Dear Stoll,
The studio group for champions league is awesome. Really funny former players. Carragher, Henry, Richards. Think Barkley Shaq smith. That vibe. One day they were all talking about Messi and the host lady asked if anyone in the group ever got a text from Messi. And of course Henry played at Barca with him and said yes and the other guy said no and carragher who played at Liverpool was in tears laughing. He said I have one text from Messi and I have kept it for years. It was just one word
Once one proves that they will use their position of power for personal political will (read $$$), they should be forced into fast food service for the rest of their natural lives.
Because no one was ever convicted or criminally accused of "insurrection".
I've read - but not verified - that the 4 Colorado justices that ruled for banning Trump were all Ivy League grads. The 3 who voted against went to law school in Colorado.
All time highs any day (or hour) now. It’s the great asset in human history. Tell the Texan congrats on HODLING.
He’s texted me three times today. Two in all caps
@mcmurtry66
I liked the opinion’s “Federalism“ approach (as reported) that no state agency (official) or court had the authority to make such a decision … This seems like a clear and operable precedent for the rest of the cases brought in state courts. Dana Bash, I would have expected to know better. (Than to have expected Colorado should have won). The notion that courts should return decisions in line with political points of view … is the antithesis of the rule of law.
My lay opinion would be that once the Federal Constitution created the 14th amendment with the states assent, they ceded the authority to regulate the qualification of Federal Election candidate under the ”legal standards” in the 14th amendment.
'The idiotii'...
Off the top of my head, the presidency isn’t a seat in Congress. That argument ignores section 5 and common sense as I’ve repeated written here before. And it wouldn’t be feasible to do it the Colorado way, nationwide.
Brad Stevens, Esq.
Don't go down this Thursday unless you have special sunglasses, the eclipse is a full on eclipse for Daviess County. I hear businesses are shutting down and schools closing?
I only buy 30-50 dollar bottles. I’m going to splurge on something I wouldn’t normally buy.
I'm not selling until it hits $1 million. Then I'll put it all in bearer bonds, like in Die Hard.
At some point nobody will accept the dollar for Bitcoin.
Thinking about it, aren't there a lot of cases decided on section 1 without congressional action? Is congress required to pass legislation to spell out section 1 because of section 5?
Section 5 gives the feds power that actually goes beyond the minimum required of the states by the other sections. So, for example, the amendment itself does not require all the provisions of the Voting Rights Act, but section 5 gives Congress the authority to enact them.
So the words below only mean these rights exist if congress says so? if the VRA were repealed, it would be legal to block groups from voting and there is no recourse to this amendment?
Keith cannot believe voters actually get to decide. Oh the horror.
The assortment of pundits and professors who criticize this decision have the luxury of advancing their arguments with no real world consequences. The Supreme Court does not enjoy that luxury.
