Sampson owns Painter

[Joetboiler]

They’ve never been elite. They’ve had better teams than IU much of the past 10 years, but that ain’t saying much since we’re at a low point in program history. But PU & elite have never belonged in the same sentence, unless it’s in the context of playing second fiddle to an elite IU program for decades. It really chaps them that in spite of recent struggles, IU is listed as a better job/program in virtually any listing of such. One of the reasons they’re over here trolling all of the time, & the same reason some IU people troll over there, to try to make themselves feel better. IU about recent history& PU about forever….

If IU is such an elite program and such a coveted job why did IU have to go with Plan k, l, or m for your hire? A guy who didn’t even make the tournament? Am I correct that of all the new coaches in the BT IU hired the only guy who didn’t make the tournament? Why could you not pluck a FF or E8 guy? I mean it IS Indiana Basketball. People should be begging to follow RMK.

And if IU is such an elite program and blue blood why did all your players jump in the portal? Do they not know the prestige of wearing the candy stripes? I mean, they wouldn't have only bern playing for a check? I mean. It’s INDIANA BASKETBALL. They should pay you.

And to me your yearly non-con schedule looks like something for a mid-level Summit League. Who was your marquee this year? South Carolina? Just how many 300 plus Ken Poms can one school schedule?

Acceptance that it is not the 1980s and your program is more similar to Iowa and Rutgers than Duke and Kentucky may center you moving forward.

 

[Big Red Crimson Buffalo]

It's a condition where people bond with their abusers( Purdue abuses iu on a yearly basis).

Woodson was perhaps one of the worst coaches IU has ever had and still went 4-4 against Purdue.
This season was another turd and IU still beat Purdue by 15 points at home and lost in the last minute at Purdue.
If that’s your definition of abuse, have at it.

 

[Courtsensetwo]

If IU is such an elite program and such a coveted job why did IU have to go with Plan k, l, or m for your hire? A guy who didn’t even make the tournament? Am I correct that of all the new coaches in the BT IU hired the only guy who didn’t make the tournament? Why could you not pluck a FF or E8 guy? I mean it IS Indiana Basketball. People should be begging to follow RMK.

And if IU is such an elite program and blue blood why did all your players jump in the portal? Do they not know the prestige of wearing the candy stripes? I mean, they wouldn't have only bern playing for a check? I mean. It’s INDIANA BASKETBALL. They should pay you.

And to me your yearly non-con schedule looks like something for a mid-level Summit League. Who was your marquee this year? South Carolina? Just how many 300 plus Ken Poms can one school schedule?

Acceptance that it is not the 1980s and your program is more similar to Iowa and Rutgers than Duke and Kentucky may center you moving forward.

Two things you proved in this sobbing post

1. You know nothing about this hiring situation or process

2. You know nothing about what just happened with the portal

Move along

 

[Courtsensetwo]

It's a condition where people bond with their abusers( Purdue abuses iu on a yearly basis).

Earlier you said the refs screwed pu out of two wins this season. To your credit that is five less games than most of your pu pals claim pu was screwed in

You said one was the final
Game vs Houston but could not describe how they were screwed. Nor could you recall which was the second game they were screwed out of.

Since you are here, Any jogs to that memory?

 

[UTFO]

In five decades I can't ever remember talking football with an Indiana fan. It's always been basketball. For some reason it seems like most Indiana loyalists historically follow Notre Dame for the most part - and the conversation turns to the Irish.

most indiana loyalists are not also ND fans.

 

[UTFO]

It's a condition where people bond with their abusers( Purdue abuses iu on a yearly basis).

we split in bball and we destroyed you in football last year?

 

[Courtsensetwo]

got it because we are now the elite program in state of Indiana

Your 15 minutes are up.

 

[Courtsensetwo]

In five decades I can't ever remember talking football with an Indiana fan. It's always been basketball. For some reason it seems like most Indiana loyalists historically follow Notre Dame for the most part - and the conversation turns to the Irish.

This isn't remotely accurate, but we understand your need to take jabs. I have read fans with these allegiances, but have never met one.

