.
I took used to enjoy drawing and art work with the kid. Ahh, I miss those days.
We have a Congress problem in that we don't pay them enough to get enough people to consider public service as a career. Or, as murt notes, we treat Congress like the Founderes believed it should be treated and have a rotation of those able to forego their career for 2-8 years for the betterment of the country and to represent their district.That $75,000 raise (some say $70,000) is coming from Twitter Twits and it's false. The max raise would be $6,600 and they haven't had a cost of living increase for 15 years. The law is automatic, but those in Congress have been block that raise since 2009. No skin off my nose if they get it or not, but I'd really like to see an effort to argue for or something accurately. There's almost no effort here with many will to believe what their favorite Twitter Twits say without bothering to check on the facts:
"Members of Congress earn salaries of at least $174,000, with more allocated for some leadership positions. A cost-of-living increase is calculated based on private-sector wages. The maximum allowed for next year is 3.8%, which would bring the base salary to $180,600, according to the CRS report."
Members of Congress rolled a pay raise for themselves into big must-do spending bill • Idaho Capital Sun
Members of Congress are in line for their first pay raise since 2009 if they pass a spending measure that would avert a government shutdown.idahocapitalsun.com
It's in several articles and in the CRS report as it says above.
The latter just isn't going to happen and if it did it would just put a bunch of already rich people into Congress.
Now, if the federal government were to shrink or become more focused on a few responsibilities (and before you textualists get a hardon, my list includes single payor health care), it could be possible to have being a Congressman return to being a part time gig. I hope that's where it's headed