Run, Jack, run!
- Thread starter DANC
- Start date
Trumps lawyers say justice is coming.
Jack smith is fckd! Royally. She may be a shitty lawyer but I guarantee she’s great at ruining men
These people are nothing if not dedicated to getting the attention of their lord and savior, Donald J Trump. I wouldn't be surprised if he retweets all of them during one of his post midnight shits.
Content filled, as usual.
Are you 14 years old?
As much as I hate to let you down, I'm not an underaged, teenage boy. I think you have this forum confused with some of the other sites you visit.
How would you know? What sites are you visiting where you regularly see posts from 14 year old boys? For what it's worth, I'm guessing some of those 'kids' are undercover cops.
Why does Jack Smith always look like he suffers from major depression and hooked on anti-depressants?
And he is a bad lawyer to boot.
Now I'm glad the idiots coined the term "lawfare" because now we have a word for what they are gleefully promising to engage in.
No different than Alvin Bragg or Fani Willis promising to nail Trump if they got elected.
That doesn’t make cheering it right of course, but it’s worth noting that the lawfare started with people pursuing Trump.
I think the difference is that Trump was legitimately indicted for crimes. The MAGA crowd is promising to go after the lawyers who did the indicting.
Fair. But I'm not sure Bragg or Willis would agree that they did anything wrong. The MAGA contingent are happily promising to do that which they've been screaming for eight years is evil.
It’s entirely different. Trump has flouted the law his entire adult life.
My Grandson is 7..
You sound 'slightly' more mature than him...but he is 'gifted and talented,'
Doc is right that the part I was complaining about is not entirely different. Maybe slightly different motivations, but it's still a promise to use the legal system to go after your opponents.
It’s the same nonsense. People set out to find a crime against people you don’t like. You’re correct
Nah. Kinda like a prosecutor vowing to go after organized crime and/or a mob family.
That apple sure fell, then bounced, then roooooolled miles away from the tree.
You’re no different than the most rabid MAGAs. You feel it’s justifiably used against your opponents but completely unprecedented and dangerous against your guy.
The fact that you can’t see that is funny to me.
If they didn't break the law, why are they worried? Isn't that what we've been told?
Not just “going after” your opponents. The Democrats used the legal system to affect the outcome of the 2024 election.
Why are you like this? Who hurt you? Do we need to get out the doll so you can show us where someone touched you?
All I'm going to say here is that I appreciate the appropriate use of the word 'affect.' In a world where a lot of people would roll the dice on 'effect/affect,' you're the real MVP.
There's a difference between promising to go after the mob if you are elected and promising to put away John Gotti.
To be fair, I think in the way he phrased that sentence, both would have worked. Probably an old lawyer trick.
The snl skit will have him give a long heated answer and then as he turns back pull out a flask and take a swig
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
IUBB Postgame Q&A: Mike Woodson, Anthony Leal, Luke Goode- Latest: ZachBrowning
-
-
-
-
Is there any downside in replacing CMW immediately?- Latest: Tammany Hall