 

[BoilerN]

IU has been to as many Final Fours as PU this century. Do you know how many schools have won an NCAA championship? 37. Do you know how many schools have won multiple championships? 15. Roughly half of PU's BT championships came before the NCAA era. I'll give it to Painter, he didn't shit the bed against double digit seeds this year: he normally does. Painter is a good coach, but he is way closer to Keady than RMK: took him 25 years to make a FF.

Normally losing to double digit seeds would imply that’s what happens the most. Without looking, I’d guess he’s lost to more 1 seeds than double digit seeds. But that doesn’t fit your narrative

 

[apm1003]

IU has been to as many Final Fours as PU this century. Do you know how many schools have won an NCAA championship? 37. Do you know how many schools have won multiple championships? 15. Roughly half of PU's BT championships came before the NCAA era. I'll give it to Painter, he didn't shit the bed against double digit seeds this year: he normally does. Painter is a good coach, but he is way closer to Keady than RMK: took him 25 years to make a FF.

I wasn't aware that there was a statute of limitations on conference championships. Does that rule also accrue to NCAAs? I guess Army, ND's in the 1920s, 30s and 40s and the Minnesota football teams of the 1950 and 1960s will have to downgrade their national championships as well.

By the way, as you started this thread with the title, I remember on Friday's broadcast it was mentioned that Sampson's record at IU against Painter was 2-1. You claimed in the title of the thread that meant after Friday that Sampson "owned" Painter.

Now, we know that when coaching IU Sampson was cheating in recruiting. You posted that Purdue should be glad Sampson left IU. That is backwards and wrong. IU left Sampson; they fired him. But what is clear is that he was cheating when he achieved those two wins. Thus, they should be considered tainted. Surely as an attorney you must be familiar with the concept of "The Fruit of the Poisonous Tree" where any evidence subsequently derived from improper behavior by law enforcement should be ignored due to being tainted. It would seem to be analogous in this case. So if those two wins are tossed as tainted, that would make it 1-1, with Painter having a point differential.

As an attorney, you should have had this concept presented to you in class and it should be familiar to you. However, it seems not to have impacted your reasoning. Perhaps you missed class the day that was presented.

 

[apm1003]

That’s even more hilarious, that not once has your second tier program been able to achieve what these have. Your desperate need for validation is clouding your ability to think (or you’re just stupid). Winning a championship alone doesn’t make a program elite, but a program can’t be elite without one. And you forgot the San Francisco Dons, even they won two. 🤣🤣

I didn't forget the USF Dons of Bill Russell and KC Jones fame, I just didn't include them. Your post #103 in this thread states that ending "... the season as #1, which is the only time that really matters..." in the determination of elite. I am not misquoting you. Your words and meaning are clear and posted for all to see. There is no lack of clarity in your definition. I was just pointing out that applying your definition leads to an outcome that is silly. Again, you posted those words, I am simply applying them and the results are as indicated.

 

[Courtsensetwo]

Love it! So the fourth PU fan in the last 48 hours has taken the time to

Create a new email address
Create a new Rivals Account

Just to follow me and sob about my posts!

Welcome @Rent free baby

Rent free

 

[HoosierJimbo89]

I wasn't aware that there was a statute of limitations on conference championships. Does that rule also accrue to NCAAs? I guess Army, ND's in the 1920s, 30s and 40s and the Minnesota football teams of the 1950 and 1960s will have to downgrade their national championships as well.

By the way, as you started this thread with the title, I remember on Friday's broadcast it was mentioned that Sampson's record at IU against Painter was 2-1. You claimed in the title of the thread that meant after Friday that Sampson "owned" Painter.

Now, we know that when coaching IU Sampson was cheating in recruiting. You posted that Purdue should be glad Sampson left IU. That is backwards and wrong. IU left Sampson; they fired him. But what is clear is that he was cheating when he achieved those two wins. Thus, they should be considered tainted. Surely as an attorney you must be familiar with the concept of "The Fruit of the Poisonous Tree" where any evidence subsequently derived from improper behavior by law enforcement should be ignored due to being tainted. It would seem to be analogous in this case. So if those two wins are tossed as tainted, that would make it 1-1, with Painter having a point differential.

