Man you are not good with degrees. Both sides do have morons, but as I said the quality and quantity of what transpired and was allowed by way of assembly was and is markedly different and it cuts by party line. That has nothing to do with COH. I witnessed it first hand. Your post ignored it. The rest of your post lacks any substance, and self awareness, per usual
Per usual? I was just trying to help you out. You looked the fool, so was giving you a friendly heads up.
I guess I forgot how defensive you get when you are busy stroking off COH. As per usual.
Lmao. A triggered message escapes the bubble. Go back to triggered snipe. It suits you better than attempting content.
Will do. You’ve never steered me wrong yet.
Independence Day is incredible
I agree with his take. Again compare and contrast what transpired last summer with what Cosmic posted as it relates to time/place restrictions. Notice again your post ignores the substance of what he wrote.
As for your helping me out - lol - self awareness...per usual.
Last edited:
Looks like I struck a nerve.
Sorry, mcm, but if you work hard at it you might be able to be your own man someday. You don't need to ask CoHvac for permission.
Not at all. I've yet to see anyone challenge the substance of his or my posts as they relate to assembly/time/place and political bent. Autonomous zone or whatever it was called....Looks like I struck a nerve.
Sorry, mcm, but if you work hard at it you might be able to be your own man someday. You don't need to ask CoHvac for permission.
We're seeing that lack of deference manifest in other ways from housing nationalization to vaccine mandates as well.
Last edited:
Read Watchers. You really don't need to read anything else by him.
Why does the left here usually fall back to that “I struck a nerve” baloney? All that tells me that you’ve got nothing relevant to say. That goes into the same file as “lacks self-awareness”.Looks like I struck a nerve.
Sorry, mcm, but if you work hard at it you might be able to be your own man someday. You don't need to ask CoHvac for permission.
Discussing the left and right views of the limits of free speech could be interesting but all we get from the left here is indignation and whatsboutism.
Carry on hoos.
Lol. Did you ever consider assembling all your condescending paternalistic posts into a book? Maybe Cosmic would enjoy it.
The substance of his post was that the left was bad, and the right was good. The let wanted to restrict free speech. The right only wanted to restrict violence and intimidation. Cosmic's post demonstrated that COH's point was bullshit.
You jumped on Cosmic. As I said already, your refrain that "both sides have morons" implicitly rejected COH's main point, which was that the left were the morons. You should have replied to COH, not Cosmic. But you didn't. You liked COH's post. You didn't defend it, but you liked it. But then, when COH was able to come up with some sort of twisted logic explaining what he really meant (as opposed to what he actually wrote), you jumped on that, and repeated it, just like a good little...what's the word?...oh yeah, "bot."
It must get confusing, having both a stoker and a stroker
Looks like I struck a relevant nerve.
There are certainly people from all parts of the political spectrum here who it would be interesting to discuss the limits of free speech with, but discussing the left and right views of the limits of free speech couldn't be interesting with you because your only lens on it is "left bad". I agree with mcm,
Some might say he made a "lacks self-awareness" post about that moron who fails to recognize it.
Again you lack self awareness in having the temerity to think you can help by imposing your biased opinion. That you want to impute what I think just muddies the waters. I expressed in several posts what I think re time and place restrictions and the events of the parties as they relate to political bent. I went to law school. Had the great Pat Baude. They are my thoughts, to the extent they comport with those of COH hooray.
Looks like I struck a relevant nerve.
There are certainly people from all parts of the political spectrum here who it would be interesting to discuss the limits of free speech with, but discussing the left and right views of the limits of free speech couldn't be interesting with you because your only lens on it is "left bad". I agree with mcm,
Some might say he made a "lacks self-awareness" post about that moron who fails to recognize it.
There are morons on both sides, but that's not the interesting part. How political people respond to the limits and restrictions such as time and place is more interesting, and imo that wasn't and hasn't been equal, as evidenced by the responses or lack thereof to the respective riots/protests.
That's what I was commenting on from Coh's post, now ad nauseam.
And the examples Cosmic shared showed that plenty of people on the right don't give three shits about reasonable time and place restrictions. The problem with COH's post wasn't the ability to draw a distinction between reasonable and unreasonable restrictions. It was his claim that it was almost exclusively the left who wanted unreasonable restrictions and the right who wanted only reasonable ones. Cosmic's post undermined COH's main point, but you couldn't see past your disdain for Cosmic to notice it. Instead, you simply dismissed him as a "bot."