As an attorney, you should have had this concept presented to you in class and it should be familiar to you. However, it seems not to have impacted your reasoning. Perhaps you missed class the day that was presented.

There is no way you are employed. Neat pseudo-lawyering.

 

[abraxis]

smith said he wasn't going to let Cryer shoot. saw films of the play.

cox was late

man, i wish we had B Smith...

I wish we had Kaufman-Renn. Smith was never on our radar, but Trey certainly was. Balling it just down the road in Sellersburg, he was ours to lose and that we did.

 

[kmathum]

I wish we had Kaufman-Renn. Smith was never on our radar, but Trey certainly was. Balling it just down the road in Sellersburg, he was ours to lose and that we did.

Yeah but Bloom didn’t like him. And that's the kiss of death.

 

[Courtsensetwo]

Yeah but Bloom didn’t like him. And that's the kiss of death.

He may decide to come for the cash

 

[Courtsensetwo]

There is no way you are employed. Neat pseudo-lawyering.

He has a lot of time since he was booted from his own board

 

[apm1003]

There is no way you are employed. Neat pseudo-lawyering.

I am not an attorney, but my immediate family is full of them. When you have a situation like that, you learn a lot about topics in law just by listening and asking questions. Most of them were Law Review at the respective institutions so they are pretty knowledgeable on a wide range of legal issues. So I absorbed some knowledge by osmosis if not anything else. And throughout my personal and professional life I have had to sign many contracts and I can be held to their terms because I am told that I can read those terms and understand their meanings and consequences.

But your strategy is to deflect from my post, rather than explain why I might be in error. Did I misstate the Fruit theory? if so, how? If I didn't, then why is it not analogous? Your choice to dismiss without explanation suggests that you don't have an intelligent answer. Otherwise, I'd like to see it.

I was also taught that the first to resort to the ad hominem is the person on the losing side of the discussion.

 

[apm1003]

He has a lot of time since he was booted from his own board

You keep repeating that charge. It isn't true. When previously asked when you posted this, I asked how would you know if anyone else was booted from any board unless you are a mod? How would anyone? And I really don't think that you are a GBI mod. You may recall your comment before when challenged on this was that you didn't know for sure and that maybe you heard it from someone else. Now you are repeating a false charge. Why don't you back up your claim? Prove it. It will be hard because over the years I have had many posts there and posted over this past weekend. By the way, my likes/posts ratio there is 1.5/1, so I don't think that fits your claim. You are making things up, classic courtsense go-to.

 

[johnboiler123]

He may decide to come for the cash

Why would he transfer just to take a step down?

 

[HoosierJimbo89]

I am not an attorney, but my immediate family is full of them. When you have a situation like that, you learn a lot about topics in law just by listening and asking questions. Most of them were Law Review at the respective institutions so they are pretty knowledgeable on a wide range of legal issues. So I absorbed some knowledge by osmosis if not anything else. And throughout my personal and professional life I have had to sign many contracts and I can be held to their terms because I am told that I can read those terms and understand their meanings and consequences.

But your strategy is to deflect from my post, rather than explain why I might be in error. Did I misstate the Fruit theory? if so, how? If I didn't, then why is it not analogous? Your choice to dismiss without explanation suggests that you don't have an intelligent answer. Otherwise, I'd like to see it.

I was also taught that the first to resort to the ad hominem is the person on the losing side of the discussion.

I don't debate every nut on the street for obvious reasons. Enjoy playing with yourself.

 

[Courtsensetwo]

Why would he transfer just to take a step down?

Cash. Dumb ass

 

[Courtsensetwo]

You keep repeating that charge. It isn't true. When previously asked when you posted this, I asked how would you know if anyone else was booted from any board unless you are a mod? How would anyone? And I really don't think that you are a GBI mod. You may recall your comment before when challenged on this was that you didn't know for sure and that maybe you heard it from someone else. Now you are repeating a false charge. Why don't you back up your claim? Prove it. It will be hard because over the years I have had many posts there and posted over this past weekend. By the way, my likes/posts ratio there is 1.5/1, so I don't think that fits your claim. You are making things up, classic courtsense go-to.

Did you say something?

 

[johnboiler123]

Cash. Dumb ass

He'll be paid handsomely at Purdue as well, which is why the idea of transferring to an inferior program makes zero sense.

 

[apm1003]

Did you say something?

I did, I stated that you are a complete fabulist.

 

[Courtsensetwo]

He'll be paid handsomely at Purdue as well, which is why the idea of transferring to an inferior program makes zero sense.

lol, sure Jan...with what?

BTW you still owe an answer to which game other than Houston did the refs screw you out of, and how exactly did the refs screw you out of the Houston game.

I'll hang up and listen.

 

[Courtsensetwo]

I did, I stated that you are a complete fabulist.

Oh, so mumbles as always.

BTW, have you told Colvin's parents about how bad their kid is...or did you learn your lesson last time when Momma dog walked your fat ass down Broadway??

Rent free

 

[apm1003]

Oh, so mumbles as always.

BTW, have you told Colvin's parents about how bad their kid is...or did you learn your lesson last time when Momma dog walked your fat ass down Broadway??

Rent free

Another fable by you. Note: you have never shown where all those posts trashing Colvin are found. I have looked at all the major and even minor Purdue sites and can't find them. You always asking for a source from others, how about providing one yourself so it can be seen or if you are making things up? Let everyone see for themselves.

 

[Courtsensetwo]

Another fable by you. Note: you have never shown where all those posts trashing Colvin are found. I have looked at all the major and even minor Purdue sites and can't find them. You always asking for a source from others, how about providing one yourself so it can be seen or if you are making things up? Let everyone see for themselves.

You have denied getting dog walked by Nojel Eastern's Mom. Here is the IU player trashing Thread started by you:

"There are posts on the free board on the other site about a fight in Btown after the OSU game. It may be true or total rumor. Supposedly the fight was between two guards. One was claimed to be suspended. The alleged fight was between a guard that does whatever he wants and another"

"Care to guess who was who"?

After another PU poster said maybe it was after the UM game, you post...

"Which players were supposedly in that one? Where there is that much smoke there is likely fire. No wonder that they are on the streak that they are. It seems there is no positive chemistry"

Then Ms Reed...Nojel Eastern's Mom who has known TJD and Justin Smith, whom you trashed, from elementary school responds to you and your embittered thread with...

"Absolutely no truth to that i no Justin smith personally spreading rumors like that is bad whoever put that out there. That kid is a great young man been knowing him since 3rd grade and he is not a person that engage in stuff like that so whoever is trying to paint a picture about that kid or players in general is wrong for doing that. Don’t beat a kid or team down while they are down just a month or so ago Purdue was in a rough stretch as well those players are feeling bad enough they don’t need rumors being spread about them when none of that is true. I get the rivalry thing btwn the 2 schools but as a parent I certainly didn’t like some negative things being said about my son or this Purdue team they all as players have enough to deal with than adults spreading false rumors about them".

and

"I’m not responding to that person anymore he is who he is. I’m not here to tell that person what to do he feel good about talking about my son all the time so be it. Again my life nor my son life revolves around an internet fan"

I only spent a few minutes on this, but it looks like some of your posts telling Nojel's Mom that he wasn't good enough to play in the NBA have been taken down or you deleted them. There is more but this gives everyone a taste of who you are.

Don't make claims about me that are not true.

 

[apm1003]

You have denied getting dog walked by Nojel Eastern's Mom. Here is the IU player trashing Thread started by you:

"There are posts on the free board on the other site about a fight in Btown after the OSU game. It may be true or total rumor. Supposedly the fight was between two guards. One was claimed to be suspended. The alleged fight was between a guard that does whatever he wants and another"

"Care to guess who was who"?