No Cosmic's post ignored the degrees - as do you. The degrees/extent of what the right and left ignored is markedly different. What's more Cosmic, in keeping with one way news, said "show me a hospital being blocked" so I did. Along with all the other actions he conveniently yet typically ignored. Cosmic is a bot. He only sees/hears one set of news/stories. It's patent at this point.
To the extent that Cosmic thinks this type of bad behavior is almost entirely the purview of the right, he is just as wrong as COH was. The problem is that you defended COH's wrongness while attacking Cosmic's wrongness, even though they are identical wrongnesses! (Try saying that tongue-twister out loud.)
If you could just bring yourself to say, "You know, on second thought, I was too quick to defend COH, because his post was bad, and wrongly attempted to place all or almost all of the blame for bad behavior on the left," this conversation could be over.
Lol GFY. I commented on the part re time and place restrictions as they related to protests and riots and political bent. I agree with COH in that regard, not Cosmic. The left was far worse. The rest you are trying to wrongheadedly impute.
Last edited:
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
Not everyone is as talented as you in fng themselves. Must be all the practice.
I think you might be forgetting the extreme time and place restrictions the right placed on anti-Trump demonstrators wanting to express themselves in the vicinity of Trump's crazy rallies over the past couple years.
But, those rightwingers still claim to believe in "free speech" (as they view it).
Quit stereotyping.
You'd be impressive if ever you would viciously attack leftleaning posters one-at-a-time.
I am confused, I have consistently argued that protestors at the BLM who did not break into stores, throw molotovs, etc, have a right to protest and it should not be denied because a small fraction acted stupid.
All conservatives at the Jan 6 riot who did not break into the capitol nor attack the police should be free to protest, even back outside the capitol. They should not be punished because of a few stupid ones.
So why am I wrong?
All conservatives at the Jan 6 riot who did not break into the capitol nor attack the police should be free to protest, even back outside the capitol. They should not be punished because of a few stupid ones.
So why am I wrong?
You should write the foreword on that. I'm sure that Goat would namecheck you as an inspiration on his promotional tour.
/Snipe. That one is for @mcmurtry66 .
I first heard about him during the Bush years when he was pushing the 9/11 Truther conspiracies which were popular with the far left so I thought he was a far left moonbat. Guess he wasn't actually a moonbat, he pushes conspiracy theories whether they're from the left or the right. I've heard he actually doesn't believe any of these conspiracies himself. He's basically a slimeball trying to make money pushing crap which is popular with the fringes.Here's hoping every penny Alex Jones has or ever will have ends up in the pockets of the Sandy Hook families and their attorneys:
Connecticut judge orders Infowars’ Alex Jones to pay damages to families of Sandy Hook shooting victims in defamation lawsuits
A Connecticut judge has ruled conspiracy theorist Alex Jones is responsible for all damages in the defamation lawsuits brought against him by the families of those killed in the 2012 Sandy Hook sch…www.courant.com
Here's something else that indicates both you and I are mortal: it is fricking impossible to write a perfect post or perfect response that satisfies both you (as the author) and the guy you were responding to/engaging with, plus placates in advance the unknown, unidentified random hordes of serious/unserious/ridiculous hangerson who might not know either how to diagram a sentence or even how to tie their shoes.
You are being called wrong, because you are being reasonable, but many of your rightwinger opponents are being absolutist, claiming that everything that happened on Jan. 6 was "free speech" or, worse yet, didn't happen at all or was just "tourists."
Why don't you save him some time?
You seem to be saving and documenting all his posts you think fall into that category. Just publish your list and eliminate the variable. I'm just saying.
I gotta admit that as a lawyer, I'm glad to see a judge finally hammer SOMEBODY on discovery abuse (assuming it was as represented).
Otherwise, I have no dog in the Jones fight.
I'd bet he have won as to the substance of his "show." Selling shit on radio is as American as Art Bell pie.
Otherwise, I have no dog in the Jones fight.
I'd bet he have won as to the substance of his "show." Selling shit on radio is as American as Art Bell pie.
A
anon_6hv78pr714xta
Guest
I'm liking this post as to a judge FINALLY hammering someone for discovery abuse. It's ridiculous how much leeway 99% of judges give.
I doubt he could have defended this suit. Indeed, that's probably the reason for the discovery abuse.
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
Similar threads