After another PU poster said maybe it was after the UM game, you post...

"Which players were supposedly in that one? Where there is that much smoke there is likely fire. No wonder that they are on the streak that they are. It seems there is no positive chemistry"

Then Ms Reed...Nojel Eastern's Mom who has known TJD and Justin Smith, whom you trashed, from elementary school responds to you and your embittered thread with...

"Absolutely no truth to that i no Justin smith personally spreading rumors like that is bad whoever put that out there. That kid is a great young man been knowing him since 3rd grade and he is not a person that engage in stuff like that so whoever is trying to paint a picture about that kid or players in general is wrong for doing that. Don’t beat a kid or team down while they are down just a month or so ago Purdue was in a rough stretch as well those players are feeling bad enough they don’t need rumors being spread about them when none of that is true. I get the rivalry thing btwn the 2 schools but as a parent I certainly didn’t like some negative things being said about my son or this Purdue team they all as players have enough to deal with than adults spreading false rumors about them".

and

"I’m not responding to that person anymore he is who he is. I’m not here to tell that person what to do he feel good about talking about my son all the time so be it. Again my life nor my son life revolves around an internet fan"

I only spent a few minutes on this, but it looks like some of your posts telling Nojel's Mom that he wasn't good enough to play in the NBA have been taken down or you deleted them. There is more but this gives everyone a taste of who you are.

Don't make claims about me that are not true. about a fight ab

First of all, I am glad that you posted that. Where is the trashing? I posted that there was a post made by another about a fight and pointed out that it may or may not be true. I was asking a question and seeking clarification. Given the then present circumstances raised the probability, but not certainty, that an event occurred. As your post points out, I didn't trash anyone since i was seeking information and asserting nothing. Note the use of the conditional in the questioning (likely, supposedly, alleged, etc.) Also, the post was made about posts made on this board.

If anyone was out of bounds it was Ms. Reed, who claimed because she knew someone since elementary school, she could judge with certainty what he would/would not do a dozen years later. Her statement is totally absurd. News reports of serious crimes often include quotes from family members, friends and neighbors shocked by the identification of the perpetrator since they knew him a long time and never thought him capable of such an act.

Like me, Ms. Reed was not there when reported events supposedly occurred so she had no basis for any firm denial of any potential event. And her characterization of a beating down is clearly ridiculous by your own posting. What was said that was terribly objectionable?

As for her post about my comment regarding Nojel: Ms. Reed was rather well known on the Purdue Rivals board for her repeated assurance that Nojel would be a first-round draft pick. In a thread, I pointed out that given his play and statistics, that seemed somewhat unlikely. That proved to be an accurate statement; but she took offense. By the way, I was not the only person in the thread making that observation. Nojel was never drafted and did not play in the NBA to date. I just looked it up, he is in the G-League. Last I saw he was playing in Mexico and rapping.

If anything, Ms. Reed was generally considered to be a "volatile" poster on the board at that time whose views were not commonly shared. I am being polite.

But I am sincere in being pleased that you posted those old posts. I have always maintained that you have hyperbolically mischaracterized the posts and now that they are posted readers can see for themselves that I am correct. There's nothing really bad there. As the old saying goes: is that all you've got?

 

[T.M.P.]

First of all, I am glad that you posted that. Where is the trashing? I posted that there was a post made by another about a fight and pointed out that it may or may not be true. I was asking a question and seeking clarification. Given the then present circumstances raised the probability, but not certainty, that an event occurred. As your post points out, I didn't trash anyone since i was seeking information and asserting nothing. Note the use of the conditional in the questioning (likely, supposedly, alleged, etc.) Also, the post was made about posts made on this board.

If anyone was out of bounds it was Ms. Reed, who claimed because she knew someone since elementary school, she could judge with certainty what he would/would not do a dozen years later. Her statement is totally absurd. News reports of serious crimes often include quotes from family members, friends and neighbors shocked by the identification of the perpetrator since they knew him a long time and never thought him capable of such an act.

Like me, Ms. Reed was not there when reported events supposedly occurred so she had no basis for any firm denial of any potential event. And her characterization of a beating down is clearly ridiculous by your own posting. What was said that was terribly objectionable?

As for her post about my comment regarding Nojel: Ms. Reed was rather well known on the Purdue Rivals board for her repeated assurance that Nojel would be a first-round draft pick. In a thread, I pointed out that given his play and statistics, that seemed somewhat unlikely. That proved to be an accurate statement; but she took offense. By the way, I was not the only person in the thread making that observation. Nojel was never drafted and did not play in the NBA to date. I just looked it up, he is in the G-League. Last I saw he was playing in Mexico and rapping.

If anything, Ms. Reed was generally considered to be a "volatile" poster on the board at that time whose views were not commonly shared. I am being polite.

But I am sincere in being pleased that you posted those old posts. I have always maintained that you have hyperbolically mischaracterized the posts and now that they are posted readers can see for themselves that I am correct. There's nothing really bad there. As the old saying goes: is that all you've got?

TD : DR

 

[Courtsensetwo]

First of all, I am glad that you posted that. Where is the trashing? I posted that there was a post made by another about a fight and pointed out that it may or may not be true. I was asking a question and seeking clarification. Given the then present circumstances raised the probability, but not certainty, that an event occurred. As your post points out, I didn't trash anyone since i was seeking information and asserting nothing. Note the use of the conditional in the questioning (likely, supposedly, alleged, etc.) Also, the post was made about posts made on this board.

If anyone was out of bounds it was Ms. Reed, who claimed because she knew someone since elementary school, she could judge with certainty what he would/would not do a dozen years later. Her statement is totally absurd. News reports of serious crimes often include quotes from family members, friends and neighbors shocked by the identification of the perpetrator since they knew him a long time and never thought him capable of such an act.

Like me, Ms. Reed was not there when reported events supposedly occurred so she had no basis for any firm denial of any potential event. And her characterization of a beating down is clearly ridiculous by your own posting. What was said that was terribly objectionable?

As for her post about my comment regarding Nojel: Ms. Reed was rather well known on the Purdue Rivals board for her repeated assurance that Nojel would be a first-round draft pick. In a thread, I pointed out that given his play and statistics, that seemed somewhat unlikely. That proved to be an accurate statement; but she took offense. By the way, I was not the only person in the thread making that observation. Nojel was never drafted and did not play in the NBA to date. I just looked it up, he is in the G-League. Last I saw he was playing in Mexico and rapping.

If anything, Ms. Reed was generally considered to be a "volatile" poster on the board at that time whose views were not commonly shared. I am being polite.

But I am sincere in being pleased that you posted those old posts. I have always maintained that you have hyperbolically mischaracterized the posts and now that they are posted readers can see for themselves that I am correct. There's nothing really bad there. As the old saying goes: is that all you've got?

She dogwalked your ass more than once. It was hilarious to see.

Now, have you attacked the Colvin family yet and told them how shitty you think Myles is, let us know cause I want to see Rosevelt dog walk your ass.

 

[apm1003]

Everyone can see what you posted. There was no trashing of anyone; there is simply your claim of it. Far worse things are said on this board about Purdue and even IU players without an eyelash being fluttered. Trashing is posting something like "XXX is a no good so-and-so and is a horrible person." Here's a hint: it's not there or else you'd have posted it. it is simply your crazy definition of trashing.

As for Ms. Reed, I was polite in referencing her and did not engage with her other than to disagree with her post. Ms. Reed had no basis for her remarks as she had no knowledge of the situation that happened. She wasn't there and thus could not speak authoritatively - which she was trying to do. She was a person of strong opinions that were not always based in fact - and I am again being polite. So if you want to base your claim on the words of someone who was often viewed as "emotionally challenged" - and again I am being polite - then have at it. But remember on whose words you are citing; consider the source.

Everyone can read; there's no there, there - other than gross mischaracterization on your part. As I posted, I am really glad that you posted these things so everyone can see how silly you are.

 

[Courtsensetwo]

Everyone can see what you posted. There was no trashing of anyone; there is simply your claim of it. Far worse things are said on this board about Purdue and even IU players without an eyelash being fluttered. Trashing is posting something like "XXX is a no good so-and-so and is a horrible person." Here's a hint: it's not there or else you'd have posted it. it is simply your crazy definition of trashing.

As for Ms. Reed, I was polite in referencing her and did not engage with her other than to disagree with her post. Ms. Reed had no basis for her remarks as she had no knowledge of the situation that happened. She wasn't there and thus could not speak authoritatively - which she was trying to do. She was a person of strong opinions that were not always based in fact - and I am again being polite. So if you want to base your claim on the words of someone who was often viewed as "emotionally challenged" - and again I am being polite - then have at it. But remember on whose words you are citing; consider the source.

Everyone can read; there's no there, there - other than gross mischaracterization on your part. As I posted, I am really glad that you posted these things so everyone can see how silly you are.

Dogwalked

 

[VanPastorMan]

Painter hasn't even passed Mike Davis in FF's after 25 years. Bob Knight won over 900 games, Painter hasn't won 500. What the hell are you talking about?

Blimpy is probably a good guy but is bad at math. Of course he could be thinking Coach Painter will coach till he is 85.

 

[ams66]

Everyone can see what you posted. There was no trashing of anyone; there is simply your claim of it. Far worse things are said on this board about Purdue and even IU players without an eyelash being fluttered. Trashing is posting something like "XXX is a no good so-and-so and is a horrible person." Here's a hint: it's not there or else you'd have posted it. it is simply your crazy definition of trashing.

As for Ms. Reed, I was polite in referencing her and did not engage with her other than to disagree with her post. Ms. Reed had no basis for her remarks as she had no knowledge of the situation that happened. She wasn't there and thus could not speak authoritatively - which she was trying to do. She was a person of strong opinions that were not always based in fact - and I am again being polite. So if you want to base your claim on the words of someone who was often viewed as "emotionally challenged" - and again I am being polite - then have at it. But remember on whose words you are citing; consider the source.

Everyone can read; there's no there, there - other than gross mischaracterization on your part. As I posted, I am really glad that you posted these things so everyone can see how silly you are.

It is hilarious to see you continually here, begging for validation and approval, when nobody gives two shits about anything you are saying.

 

[apm1003]

It is hilarious to see you continually here, begging for validation and approval, when nobody gives two shits about anything you are saying.

You are 100% wrong. I do not seek the validation or approval of someone that I do not respect. If you are honest, you can read the basis for courtsense's nonsensical claim and see how silly it is. But your prejudice prevents it. So why would I seek your approval? It is worthless to hold.

 

[Courtsensetwo]

You are 100% wrong. I do not seek the validation or approval of someone that I do not respect. If you are honest, you can read the basis for courtsense's nonsensical claim and see how silly it is. But your prejudice prevents it. So why would I seek your approval? It is worthless to hold.

woof woof sit

 

[HoosierJimbo89]

You are 100% wrong. I do not seek the validation or approval of someone that I do not respect. If you are honest, you can read the basis for courtsense's nonsensical claim and see how silly it is. But your prejudice prevents it. So why would I seek your approval? It is worthless to hold.

Are you still babbling? Go get a life.

 

[T.M.P.]

You keep repeating that charge. It isn't true. When previously asked when you posted this, I asked how would you know if anyone else was booted from any board unless you are a mod? How would anyone? And I really don't think that you are a GBI mod. You may recall your comment before when challenged on this was that you didn't know for sure and that maybe you heard it from someone else. Now you are repeating a false charge. Why don't you back up your claim? Prove it. It will be hard because over the years I have had many posts there and posted over this past weekend. By the way, my likes/posts ratio there is 1.5/1, so I don't think that fits your claim. You are making things up, classic courtsense go-to.

Your shit is boring. It has nothing to do with basketball, it's all about your fragile little ego and need for validation.

STFU and go away, Poindexter.